“Our Best Enemy”: Right to Repair and the Politics of Agonistic Circularity
(2025) In Organization & Environment 38(4).- Abstract
- Circular economy (CE) is both contesting the status quo and a contested idea, for which many competing understandings and implementations exist. And yet, analyses of the role of social conflicts and pluralism are rare in the CE literature, overly focused on convergence and cooperation. To address this research gap, we draw on Mouffe’s “agonistic pluralism” political theory. Empirically, the study focuses on the interplay between different groups of actors in shaping the right to repair (R2R) policy debate in the European Union (EU) context. Deploying a process method consisting of secondary data and semistructured interviews, our analysis shows that productive conflicts between the R2R campaign and manufacturers did foster mutual learning,... (More)
- Circular economy (CE) is both contesting the status quo and a contested idea, for which many competing understandings and implementations exist. And yet, analyses of the role of social conflicts and pluralism are rare in the CE literature, overly focused on convergence and cooperation. To address this research gap, we draw on Mouffe’s “agonistic pluralism” political theory. Empirically, the study focuses on the interplay between different groups of actors in shaping the right to repair (R2R) policy debate in the European Union (EU) context. Deploying a process method consisting of secondary data and semistructured interviews, our analysis shows that productive conflicts between the R2R campaign and manufacturers did foster mutual learning, unlikely convergences, and a more pluralist European repair ecosystem. We call this dynamic “agonistic circularity.” We highlight the limits of both “harmonious” and “antagonistic” circularity, outlining a pluralist integrative model of CE politics. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/3830fe36-c37f-4d5c-a049-88bd072753ba
- author
- Monciardini, David
; Fernandez-Montenegro von Schack, Philipp Salvador
LU
; Batista-Pritchard, Lívia R.
and Richter, Jessika Luth
LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2025
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Organization & Environment
- volume
- 38
- issue
- 4
- publisher
- SAGE Publications
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:105020043195
- ISSN
- 1086-0266
- DOI
- 10.1177/10860266251364566
- project
- Mapping out and overcoming barriers for circular products: the policy context for corporations that want to “go circular”
- JustCE (LEX) – Toward a Just Circular Economy
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 3830fe36-c37f-4d5c-a049-88bd072753ba
- date added to LUP
- 2025-12-10 13:38:01
- date last changed
- 2025-12-12 08:13:46
@article{3830fe36-c37f-4d5c-a049-88bd072753ba,
abstract = {{Circular economy (CE) is both contesting the status quo and a contested idea, for which many competing understandings and implementations exist. And yet, analyses of the role of social conflicts and pluralism are rare in the CE literature, overly focused on convergence and cooperation. To address this research gap, we draw on Mouffe’s “agonistic pluralism” political theory. Empirically, the study focuses on the interplay between different groups of actors in shaping the right to repair (R2R) policy debate in the European Union (EU) context. Deploying a process method consisting of secondary data and semistructured interviews, our analysis shows that productive conflicts between the R2R campaign and manufacturers did foster mutual learning, unlikely convergences, and a more pluralist European repair ecosystem. We call this dynamic “agonistic circularity.” We highlight the limits of both “harmonious” and “antagonistic” circularity, outlining a pluralist integrative model of CE politics.}},
author = {{Monciardini, David and Fernandez-Montenegro von Schack, Philipp Salvador and Batista-Pritchard, Lívia R. and Richter, Jessika Luth}},
issn = {{1086-0266}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{4}},
publisher = {{SAGE Publications}},
series = {{Organization & Environment}},
title = {{“Our Best Enemy”: Right to Repair and the Politics of Agonistic Circularity}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10860266251364566}},
doi = {{10.1177/10860266251364566}},
volume = {{38}},
year = {{2025}},
}