Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Multi-model simulation performance of monthly water balance models for global catchments : Thresholds and structural sensitivity

Ning, Zhongrui LU orcid ; Zhang, Jianyun ; Wu, Nan LU ; Hashemi, Hossein LU orcid ; Jaramillo, Fernando ; Naghibi, Amir LU ; Xie, Kang ; Ruan, Yuli ; Liu, Cuishan and Wang, Guoqing , et al. (2026) In Journal of Hydrology 667.
Abstract

Water balance models provide insights into ongoing changes in the water cycle. Among them, monthly water balance models (MWBMs) are especially suitable for large-sample and global assessments, which are important for adaptation to global environmental change. This study evaluates monthly water balances from 14 models across more than 2,000 global catchments, comparing the modelś capacities to reproduce water-cycle processes and produce results. We showed that most of the considered models produce reasonable runoff simulations across most settings. However, notably not in catchments at latitudes above 60°N or when the ratio of snowfall to total precipitation exceeds 20 %. By contrast, the inclusion of a non-linear snow module enabled the... (More)

Water balance models provide insights into ongoing changes in the water cycle. Among them, monthly water balance models (MWBMs) are especially suitable for large-sample and global assessments, which are important for adaptation to global environmental change. This study evaluates monthly water balances from 14 models across more than 2,000 global catchments, comparing the modelś capacities to reproduce water-cycle processes and produce results. We showed that most of the considered models produce reasonable runoff simulations across most settings. However, notably not in catchments at latitudes above 60°N or when the ratio of snowfall to total precipitation exceeds 20 %. By contrast, the inclusion of a non-linear snow module enabled the extended models to achieve similarly good performance in snow-affected basins as in non-snow basins. The improved fit was not mainly due to an increased number of fitting parameters, but rather to a better representation of physical processes, including freeze–thaw cycles. Furthermore, models generally performed slightly better in relatively humid regions than in arid ones. For instance, performances were not sensitive to model structure when catchments were humid enough, with approximate thresholds of annual precipitation exceeding 1000 mm and annual runoff exceeding 300 mm. Also, simulation results for larger catchments were frequently more stable than those for smaller catchments. We expect these insights could aid in assessing, identifying, and addressing potential biases in regional water balance modeling studies worldwide, which may be important for finding effective solutions to mitigate the effects of ongoing hydroclimatic change.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; and , et al. (More)
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; and (Less)
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Journal of Hydrology
volume
667
article number
134852
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • scopus:105030091611
ISSN
0022-1694
DOI
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.134852
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
3318bbda-098f-4ab6-9d74-4c71c5805f2d
date added to LUP
2026-04-16 13:15:30
date last changed
2026-04-16 13:16:24
@article{3318bbda-098f-4ab6-9d74-4c71c5805f2d,
  abstract     = {{<p>Water balance models provide insights into ongoing changes in the water cycle. Among them, monthly water balance models (MWBMs) are especially suitable for large-sample and global assessments, which are important for adaptation to global environmental change. This study evaluates monthly water balances from 14 models across more than 2,000 global catchments, comparing the modelś capacities to reproduce water-cycle processes and produce results. We showed that most of the considered models produce reasonable runoff simulations across most settings. However, notably not in catchments at latitudes above 60°N or when the ratio of snowfall to total precipitation exceeds 20 %. By contrast, the inclusion of a non-linear snow module enabled the extended models to achieve similarly good performance in snow-affected basins as in non-snow basins. The improved fit was not mainly due to an increased number of fitting parameters, but rather to a better representation of physical processes, including freeze–thaw cycles. Furthermore, models generally performed slightly better in relatively humid regions than in arid ones. For instance, performances were not sensitive to model structure when catchments were humid enough, with approximate thresholds of annual precipitation exceeding 1000 mm and annual runoff exceeding 300 mm. Also, simulation results for larger catchments were frequently more stable than those for smaller catchments. We expect these insights could aid in assessing, identifying, and addressing potential biases in regional water balance modeling studies worldwide, which may be important for finding effective solutions to mitigate the effects of ongoing hydroclimatic change.</p>}},
  author       = {{Ning, Zhongrui and Zhang, Jianyun and Wu, Nan and Hashemi, Hossein and Jaramillo, Fernando and Naghibi, Amir and Xie, Kang and Ruan, Yuli and Liu, Cuishan and Wang, Guoqing and Jarsjö, Jerker}},
  issn         = {{0022-1694}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  series       = {{Journal of Hydrology}},
  title        = {{Multi-model simulation performance of monthly water balance models for global catchments : Thresholds and structural sensitivity}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.134852}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.134852}},
  volume       = {{667}},
  year         = {{2026}},
}