Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

A Review of Progress and Applications in Wood Quality Modelling

Drew, David M. ; Downes, Geoffrey M. ; Seifert, Thomas ; Eckes-Shepard, Annemarie LU orcid and Achim, Alexis (2022) In Current Forestry Reports 8(4). p.317-332
Abstract

Purpose of Review: Producing wood of the right quality is an important part of forest management. In the same way that forest growth models are valuable decision support tools for producing desired yields, models that predict wood quality in standing trees should assist forest managers to make quality-influenced decisions. A challenge for wood quality (WQ) models is to predict the properties of potential products from standing trees, given multiple possible growing environments and silvicultural adjustments. While much research has been undertaken to model forest growth, much less work has focussed on producing wood quality models. As a result, many opportunities exist to expand our knowledge. Recent Findings: There has been an increase... (More)

Purpose of Review: Producing wood of the right quality is an important part of forest management. In the same way that forest growth models are valuable decision support tools for producing desired yields, models that predict wood quality in standing trees should assist forest managers to make quality-influenced decisions. A challenge for wood quality (WQ) models is to predict the properties of potential products from standing trees, given multiple possible growing environments and silvicultural adjustments. While much research has been undertaken to model forest growth, much less work has focussed on producing wood quality models. As a result, many opportunities exist to expand our knowledge. Recent Findings: There has been an increase in the availability and use of non-destructive methods for wood quality assessment in standing trees. In parallel, a range of new models have been proposed in the last two decades, predicting wood property variation, and as a result wood quality, using both fully empirical (statistical) and process-based (mechanistic) approaches. Summary: We review here models that predict wood quality in standing trees. Although other research is mentioned where applicable, the focus is on research done within the last 20 years. We propose a simple classification of WQ models, first into two broad groupings: fully empirical and process-based. Comprehensive, although not exhaustive, summaries of a wide range of published models in both categories are given. The question of scale is addressed with relevance to the range of possibilities which these different types of models present. We distinguish between empirical models which predict stand or tree-level wood quality and those which predict within-tree wood quality variability. In this latter group are branching models (variation up the stem) and models predicting pith-to-bark clear-wood wood property variability. In the case of process-based models, simulation of within-tree variability, and specifically, how that variability arose over time, is always necessary. We discuss how wood quality models are, or should increasingly be, part of decision support systems that aid forest managers and give some perspectives on ways to increase model impact for forest management for wood quality.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Cambial model, LiDAR, Model ensembles, Projection model, Within-tree variability, Xylogenesis, Wood quality, Forestry
in
Current Forestry Reports
volume
8
issue
4
pages
16 pages
publisher
Springer
external identifiers
  • scopus:85135942700
ISSN
2198-6436
DOI
10.1007/s40725-022-00171-0
project
Redefining the carbon sink capacity of global forests: The driving role of tree mortality
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
44bd0ebc-c428-4aa4-ba4a-837077971492
date added to LUP
2022-09-23 12:14:05
date last changed
2023-09-07 18:06:02
@article{44bd0ebc-c428-4aa4-ba4a-837077971492,
  abstract     = {{<p>Purpose of Review: Producing wood of the right quality is an important part of forest management. In the same way that forest growth models are valuable decision support tools for producing desired yields, models that predict wood quality in standing trees should assist forest managers to make quality-influenced decisions. A challenge for wood quality (WQ) models is to predict the properties of potential products from standing trees, given multiple possible growing environments and silvicultural adjustments. While much research has been undertaken to model forest growth, much less work has focussed on producing wood quality models. As a result, many opportunities exist to expand our knowledge. Recent Findings: There has been an increase in the availability and use of non-destructive methods for wood quality assessment in standing trees. In parallel, a range of new models have been proposed in the last two decades, predicting wood property variation, and as a result wood quality, using both fully empirical (statistical) and process-based (mechanistic) approaches. Summary: We review here models that predict wood quality in standing trees. Although other research is mentioned where applicable, the focus is on research done within the last 20 years. We propose a simple classification of WQ models, first into two broad groupings: fully empirical and process-based. Comprehensive, although not exhaustive, summaries of a wide range of published models in both categories are given. The question of scale is addressed with relevance to the range of possibilities which these different types of models present. We distinguish between empirical models which predict stand or tree-level wood quality and those which predict within-tree wood quality variability. In this latter group are branching models (variation up the stem) and models predicting pith-to-bark clear-wood wood property variability. In the case of process-based models, simulation of within-tree variability, and specifically, how that variability arose over time, is always necessary. We discuss how wood quality models are, or should increasingly be, part of decision support systems that aid forest managers and give some perspectives on ways to increase model impact for forest management for wood quality.</p>}},
  author       = {{Drew, David M. and Downes, Geoffrey M. and Seifert, Thomas and Eckes-Shepard, Annemarie and Achim, Alexis}},
  issn         = {{2198-6436}},
  keywords     = {{Cambial model; LiDAR; Model ensembles; Projection model; Within-tree variability; Xylogenesis; Wood quality; Forestry}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{317--332}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  series       = {{Current Forestry Reports}},
  title        = {{A Review of Progress and Applications in Wood Quality Modelling}},
  url          = {{https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/157556238/Drew_etal_WoodQualModels_Revised_FINAL_R4.docx}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s40725-022-00171-0}},
  volume       = {{8}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}