Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

How false feedback influences decision-makers' risk preferences

Kusev, Petko ; van Schaik, Paul ; Teal, Joseph ; Martin, Rose ; Hall, Lars LU and Johansson, Petter LU (2022) In Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 35(5).
Abstract

Recent decision-making research provides empirical evidence that human risk preferences are constructed “on the fly” during risk elicitation, influenced by the decision-making context and the method of risk elicitation (Kusev et al., 2020). In this article, we explore the lability of human risk preferences and argue that the most recent choices guide decision-making. Accordingly, our novel proposal and experimental method provide a psychological tool that measures people's shift in preferences. Specifically, in our experiment (240 participants, registered UK users of an online survey panel), we developed and employed a two-stage risk elicitation experimental method. The results from the experiment revealed that providing participants... (More)

Recent decision-making research provides empirical evidence that human risk preferences are constructed “on the fly” during risk elicitation, influenced by the decision-making context and the method of risk elicitation (Kusev et al., 2020). In this article, we explore the lability of human risk preferences and argue that the most recent choices guide decision-making. Accordingly, our novel proposal and experimental method provide a psychological tool that measures people's shift in preferences. Specifically, in our experiment (240 participants, registered UK users of an online survey panel), we developed and employed a two-stage risk elicitation experimental method. The results from the experiment revealed that providing participants with false feedback on their initial decisions (stage 1) changes their risk preferences at the feedback stage of the experiment in the direction of the false feedback. Moreover, participants' final decisions (stage 2) were influenced by the type of feedback (correct or false) and informed by their altered risk preferences at the feedback stage of the experiment. In conclusion, our work provides experimental evidence that human preferences are constructed “on the fly,” influenced by the decision-making context and recent decision-making experience (e.g., Kusev et al., 2020; Slovic, 1995).

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
decision experience, decision-making under risk, false feedback, preference reversals, prospect theory
in
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
volume
35
issue
5
article number
e2278
publisher
John Wiley & Sons Inc.
external identifiers
  • scopus:85124722185
ISSN
0894-3257
DOI
10.1002/bdm.2278
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
3d11532f-f4ca-48a5-b33b-b46b0daf7255
date added to LUP
2022-04-14 11:39:11
date last changed
2023-01-04 14:35:56
@article{3d11532f-f4ca-48a5-b33b-b46b0daf7255,
  abstract     = {{<p>Recent decision-making research provides empirical evidence that human risk preferences are constructed “on the fly” during risk elicitation, influenced by the decision-making context and the method of risk elicitation (Kusev et al., 2020). In this article, we explore the lability of human risk preferences and argue that the most recent choices guide decision-making. Accordingly, our novel proposal and experimental method provide a psychological tool that measures people's shift in preferences. Specifically, in our experiment (240 participants, registered UK users of an online survey panel), we developed and employed a two-stage risk elicitation experimental method. The results from the experiment revealed that providing participants with false feedback on their initial decisions (stage 1) changes their risk preferences at the feedback stage of the experiment in the direction of the false feedback. Moreover, participants' final decisions (stage 2) were influenced by the type of feedback (correct or false) and informed by their altered risk preferences at the feedback stage of the experiment. In conclusion, our work provides experimental evidence that human preferences are constructed “on the fly,” influenced by the decision-making context and recent decision-making experience (e.g., Kusev et al., 2020; Slovic, 1995).</p>}},
  author       = {{Kusev, Petko and van Schaik, Paul and Teal, Joseph and Martin, Rose and Hall, Lars and Johansson, Petter}},
  issn         = {{0894-3257}},
  keywords     = {{decision experience; decision-making under risk; false feedback; preference reversals; prospect theory}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{5}},
  publisher    = {{John Wiley & Sons Inc.}},
  series       = {{Journal of Behavioral Decision Making}},
  title        = {{How false feedback influences decision-makers' risk preferences}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2278}},
  doi          = {{10.1002/bdm.2278}},
  volume       = {{35}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}