The Inelastic Demand for Affirmative Action
(2021) In Working Papers- Abstract
- We study the origins of support for gender-related affirmative action (AA) in two pre-registered online experiments (N = 1, 700). Participants act as employers who decide whether to use AA in hiring job candidates. We implement three treatments to disentangle the preference for AA stemming from i) perceived gender differences in productivity, ii) beliefs about AA effects on productivity, or iii) other non-material motives. To test i), we provide information to employers that there is no gender gap in productivity. To test ii), we inform the candidates about the hiring rule ex-ante, allowing us to observe how AA is expected to affect productivity. To test iii), we remove the payment to the employers based on the chosen candidates’ productiv-... (More)
- We study the origins of support for gender-related affirmative action (AA) in two pre-registered online experiments (N = 1, 700). Participants act as employers who decide whether to use AA in hiring job candidates. We implement three treatments to disentangle the preference for AA stemming from i) perceived gender differences in productivity, ii) beliefs about AA effects on productivity, or iii) other non-material motives. To test i), we provide information to employers that there is no gender gap in productivity. To test ii), we inform the candidates about the hiring rule ex-ante, allowing us to observe how AA is expected to affect productivity. To test iii), we remove the payment to the employers based on the chosen candidates’ productiv- ity, thus making AA cheaper. We do not find significant differences in AA support across treatments, despite successfully altering beliefs about expected productivity differences. Our results suggest that AA choice reflects a more intrinsic and inelastic preference for advancing female candidates. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/34598953-ee94-43d2-9f02-43488844f46b
- author
- Getik, Demid LU ; Islam, Marco LU and Samahita, Margaret
- organization
- publishing date
- 2021
- type
- Working paper/Preprint
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- affirmative action, beliefs, gender, information, institution, C91, D02, D83, J38, J71
- in
- Working Papers
- issue
- 2021:7
- pages
- 48 pages
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 34598953-ee94-43d2-9f02-43488844f46b
- date added to LUP
- 2021-05-19 16:30:59
- date last changed
- 2024-03-11 14:43:32
@misc{34598953-ee94-43d2-9f02-43488844f46b,
abstract = {{We study the origins of support for gender-related affirmative action (AA) in two pre-registered online experiments (N = 1, 700). Participants act as employers who decide whether to use AA in hiring job candidates. We implement three treatments to disentangle the preference for AA stemming from i) perceived gender differences in productivity, ii) beliefs about AA effects on productivity, or iii) other non-material motives. To test i), we provide information to employers that there is no gender gap in productivity. To test ii), we inform the candidates about the hiring rule ex-ante, allowing us to observe how AA is expected to affect productivity. To test iii), we remove the payment to the employers based on the chosen candidates’ productiv- ity, thus making AA cheaper. We do not find significant differences in AA support across treatments, despite successfully altering beliefs about expected productivity differences. Our results suggest that AA choice reflects a more intrinsic and inelastic preference for advancing female candidates.}},
author = {{Getik, Demid and Islam, Marco and Samahita, Margaret}},
keywords = {{affirmative action; beliefs; gender; information; institution; C91; D02; D83; J38; J71}},
language = {{eng}},
note = {{Working Paper}},
number = {{2021:7}},
series = {{Working Papers}},
title = {{The Inelastic Demand for Affirmative Action}},
url = {{https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/173632512/WP21_7.pdf}},
year = {{2021}},
}