Total Hip Arthroplasty Leads to Better Results After Low-Energy Displaced Femoral Neck Fracture in Patients Aged 55 to 70 Years : A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial Comparing Internal Fixation and Total Hip Arthroplasty
(2022) In Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 104(15). p.1341-1351- Abstract
Background:The optimal treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in patients 55 to 70 years old remains controversial. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of closed reduction and internal fixation with cannulated screws (IF) compared with total hip arthroplasty (THA) on hip pain and function, with use of data for outcome measures, complications, and reoperations.Methods:This multicenter randomized controlled trial included all patients 55 to 70 years old who presented with a low-energy displaced femoral neck fracture between December 2013 and December 2018. Patients were randomly allocated to undergo either IF or THA. The primary outcome was the Harris Hip Score (HHS) at 12 months postoperatively. Secondary... (More)
Background:The optimal treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in patients 55 to 70 years old remains controversial. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of closed reduction and internal fixation with cannulated screws (IF) compared with total hip arthroplasty (THA) on hip pain and function, with use of data for outcome measures, complications, and reoperations.Methods:This multicenter randomized controlled trial included all patients 55 to 70 years old who presented with a low-energy displaced femoral neck fracture between December 2013 and December 2018. Patients were randomly allocated to undergo either IF or THA. The primary outcome was the Harris Hip Score (HHS) at 12 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were the HHS at 4 and 24 months postoperatively, Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-3L [EuroQol 5 Dimensions 3 Levels] index score and EQ-VAS [visual analogue scale]), VAS for pain, and VAS for patient satisfaction at 4, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Complications and reoperations were continuously monitored. The primary analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat principle.Results:A total of 102 patients with a mean (± standard deviation) age of 63.7 ± 4.2 years were allocated to IF (n = 51) or THA (n = 51). The mean difference in the primary outcome, the HHS at 12 months postoperatively (5.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.9 to 9.7; p = 0.017), was below the predefined minimal clinically important difference of 10 points. However, patients who underwent THA had a significantly higher HHS at 4 and 12 months, better OHS at 4 and 12 months, and better HOOS at 4, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Patients who underwent THA also reported better health-related quality of life at 4 months postoperatively and reported greater satisfaction and less pain at 4 and 12 months postoperatively. A total of 26 patients in the IF group (51%; 95% confidence interval, 37% to 65%) and 2 patients in the THA group (4%; 95% confidence interval, 0.5% to 13%) underwent a major reoperation.Conclusions:In this randomized controlled trial, we showed that patients between 55 and 70 years old who underwent THA for a low-energy displaced femoral neck fracture experienced better outcomes than those who underwent closed reduction and internal fixation.Level of Evidence:Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
(Less)
- author
- Bartels, Stefan ; Kristensen, Torbjørn B. ; Gjertsen, Jan Erik ; Frihagen, Frede ; Rogmark, Cecilia LU ; Dolatowski, Filip C. ; Figved, Wender ; Benth, Jūratė Šaltytė and Utvåg, Stein Erik
- organization
- publishing date
- 2022
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
- volume
- 104
- issue
- 15
- pages
- 11 pages
- publisher
- Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:35700073
- scopus:85135433196
- ISSN
- 0021-9355
- DOI
- 10.2106/JBJS.21.01411
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 31703e5f-e95d-48d4-bde7-91bc5688e8af
- date added to LUP
- 2022-10-07 12:49:29
- date last changed
- 2024-04-18 14:49:09
@article{31703e5f-e95d-48d4-bde7-91bc5688e8af,
abstract = {{<p>Background:The optimal treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in patients 55 to 70 years old remains controversial. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of closed reduction and internal fixation with cannulated screws (IF) compared with total hip arthroplasty (THA) on hip pain and function, with use of data for outcome measures, complications, and reoperations.Methods:This multicenter randomized controlled trial included all patients 55 to 70 years old who presented with a low-energy displaced femoral neck fracture between December 2013 and December 2018. Patients were randomly allocated to undergo either IF or THA. The primary outcome was the Harris Hip Score (HHS) at 12 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were the HHS at 4 and 24 months postoperatively, Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-3L [EuroQol 5 Dimensions 3 Levels] index score and EQ-VAS [visual analogue scale]), VAS for pain, and VAS for patient satisfaction at 4, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Complications and reoperations were continuously monitored. The primary analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat principle.Results:A total of 102 patients with a mean (± standard deviation) age of 63.7 ± 4.2 years were allocated to IF (n = 51) or THA (n = 51). The mean difference in the primary outcome, the HHS at 12 months postoperatively (5.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.9 to 9.7; p = 0.017), was below the predefined minimal clinically important difference of 10 points. However, patients who underwent THA had a significantly higher HHS at 4 and 12 months, better OHS at 4 and 12 months, and better HOOS at 4, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Patients who underwent THA also reported better health-related quality of life at 4 months postoperatively and reported greater satisfaction and less pain at 4 and 12 months postoperatively. A total of 26 patients in the IF group (51%; 95% confidence interval, 37% to 65%) and 2 patients in the THA group (4%; 95% confidence interval, 0.5% to 13%) underwent a major reoperation.Conclusions:In this randomized controlled trial, we showed that patients between 55 and 70 years old who underwent THA for a low-energy displaced femoral neck fracture experienced better outcomes than those who underwent closed reduction and internal fixation.Level of Evidence:Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>}},
author = {{Bartels, Stefan and Kristensen, Torbjørn B. and Gjertsen, Jan Erik and Frihagen, Frede and Rogmark, Cecilia and Dolatowski, Filip C. and Figved, Wender and Benth, Jūratė Šaltytė and Utvåg, Stein Erik}},
issn = {{0021-9355}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{15}},
pages = {{1341--1351}},
publisher = {{Lippincott Williams & Wilkins}},
series = {{Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery}},
title = {{Total Hip Arthroplasty Leads to Better Results After Low-Energy Displaced Femoral Neck Fracture in Patients Aged 55 to 70 Years : A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial Comparing Internal Fixation and Total Hip Arthroplasty}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.21.01411}},
doi = {{10.2106/JBJS.21.01411}},
volume = {{104}},
year = {{2022}},
}