Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Histological variants of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma : a survival analysis

Bengtsson, Axel LU ; Andersson, Roland LU and Ansari, Daniel LU (2024) In Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 409(1).
Abstract

Purpose: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) can be classified into distinct histological subtypes based on the WHO nomenclature. The aim of this study was to compare the prognosis of conventional PDAC (cPDAC) against the other histological variants at the population level. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify patients with microscopically confirmed PDAC. These patients were divided into 9 histological subgroups. Overall survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression models stratified by tumor histology. Results: A total of 159,548 patients with PDAC were identified, of whom 95.9% had cPDAC, followed by colloid carcinoma (CC) (2.6%), adenosquamous... (More)

Purpose: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) can be classified into distinct histological subtypes based on the WHO nomenclature. The aim of this study was to compare the prognosis of conventional PDAC (cPDAC) against the other histological variants at the population level. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify patients with microscopically confirmed PDAC. These patients were divided into 9 histological subgroups. Overall survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression models stratified by tumor histology. Results: A total of 159,548 patients with PDAC were identified, of whom 95.9% had cPDAC, followed by colloid carcinoma (CC) (2.6%), adenosquamous carcinoma (ASqC) (0.8%), signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) (0.5%), undifferentiated carcinoma (UC) (0.1%), undifferentiated carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells (UCOGC) (0.1%), hepatoid carcinoma (HC) (0.01%), medullary carcinoma of the pancreas (MCP) (0.006%) and pancreatic undifferentiated carcinoma with rhabdoid phenotype (PUCR) (0.003%). Kaplan-Meier curves showed that PUCR had the worst prognosis (median survival: 2 months; 5-year survival: 0%), while MCP had the best prognosis (median survival: 41 months; 5-year survival: 33.3%). In a multivariable Cox model, several histological subtypes (i.e. CC, ASqC, SRCC, UCOGC) were identified as independent predictors of overall survival when compared to cPDAC. Conclusion: PDAC is a heterogenous disease and accurate identification of variant histology is important for risk stratification, as these variants may have different biological behavior.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Histological subtypes, Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, SEER, Survival
in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
volume
409
issue
1
article number
312
publisher
Springer
external identifiers
  • pmid:39425752
  • scopus:85206872473
ISSN
1435-2443
DOI
10.1007/s00423-024-03506-6
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
3497f9d5-5de4-4241-b637-87544ded342c
date added to LUP
2024-12-03 14:47:25
date last changed
2025-07-16 22:05:16
@article{3497f9d5-5de4-4241-b637-87544ded342c,
  abstract     = {{<p>Purpose: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) can be classified into distinct histological subtypes based on the WHO nomenclature. The aim of this study was to compare the prognosis of conventional PDAC (cPDAC) against the other histological variants at the population level. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify patients with microscopically confirmed PDAC. These patients were divided into 9 histological subgroups. Overall survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression models stratified by tumor histology. Results: A total of 159,548 patients with PDAC were identified, of whom 95.9% had cPDAC, followed by colloid carcinoma (CC) (2.6%), adenosquamous carcinoma (ASqC) (0.8%), signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) (0.5%), undifferentiated carcinoma (UC) (0.1%), undifferentiated carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells (UCOGC) (0.1%), hepatoid carcinoma (HC) (0.01%), medullary carcinoma of the pancreas (MCP) (0.006%) and pancreatic undifferentiated carcinoma with rhabdoid phenotype (PUCR) (0.003%). Kaplan-Meier curves showed that PUCR had the worst prognosis (median survival: 2 months; 5-year survival: 0%), while MCP had the best prognosis (median survival: 41 months; 5-year survival: 33.3%). In a multivariable Cox model, several histological subtypes (i.e. CC, ASqC, SRCC, UCOGC) were identified as independent predictors of overall survival when compared to cPDAC. Conclusion: PDAC is a heterogenous disease and accurate identification of variant histology is important for risk stratification, as these variants may have different biological behavior.</p>}},
  author       = {{Bengtsson, Axel and Andersson, Roland and Ansari, Daniel}},
  issn         = {{1435-2443}},
  keywords     = {{Histological subtypes; Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; SEER; Survival}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{1}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  series       = {{Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery}},
  title        = {{Histological variants of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma : a survival analysis}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-024-03506-6}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s00423-024-03506-6}},
  volume       = {{409}},
  year         = {{2024}},
}