An acceptability study of long-distance extractions in Swedish
(2017) p.103-120- Abstract
- The current study compares controlled acceptability judgments for Swedish relative clause extractions to extractions from that-clauses and extractions from non-restrictive relative clauses. It also compares each structure in both extracted and non-extracted form. The reported possibility of relative clause extraction in Swedish (and the other Mainland Scandinavian languages) has long presented a challenge to universal theories of constraints on extraction because the phenomenon is cross- linguistically very rare. In the off-line judgment data presented here, relative clause extractions are shown to pattern with extractions that are assumed to involve an island-like violation (non-restrictive relative clause extraction), thus... (More)
- The current study compares controlled acceptability judgments for Swedish relative clause extractions to extractions from that-clauses and extractions from non-restrictive relative clauses. It also compares each structure in both extracted and non-extracted form. The reported possibility of relative clause extraction in Swedish (and the other Mainland Scandinavian languages) has long presented a challenge to universal theories of constraints on extraction because the phenomenon is cross- linguistically very rare. In the off-line judgment data presented here, relative clause extractions are shown to pattern with extractions that are assumed to involve an island-like violation (non-restrictive relative clause extraction), thus contrasting with informal judgments reported in the literature. The data also appear to present a counterpoint to the conclusion reached in Tutunjian, Heinat, Klingvall and Wiklund (2017) from on-line eye-tracking measures, regarding the representational status of this structure as being more in line with that of a licit extraction. Potential explanations for the obtained patterns of the result are discussed, presenting avenues for further investigations. (Less)
    Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
    https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/31cfa430-586e-4088-8337-f676cf04ddd5
- author
- 						Wiklund, Anna-Lena
				LU
	; 						Heinat, Fredrik
				LU
				 ; 						Klingvall, Eva
				LU ; 						Klingvall, Eva
				LU and 						Tutunjian, Damon
				LU and 						Tutunjian, Damon
				LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2017
- type
- Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
- publication status
- published
- subject
- host publication
- Language Processing and Disorders
- editor
- Escobar, Linda ; Torrens, Vicenç and Parodi, Teresa
- pages
- 103 - 120
- publisher
- Cambridge Scholars Publishing
- ISBN
- 978-1-4438-9508-8
- project
- Universality and domain-specificity: processing relative clause extractions in Swedish
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 31cfa430-586e-4088-8337-f676cf04ddd5
- date added to LUP
- 2017-11-20 22:30:10
- date last changed
- 2025-04-04 15:16:17
@inbook{31cfa430-586e-4088-8337-f676cf04ddd5,
  abstract     = {{The current study compares controlled acceptability judgments for Swedish relative clause extractions to extractions from <i>that</i>-clauses and extractions from non-restrictive relative clauses. It also compares each structure in both extracted and non-extracted form. The reported possibility of relative clause extraction in Swedish (and the other Mainland Scandinavian languages) has long presented a challenge to universal theories of constraints on extraction because the phenomenon is cross- linguistically very rare. In the off-line judgment data presented here, relative clause extractions are shown to pattern with extractions that are assumed to involve an island-like violation (non-restrictive relative clause extraction), thus contrasting with informal judgments reported in the literature. The data also appear to present a counterpoint to the conclusion reached in Tutunjian, Heinat, Klingvall and Wiklund (2017) from on-line eye-tracking measures, regarding the representational status of this structure as being more in line with that of a licit extraction. Potential explanations for the obtained patterns of the result are discussed, presenting avenues for further investigations.}},
  author       = {{Wiklund, Anna-Lena and Heinat, Fredrik and Klingvall, Eva and Tutunjian, Damon}},
  booktitle    = {{Language Processing and Disorders}},
  editor       = {{Escobar, Linda and Torrens, Vicenç and Parodi, Teresa}},
  isbn         = {{978-1-4438-9508-8}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{103--120}},
  publisher    = {{Cambridge Scholars Publishing}},
  title        = {{An acceptability study of long-distance extractions in Swedish}},
  year         = {{2017}},
}