Labour Control and the Establishment of Profitable Settler Agriculture in Colonial Kenya, 1920-45
(2019) In Economic History of Developing Regions 34.- Abstract
- This article contributes to the growing literature on the impact of colonial legacies on long-run development. We focus on Kenya, where it is previously argued that land tenure and taxation policies created an impoverished class of wage workers leading to lower living standards, high inequality, and stunted economic development. We take issue with this interpretation. Using archival sources, we map the rise of profitable settler agriculture. Next, we correlate settler profitability with taxation and the development of African agriculture. Contrary to previous studies, we find that labour came from areas that became increasingly more commercialized. Thus, a decline in African livelihoods was not a necessary pre-condition for the... (More)
- This article contributes to the growing literature on the impact of colonial legacies on long-run development. We focus on Kenya, where it is previously argued that land tenure and taxation policies created an impoverished class of wage workers leading to lower living standards, high inequality, and stunted economic development. We take issue with this interpretation. Using archival sources, we map the rise of profitable settler agriculture. Next, we correlate settler profitability with taxation and the development of African agriculture. Contrary to previous studies, we find that labour came from areas that became increasingly more commercialized. Thus, a decline in African livelihoods was not a necessary pre-condition for the establishment of successful European settler agriculture. Instead a restructuring of the settler agricultural sector coinciding with tightened labour control policies can explain the increased profitability. An increased cultivation of high-value crops raised the value of labour. Reductions of African mobility lowered both the wage and transaction costs of finding and retraining workers enabling the settlers to raise their profit share. Our finding calls for a revision of the colonial legacy of European settler agriculture for long-term economic and social development in Kenya. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/2dc24951-626b-419a-977a-d1e81828d2d0
- author
- Fibaek, Maria LU and Green, Erik LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2019-04-10
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- settler agriculture, rural development, Kenya, colonial institutions
- in
- Economic History of Developing Regions
- volume
- 34
- publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85064167351
- ISSN
- 2078-0397
- DOI
- 10.1080/20780389.2019.1581058
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 2dc24951-626b-419a-977a-d1e81828d2d0
- date added to LUP
- 2019-04-15 17:02:56
- date last changed
- 2022-04-10 07:32:16
@article{2dc24951-626b-419a-977a-d1e81828d2d0,
abstract = {{This article contributes to the growing literature on the impact of colonial legacies on long-run development. We focus on Kenya, where it is previously argued that land tenure and taxation policies created an impoverished class of wage workers leading to lower living standards, high inequality, and stunted economic development. We take issue with this interpretation. Using archival sources, we map the rise of profitable settler agriculture. Next, we correlate settler profitability with taxation and the development of African agriculture. Contrary to previous studies, we find that labour came from areas that became increasingly more commercialized. Thus, a decline in African livelihoods was not a necessary pre-condition for the establishment of successful European settler agriculture. Instead a restructuring of the settler agricultural sector coinciding with tightened labour control policies can explain the increased profitability. An increased cultivation of high-value crops raised the value of labour. Reductions of African mobility lowered both the wage and transaction costs of finding and retraining workers enabling the settlers to raise their profit share. Our finding calls for a revision of the colonial legacy of European settler agriculture for long-term economic and social development in Kenya.}},
author = {{Fibaek, Maria and Green, Erik}},
issn = {{2078-0397}},
keywords = {{settler agriculture; rural development; Kenya; colonial institutions}},
language = {{eng}},
month = {{04}},
publisher = {{Taylor & Francis}},
series = {{Economic History of Developing Regions}},
title = {{Labour Control and the Establishment of Profitable Settler Agriculture in Colonial Kenya, 1920-45}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20780389.2019.1581058}},
doi = {{10.1080/20780389.2019.1581058}},
volume = {{34}},
year = {{2019}},
}