More Power to the People: : Electricity Adoption, Technological Change and Social Conflict
(2019) In CEPR Discussion paper p.1-36- Abstract
- There is a wide-spread concern that technical change may spur social conflicts, especially if workers are replaced with machines. To empirically analyze whether job destruction drives protests, we study a historical example of a revolutionary new technology: the adoption of electricity. Focusing on the gradual roll-out of the Swedish electricity grid between 1900 and 1920 enables us to analyze 2,487 Swedish parishes in a difference-in-differences framework. Proximity to large-scale water-powered electricity plants is used to instrument for electricity adoption. Our results confirm that the labor saving nature of electricity was followed by an increase of local conflicts in the form of strikes. But displaced workers were not likely to... (More)
- There is a wide-spread concern that technical change may spur social conflicts, especially if workers are replaced with machines. To empirically analyze whether job destruction drives protests, we study a historical example of a revolutionary new technology: the adoption of electricity. Focusing on the gradual roll-out of the Swedish electricity grid between 1900 and 1920 enables us to analyze 2,487 Swedish parishes in a difference-in-differences framework. Proximity to large-scale water-powered electricity plants is used to instrument for electricity adoption. Our results confirm that the labor saving nature of electricity was followed by an increase of local conflicts in the form of strikes. But displaced workers were not likely to initiate conflicts. Instead, strikes were most common in sectors with employment growth. Similarly, we find that the strikes were of an offensive rather than a defensive nature. Thus, electrification did not result in rebellions driven by technological anxiety. It rather provided workers with a stronger bargaining position from which they could voice their claims through strikes. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/400a2a4f-e3ed-45c7-bdb6-db962da0a4c1
- author
- Enflo, Kerstin
LU
; Karlsson, Tobias LU and Molinder, Jakob LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2019-09-09
- type
- Working paper/Preprint
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- electrification, infrastructure investments, Labor conflicts, labor demand, strikes, Technological change
- in
- CEPR Discussion paper
- issue
- 13986
- pages
- 36 pages
- publisher
- Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR)
- project
- From Sundsvall to Saltsjöbaden: A regional perspective on strikes at the Swedish labor market
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 400a2a4f-e3ed-45c7-bdb6-db962da0a4c1
- alternative location
- http://cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=13986
- date added to LUP
- 2019-09-09 11:16:44
- date last changed
- 2021-10-01 02:19:57
@misc{400a2a4f-e3ed-45c7-bdb6-db962da0a4c1, abstract = {{There is a wide-spread concern that technical change may spur social conflicts, especially if workers are replaced with machines. To empirically analyze whether job destruction drives protests, we study a historical example of a revolutionary new technology: the adoption of electricity. Focusing on the gradual roll-out of the Swedish electricity grid between 1900 and 1920 enables us to analyze 2,487 Swedish parishes in a difference-in-differences framework. Proximity to large-scale water-powered electricity plants is used to instrument for electricity adoption. Our results confirm that the labor saving nature of electricity was followed by an increase of local conflicts in the form of strikes. But displaced workers were not likely to initiate conflicts. Instead, strikes were most common in sectors with employment growth. Similarly, we find that the strikes were of an offensive rather than a defensive nature. Thus, electrification did not result in rebellions driven by technological anxiety. It rather provided workers with a stronger bargaining position from which they could voice their claims through strikes.}}, author = {{Enflo, Kerstin and Karlsson, Tobias and Molinder, Jakob}}, keywords = {{electrification; infrastructure investments; Labor conflicts; labor demand; strikes; Technological change}}, language = {{eng}}, month = {{09}}, note = {{Working Paper}}, number = {{13986}}, pages = {{1--36}}, publisher = {{Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR)}}, series = {{CEPR Discussion paper}}, title = {{More Power to the People: : Electricity Adoption, Technological Change and Social Conflict}}, url = {{http://cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=13986}}, year = {{2019}}, }