Combination of a leadless pacemaker and subcutaneous defibrillator with nine effective shock treatments during follow-up of 18 months
(2019) In Journal of Electrocardiology 56. p.1-3- Abstract
We present a case of combination of a leadless pacemaker (Micra) and a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD). The patient had a total of nine adequate shock treatments of ventricular fibrillation during 18 months of follow-up after the implantation. The shock treatments did not lead to any alteration in the Micra. All three sensing vectors of the S-ICD worked well. After 18 months, the functioning of both Micra and S-ICD continues to be uneventful. This case demonstrates that S-ICD combined with Micra may be a safe and feasible approach to provide pacing and ICD treatment without intracardiac leads.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/3f256e04-745a-4e48-a9bd-7250038ad073
- author
- Ljungström, Erik
; Brandt, Johan
LU
; Mörtsell, David
LU
; Borgquist, Rasmus LU
and Wang, Lingwei LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2019
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Effective shock treatment, Leadless pacemaker, Subcutaneous defibrillator (S-ICD), Ventricular fibrillation (VF)
- in
- Journal of Electrocardiology
- volume
- 56
- pages
- 3 pages
- publisher
- Elsevier
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:31226509
- scopus:85067310769
- ISSN
- 0022-0736
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2019.06.001
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 3f256e04-745a-4e48-a9bd-7250038ad073
- date added to LUP
- 2019-06-26 11:07:41
- date last changed
- 2025-01-23 20:43:24
@article{3f256e04-745a-4e48-a9bd-7250038ad073, abstract = {{<p>We present a case of combination of a leadless pacemaker (Micra) and a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD). The patient had a total of nine adequate shock treatments of ventricular fibrillation during 18 months of follow-up after the implantation. The shock treatments did not lead to any alteration in the Micra. All three sensing vectors of the S-ICD worked well. After 18 months, the functioning of both Micra and S-ICD continues to be uneventful. This case demonstrates that S-ICD combined with Micra may be a safe and feasible approach to provide pacing and ICD treatment without intracardiac leads.</p>}}, author = {{Ljungström, Erik and Brandt, Johan and Mörtsell, David and Borgquist, Rasmus and Wang, Lingwei}}, issn = {{0022-0736}}, keywords = {{Effective shock treatment; Leadless pacemaker; Subcutaneous defibrillator (S-ICD); Ventricular fibrillation (VF)}}, language = {{eng}}, pages = {{1--3}}, publisher = {{Elsevier}}, series = {{Journal of Electrocardiology}}, title = {{Combination of a leadless pacemaker and subcutaneous defibrillator with nine effective shock treatments during follow-up of 18 months}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2019.06.001}}, doi = {{10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2019.06.001}}, volume = {{56}}, year = {{2019}}, }