Governance innovations as social imaginaries: challenges of post-NPM
(2024) In Public Management Review 26(9). p.2680-2699- Abstract
- The effects of NPM have been criticized for decades and we are now seeing how alternative, post-NPM, governance innovations emerge. What joins these innovations is the critique against NPM and the ambition to provide new ways of governing public organizations. From a critical stance, we engage in a discussion of governance innovations from the perspective of social imaginaries and analyse post-NPM from dystopian and utopian viewpoints. We argue that the main legitimacy for post-NPM lies in it demonizing NPM, whereas a more fruitful way forward would entail incorporating elements of NPM to create a holistic governance model for the future.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/44d641c5-dfe2-46f2-a16f-f17b8639417a
- author
- Funck, Elin LU and Karlsson, Tom
- organization
- publishing date
- 2024-08-07
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- NPM, post-NPM, magic concepts, social imaginaries, governance innovation
- in
- Public Management Review
- volume
- 26
- issue
- 9
- pages
- 2680 - 2699
- publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85177472855
- ISSN
- 1471-9045
- DOI
- 10.1080/14719037.2023.2281981
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 44d641c5-dfe2-46f2-a16f-f17b8639417a
- date added to LUP
- 2023-12-18 13:23:04
- date last changed
- 2024-08-07 10:22:22
@article{44d641c5-dfe2-46f2-a16f-f17b8639417a, abstract = {{The effects of NPM have been criticized for decades and we are now seeing how alternative, post-NPM, governance innovations emerge. What joins these innovations is the critique against NPM and the ambition to provide new ways of governing public organizations. From a critical stance, we engage in a discussion of governance innovations from the perspective of social imaginaries and analyse post-NPM from dystopian and utopian viewpoints. We argue that the main legitimacy for post-NPM lies in it demonizing NPM, whereas a more fruitful way forward would entail incorporating elements of NPM to create a holistic governance model for the future.}}, author = {{Funck, Elin and Karlsson, Tom}}, issn = {{1471-9045}}, keywords = {{NPM; post-NPM; magic concepts; social imaginaries; governance innovation}}, language = {{eng}}, month = {{08}}, number = {{9}}, pages = {{2680--2699}}, publisher = {{Taylor & Francis}}, series = {{Public Management Review}}, title = {{Governance innovations as social imaginaries: challenges of post-NPM}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2281981}}, doi = {{10.1080/14719037.2023.2281981}}, volume = {{26}}, year = {{2024}}, }