Transnational contestation for local communities within the formation of the European Union’s Critical Raw Materials Act – a critical appraisal
(2025) In Environmental Politics p.1-23- Abstract
- This article presents a critical appraisal of the European Union’s (EU) policy process that delivered the Critical Raw Materials Act, 2023–2024. We combine Marxist-Gramscian perspectives on regional blocs and social movement theory on transnational contestation to study a framing contest at two points in the policy process. First, we examined environmental justice frames in technical campaigns to identify how social and environmental concerns of local communities were used as objects of contestation within the public consultation round. Second, we analyzed the followng proposal from the European Commission and found that its dominant policy frames were constructed around mining-for-sustainability, mining-for-security and... (More)
- This article presents a critical appraisal of the European Union’s (EU) policy process that delivered the Critical Raw Materials Act, 2023–2024. We combine Marxist-Gramscian perspectives on regional blocs and social movement theory on transnational contestation to study a framing contest at two points in the policy process. First, we examined environmental justice frames in technical campaigns to identify how social and environmental concerns of local communities were used as objects of contestation within the public consultation round. Second, we analyzed the followng proposal from the European Commission and found that its dominant policy frames were constructed around mining-for-sustainability, mining-for-security and public-acceptance-for-mining – incorporating only concerns that were less threatening to mining. We argue that technical campaigns on mining within EU policy processes will deliver outcomes in line with dominant territorial and capitalist interests – unless there are powerful domestic political campaigns that draw on political economic perspectives on environmental politics. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/43654a3f-d995-4c3b-b2c0-78d7f99ab507
- author
- Götz, Valeska and Harnesk, David LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2025-05-09
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- epub
- subject
- in
- Environmental Politics
- pages
- 1 - 23
- publisher
- Routledge
- ISSN
- 0964-4016
- DOI
- 10.1080/09644016.2025.2501397
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 43654a3f-d995-4c3b-b2c0-78d7f99ab507
- date added to LUP
- 2025-05-12 13:57:56
- date last changed
- 2025-05-13 08:45:28
@article{43654a3f-d995-4c3b-b2c0-78d7f99ab507, abstract = {{This article presents a critical appraisal of the European Union’s (EU) policy process that delivered the Critical Raw Materials Act, 2023–2024. We combine Marxist-Gramscian perspectives on regional blocs and social movement theory on transnational contestation to study a framing contest at two points in the policy process. First, we examined environmental justice frames in technical campaigns to identify how social and environmental concerns of local communities were used as objects of contestation within the public consultation round. Second, we analyzed the followng proposal from the European Commission and found that its dominant policy frames were constructed around mining-for-sustainability, mining-for-security and public-acceptance-for-mining – incorporating only concerns that were less threatening to mining. We argue that technical campaigns on mining within EU policy processes will deliver outcomes in line with dominant territorial and capitalist interests – unless there are powerful domestic political campaigns that draw on political economic perspectives on environmental politics.}}, author = {{Götz, Valeska and Harnesk, David}}, issn = {{0964-4016}}, language = {{eng}}, month = {{05}}, pages = {{1--23}}, publisher = {{Routledge}}, series = {{Environmental Politics}}, title = {{Transnational contestation for local communities within the formation of the European Union’s Critical Raw Materials Act – a critical appraisal}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2025.2501397}}, doi = {{10.1080/09644016.2025.2501397}}, year = {{2025}}, }