Surrogate measures of insulin sensitivity vs the hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp: a meta-analysis
(2014) In Diabetologia 57(9). p.1781-1788- Abstract
- Aims/hypothesis We aimed to identify which surrogate index of insulin sensitivity has the strongest correlation with the reference measurement, the hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp (HEC), to determine which surrogate measure should be recommended for use in large-scale studies. Methods A literature search (1979-2012) was conducted to retrieve all articles reporting bivariate correlations between the HEC and surrogate measures of insulin sensitivity (in fasting samples or during the OGTT). We performed a random effects meta-analysis for each surrogate measure to integrate the correlation coefficients of the different studies. Results The OGTT-based surrogate measures with the strongest pooled correlations (r) to the HEC were the Stumvoll... (More)
- Aims/hypothesis We aimed to identify which surrogate index of insulin sensitivity has the strongest correlation with the reference measurement, the hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp (HEC), to determine which surrogate measure should be recommended for use in large-scale studies. Methods A literature search (1979-2012) was conducted to retrieve all articles reporting bivariate correlations between the HEC and surrogate measures of insulin sensitivity (in fasting samples or during the OGTT). We performed a random effects meta-analysis for each surrogate measure to integrate the correlation coefficients of the different studies. Results The OGTT-based surrogate measures with the strongest pooled correlations (r) to the HEC were the Stumvoll metabolic clearance rate (Stumvoll MCR; r=0.70 [95% CI 0.61, 0.77], n=5), oral glucose insulin sensitivity (OGIS; r=0.70 [0.57, 0.80], n=6), the Matsuda index (r=0.67 [0.61, 0.73], n=19), the Stumvoll insulin sensitivity index (Stumvoll ISI; r=0.67 [0.60, 0.72], n=8) and the Gutt index (r=0.65 [0.60, 0.69], n=6). The fasting surrogate indices that correlated most strongly with the HEC and had narrow 95% CIs were the revised QUICKI (r=0.68 [0.58, 0.77], n=7), the QUICKI (r=0.61 [0.55, 0.65], n=35), the log HOMA-IR (r=-0.60 [-0.66, -0.53], n=22) and the computer generated HOMA of insulin sensitivity (HOMA-%S; r=0.57 [0.46, 0.67], n=5). Conclusions/interpretation The revised QUICKI fasting surrogate measure appears to be as good as the OGTT-based Stumvoll MCR, OGIS, Matsuda, Stumvoll ISI and Gutt indices for estimating insulin sensitivity. It can therefore be recommended as the most appropriate index for use in large-scale clinical studies. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/4659478
- author
- Otten, Julia ; Ahrén, Bo LU and Olsson, Tommy
- organization
- publishing date
- 2014
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Glucose, Hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp, Insulin, sensitivity, Meta-analysis, Surrogate markers
- in
- Diabetologia
- volume
- 57
- issue
- 9
- pages
- 1781 - 1788
- publisher
- Springer
- external identifiers
-
- wos:000340050800006
- scopus:84905570627
- pmid:24891021
- ISSN
- 1432-0428
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00125-014-3285-x
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 14279929-7901-4423-876e-28c6c398ae75 (old id 4659478)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 10:35:23
- date last changed
- 2024-11-19 13:50:21
@article{14279929-7901-4423-876e-28c6c398ae75,
abstract = {{Aims/hypothesis We aimed to identify which surrogate index of insulin sensitivity has the strongest correlation with the reference measurement, the hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp (HEC), to determine which surrogate measure should be recommended for use in large-scale studies. Methods A literature search (1979-2012) was conducted to retrieve all articles reporting bivariate correlations between the HEC and surrogate measures of insulin sensitivity (in fasting samples or during the OGTT). We performed a random effects meta-analysis for each surrogate measure to integrate the correlation coefficients of the different studies. Results The OGTT-based surrogate measures with the strongest pooled correlations (r) to the HEC were the Stumvoll metabolic clearance rate (Stumvoll MCR; r=0.70 [95% CI 0.61, 0.77], n=5), oral glucose insulin sensitivity (OGIS; r=0.70 [0.57, 0.80], n=6), the Matsuda index (r=0.67 [0.61, 0.73], n=19), the Stumvoll insulin sensitivity index (Stumvoll ISI; r=0.67 [0.60, 0.72], n=8) and the Gutt index (r=0.65 [0.60, 0.69], n=6). The fasting surrogate indices that correlated most strongly with the HEC and had narrow 95% CIs were the revised QUICKI (r=0.68 [0.58, 0.77], n=7), the QUICKI (r=0.61 [0.55, 0.65], n=35), the log HOMA-IR (r=-0.60 [-0.66, -0.53], n=22) and the computer generated HOMA of insulin sensitivity (HOMA-%S; r=0.57 [0.46, 0.67], n=5). Conclusions/interpretation The revised QUICKI fasting surrogate measure appears to be as good as the OGTT-based Stumvoll MCR, OGIS, Matsuda, Stumvoll ISI and Gutt indices for estimating insulin sensitivity. It can therefore be recommended as the most appropriate index for use in large-scale clinical studies.}},
author = {{Otten, Julia and Ahrén, Bo and Olsson, Tommy}},
issn = {{1432-0428}},
keywords = {{Glucose; Hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp; Insulin; sensitivity; Meta-analysis; Surrogate markers}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{9}},
pages = {{1781--1788}},
publisher = {{Springer}},
series = {{Diabetologia}},
title = {{Surrogate measures of insulin sensitivity vs the hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp: a meta-analysis}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00125-014-3285-x}},
doi = {{10.1007/s00125-014-3285-x}},
volume = {{57}},
year = {{2014}},
}