Workplace incivility and bystanders’ helping intentions
(2022) In International Journal of Conflict Management 33(2).- Abstract
Purpose: Using observational and experimental designs, the purpose of this study was to explore if the power relation between the offender and the victim of incivility and the level of perceived severity of the incivility were associated with bystanders’ intentions to help when witnessing workplace incivility. Design/methodology/approach: In Study 1, 160 participants completed a questionnaire where they described a recent uncivil incident they had witnessed, and completed measures of perceived severity and measures of their behavioural response as bystanders. In Study 2, 183 participants were randomised to read one of two vignettes (a manager being uncivil towards a subordinate or vice versa), and completed measures of perceived... (More)
Purpose: Using observational and experimental designs, the purpose of this study was to explore if the power relation between the offender and the victim of incivility and the level of perceived severity of the incivility were associated with bystanders’ intentions to help when witnessing workplace incivility. Design/methodology/approach: In Study 1, 160 participants completed a questionnaire where they described a recent uncivil incident they had witnessed, and completed measures of perceived severity and measures of their behavioural response as bystanders. In Study 2, 183 participants were randomised to read one of two vignettes (a manager being uncivil towards a subordinate or vice versa), and completed measures of perceived severity and of their motivation to intervene. The authors investigated whether the power relation between perpetrator and victim, and the perceived severity of the uncivil exchange, were associated with prosocial bystander behaviours in Study 1 and with motivation to defend the victim of incivility in Study 2. Findings: Higher perpetrator power was significantly associated with the incident being perceived as more severe, and higher perpetrator power was directly related to greater tendency to confront, and lower tendency to avoid, the perpetrator. Perpetrator power was indirectly associated with social support according to the perceived severity. A supervisor acting in an uncivil manner was rated as more severe than a subordinate acting in such a way. Perceived severity mediated the relationship between perpetrator power and the witness’s introjected, identified and intrinsic motivation to intervene. Originality/value: This study extends previous work by investigating how the perpetrator’s power influences both the bystander’s prosocial behaviour and their motivation to defend the victim. Furthermore, previous research has not considered how perceptions of severity might mediate the relationship between power, behaviour and motivation.
(Less)
- author
- Jungert, Tomas LU and Holm, Kristoffer LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2022
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Bystander behaviour, Motivation to intervene, Power, Prosocial behaviour, Severity, Workplace incivility
- in
- International Journal of Conflict Management
- volume
- 33
- issue
- 2
- publisher
- Emerald Group Publishing Limited
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85119018179
- ISSN
- 1044-4068
- DOI
- 10.1108/IJCMA-08-2021-0131
- project
- Workplace Incivility and Bystanders’ Helping Intentions
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- additional info
- Publisher Copyright: © 2021, Tomas Jungert and Kristoffer Holm.
- id
- 312aded8-881f-4c1a-9b15-527a00f7cdb7
- date added to LUP
- 2021-12-03 08:31:06
- date last changed
- 2023-11-23 13:49:54
@article{312aded8-881f-4c1a-9b15-527a00f7cdb7,
abstract = {{<p>Purpose: Using observational and experimental designs, the purpose of this study was to explore if the power relation between the offender and the victim of incivility and the level of perceived severity of the incivility were associated with bystanders’ intentions to help when witnessing workplace incivility. Design/methodology/approach: In Study 1, 160 participants completed a questionnaire where they described a recent uncivil incident they had witnessed, and completed measures of perceived severity and measures of their behavioural response as bystanders. In Study 2, 183 participants were randomised to read one of two vignettes (a manager being uncivil towards a subordinate or vice versa), and completed measures of perceived severity and of their motivation to intervene. The authors investigated whether the power relation between perpetrator and victim, and the perceived severity of the uncivil exchange, were associated with prosocial bystander behaviours in Study 1 and with motivation to defend the victim of incivility in Study 2. Findings: Higher perpetrator power was significantly associated with the incident being perceived as more severe, and higher perpetrator power was directly related to greater tendency to confront, and lower tendency to avoid, the perpetrator. Perpetrator power was indirectly associated with social support according to the perceived severity. A supervisor acting in an uncivil manner was rated as more severe than a subordinate acting in such a way. Perceived severity mediated the relationship between perpetrator power and the witness’s introjected, identified and intrinsic motivation to intervene. Originality/value: This study extends previous work by investigating how the perpetrator’s power influences both the bystander’s prosocial behaviour and their motivation to defend the victim. Furthermore, previous research has not considered how perceptions of severity might mediate the relationship between power, behaviour and motivation.</p>}},
author = {{Jungert, Tomas and Holm, Kristoffer}},
issn = {{1044-4068}},
keywords = {{Bystander behaviour; Motivation to intervene; Power; Prosocial behaviour; Severity; Workplace incivility}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{2}},
publisher = {{Emerald Group Publishing Limited}},
series = {{International Journal of Conflict Management}},
title = {{Workplace incivility and bystanders’ helping intentions}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-08-2021-0131}},
doi = {{10.1108/IJCMA-08-2021-0131}},
volume = {{33}},
year = {{2022}},
}