Molecular diagnostics of salmonella and campylobacter in human/animal fecal samples remain feasible after long-term sample storage without specific requirements
(2021) In AIMS Microbiology 7(4). p.399-414- Abstract
Rapid advances in the development of sequencing technologies, numbers of commercial providers and diminishing costs have made DNA-based identification and diagnostics increasingly accessible to doctors and laboratories, eliminating the need for local investments in expensive technology and training or hiring of skilled technicians. However, reliable and comparable molecular analyses of bacteria in stool samples are dependent on storage and workflow conditions that do not introduce post-sampling bias, the most important factor being the need to keep the DNA at a stable detectable level. For that reason, there may remain other prohibitively costly requirements for cooling or freezing equipment or special chemical additives. This study... (More)
Rapid advances in the development of sequencing technologies, numbers of commercial providers and diminishing costs have made DNA-based identification and diagnostics increasingly accessible to doctors and laboratories, eliminating the need for local investments in expensive technology and training or hiring of skilled technicians. However, reliable and comparable molecular analyses of bacteria in stool samples are dependent on storage and workflow conditions that do not introduce post-sampling bias, the most important factor being the need to keep the DNA at a stable detectable level. For that reason, there may remain other prohibitively costly requirements for cooling or freezing equipment or special chemical additives. This study investigates the diagnostic detectability of Salmonella and Campylobacter DNA in human, pig and chicken stool samples, stored at different temperatures and with different preservation methods. Stool samples were spiked with 106 CFU/mL of both Salmonella and Campylobacter strains stored at −20 ℃, 5 ℃ and 20 ℃ (Room temperature, RT) and treated with either RNAlater, EDTA or Silica/ethanol. DNA was extracted at 9 different time points within 30 days and quantified by Qubit (total DNA) and qPCR (Salmonella and Campylobacter DNA). We found no statistically significant differences among the different preservation methods, and DNA from both species was easily detected at all time points and at all temperatures, both with and without preservation. This suggests that infections by these bacteria can be diagnosed and possibly also analysed in further detail simply by taking a stool sample in any suitable sealed container that can be transported to laboratory analysis without special storage or preservation requirements. We briefly discuss how this finding can benefit infection control in both developed and developing countries.
(Less)
- author
- Harder, C. B. LU ; Persson, S. ; Christensen, J. ; Ljubic, A. ; Nielsen, E. M. and Hoorfar, J.
- organization
- publishing date
- 2021
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Campylobacter, Detection threshold, Diagnostics, DNA stability, Gastritis, Pathogens, Preservation methods, Salmonella
- in
- AIMS Microbiology
- volume
- 7
- issue
- 4
- pages
- 16 pages
- publisher
- AIMS Press
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85120166201
- ISSN
- 2471-1888
- DOI
- 10.3934/MICROBIOL.2021024
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 3e7bf044-fd28-4c96-9cae-79d1eb607623
- date added to LUP
- 2021-12-14 12:06:28
- date last changed
- 2022-04-27 06:38:44
@article{3e7bf044-fd28-4c96-9cae-79d1eb607623,
abstract = {{<p>Rapid advances in the development of sequencing technologies, numbers of commercial providers and diminishing costs have made DNA-based identification and diagnostics increasingly accessible to doctors and laboratories, eliminating the need for local investments in expensive technology and training or hiring of skilled technicians. However, reliable and comparable molecular analyses of bacteria in stool samples are dependent on storage and workflow conditions that do not introduce post-sampling bias, the most important factor being the need to keep the DNA at a stable detectable level. For that reason, there may remain other prohibitively costly requirements for cooling or freezing equipment or special chemical additives. This study investigates the diagnostic detectability of Salmonella and Campylobacter DNA in human, pig and chicken stool samples, stored at different temperatures and with different preservation methods. Stool samples were spiked with 10<sup>6</sup> CFU/mL of both Salmonella and Campylobacter strains stored at −20 ℃, 5 ℃ and 20 ℃ (Room temperature, RT) and treated with either RNAlater, EDTA or Silica/ethanol. DNA was extracted at 9 different time points within 30 days and quantified by Qubit (total DNA) and qPCR (Salmonella and Campylobacter DNA). We found no statistically significant differences among the different preservation methods, and DNA from both species was easily detected at all time points and at all temperatures, both with and without preservation. This suggests that infections by these bacteria can be diagnosed and possibly also analysed in further detail simply by taking a stool sample in any suitable sealed container that can be transported to laboratory analysis without special storage or preservation requirements. We briefly discuss how this finding can benefit infection control in both developed and developing countries.</p>}},
author = {{Harder, C. B. and Persson, S. and Christensen, J. and Ljubic, A. and Nielsen, E. M. and Hoorfar, J.}},
issn = {{2471-1888}},
keywords = {{Campylobacter; Detection threshold; Diagnostics; DNA stability; Gastritis; Pathogens; Preservation methods; Salmonella}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{4}},
pages = {{399--414}},
publisher = {{AIMS Press}},
series = {{AIMS Microbiology}},
title = {{Molecular diagnostics of salmonella and campylobacter in human/animal fecal samples remain feasible after long-term sample storage without specific requirements}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/MICROBIOL.2021024}},
doi = {{10.3934/MICROBIOL.2021024}},
volume = {{7}},
year = {{2021}},
}