Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Promise or Peril: How AI Is Discussed in International Environmental Negotiations

Kang, Yi Hyun LU orcid (2025) In Oxford Intersections: AI in Society
Abstract
Articial intelligence (AI) is widely discussed across policy sectors, including global environmental politics. At the 28th United Nations Climate Change Conference in 2023 (COP28), national governments decided to explore AI’s role in climate solutions and its associated challenges and risks through the #AI4ClimateAction Initiative. In March 2024, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution to “seize the opportunities of safe, secure and trustworthy articial intelligence systems” for sustainable development. While AI is emerging as a public policy topic in international environmental negotiations, there is a signicant knowledge gap about the background of AI discussions in the context of environmental politics. Given that the potential... (More)
Articial intelligence (AI) is widely discussed across policy sectors, including global environmental politics. At the 28th United Nations Climate Change Conference in 2023 (COP28), national governments decided to explore AI’s role in climate solutions and its associated challenges and risks through the #AI4ClimateAction Initiative. In March 2024, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution to “seize the opportunities of safe, secure and trustworthy articial intelligence systems” for sustainable development. While AI is emerging as a public policy topic in international environmental negotiations, there is a signicant knowledge gap about the background of AI discussions in the context of environmental politics. Given that the potential impacts of AI on the environment are expected to be signicant in both
positive and negative ways, it is necessary to understand which discourses are guiding the direction of AI discussions within environmental politics. This article investigates how AI is perceived by different actors in global environmental governance, particularly in the elds of climate, biodiversity, and sustainable development. The article expands knowledge about the early stage of AI discussions in environmental politics, showing that AI is generally framed as a positive technology across different elds. The discussion about AI’s negative environmental impact is marginal. This nding reveals that the current frames of AI supported by various narratives in international environmental negotiations are closely associated with techno-optimistic discourses. As the future trajectory of AI depends on how we leverage AI solutions, balanced deliberation on AI and the environment is required to make technology and sustainability walk together. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
artificial intelligence, AI, Climate change, biodiversity, sustainable development, Discourse analysis, international environmental governance
in
Oxford Intersections: AI in Society
DOI
10.1093/9780198945215.003.0028
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
484a5f0f-5997-4cd4-b538-43d04c0270bd
date added to LUP
2025-03-21 11:02:35
date last changed
2025-04-04 15:14:36
@article{484a5f0f-5997-4cd4-b538-43d04c0270bd,
  abstract     = {{Articial intelligence (AI) is widely discussed across policy sectors, including global environmental politics. At the 28th United Nations Climate Change Conference in 2023 (COP28), national governments decided to explore AI’s role in climate solutions and its associated challenges and risks through the #AI4ClimateAction Initiative. In March 2024, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution to “seize the opportunities of safe, secure and trustworthy articial intelligence systems” for sustainable development. While AI is emerging as a public policy topic in international environmental negotiations, there is a signicant knowledge gap about the background of AI discussions in the context of environmental politics. Given that the potential impacts of AI on the environment are expected to be signicant in both<br/>positive and negative ways, it is necessary to understand which discourses are guiding the direction of AI discussions within environmental politics. This article investigates how AI is perceived by different actors in global environmental governance, particularly in the elds of climate, biodiversity, and sustainable development. The article expands knowledge about the early stage of AI discussions in environmental politics, showing that AI is generally framed as a positive technology across different elds. The discussion about AI’s negative environmental impact is marginal. This nding reveals that the current frames of AI supported by various narratives in international environmental negotiations are closely associated with techno-optimistic discourses. As the future trajectory of AI depends on how we leverage AI solutions, balanced deliberation on AI and the environment is required to make technology and sustainability walk together.}},
  author       = {{Kang, Yi Hyun}},
  keywords     = {{artificial intelligence; AI; Climate change; biodiversity; sustainable development; Discourse analysis; international environmental governance}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{03}},
  series       = {{Oxford Intersections: AI in Society}},
  title        = {{Promise or Peril: How AI Is Discussed in International Environmental Negotiations}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/9780198945215.003.0028}},
  doi          = {{10.1093/9780198945215.003.0028}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}