Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Retinal Ganglion Cell Topography and Spatial Resolving Power in Echolocating and Non-Echolocating Bats

Cechetto, Clément ; De Busserolles, Fanny ; Jakobsen, Lasse LU and Warrant, Eric J. LU orcid (2020) In Brain, Behavior and Evolution 95(2). p.58-68
Abstract

Bats are nocturnal mammals known for their ability to echolocate, yet all bats can see, and most bats of the family Pteropodidae (fruit bats) do not echolocate-instead they rely mainly on vision and olfaction to forage. We investigated whether echolocating bats, given their limited reliance on vision, have poorer spatial resolving power (SRP) than pteropodids and whether tongue click echolocating fruit bats differ from non-echolocating fruit bats in terms of visual performance. We compared the number and distribution of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) as well as the maximum anatomical SRP derived from these distributions in 4 species of bats: Myotis daubentonii, a laryngeal echolocating bat from the family Vespertilionidae, Rousettus... (More)

Bats are nocturnal mammals known for their ability to echolocate, yet all bats can see, and most bats of the family Pteropodidae (fruit bats) do not echolocate-instead they rely mainly on vision and olfaction to forage. We investigated whether echolocating bats, given their limited reliance on vision, have poorer spatial resolving power (SRP) than pteropodids and whether tongue click echolocating fruit bats differ from non-echolocating fruit bats in terms of visual performance. We compared the number and distribution of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) as well as the maximum anatomical SRP derived from these distributions in 4 species of bats: Myotis daubentonii, a laryngeal echolocating bat from the family Vespertilionidae, Rousettus aegyptiacus, a tongue clicking echolocating bat from the family Pteropodidae, and Pteropus alecto and P. poliocephalus, 2 non-echolocating bats (also from the Pteropodidae). We find that all 3 pteropodids have a similar number (≈200,000 cells) and distribution of RGCs and a similar maximum SRP (≈4 cycles/degree). M. daubentonii has fewer (∼6,000 cells) and sparser RGCs than the pteropodids and thus a significantly lower SRP (0.6 cycles/degree). M. daubentonii also differs in terms of the distribution of RGCs by having a unique dorsal area of specialization in the retina. Our findings are consistent with the existing literature and suggest that M. daubentonii likely only uses vision for orientation, while for pteropodids vision is also important for foraging.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Bats, Retinal ganglion cells, Retinal topography, Spatial resolving power, Stereology
in
Brain, Behavior and Evolution
volume
95
issue
2
pages
11 pages
publisher
Karger
external identifiers
  • scopus:85091126962
  • pmid:32818939
ISSN
0006-8977
DOI
10.1159/000508863
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
4910964a-7e71-4576-9a29-75a4c5150298
date added to LUP
2021-01-12 11:18:29
date last changed
2024-05-16 02:22:35
@article{4910964a-7e71-4576-9a29-75a4c5150298,
  abstract     = {{<p>Bats are nocturnal mammals known for their ability to echolocate, yet all bats can see, and most bats of the family Pteropodidae (fruit bats) do not echolocate-instead they rely mainly on vision and olfaction to forage. We investigated whether echolocating bats, given their limited reliance on vision, have poorer spatial resolving power (SRP) than pteropodids and whether tongue click echolocating fruit bats differ from non-echolocating fruit bats in terms of visual performance. We compared the number and distribution of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) as well as the maximum anatomical SRP derived from these distributions in 4 species of bats: Myotis daubentonii, a laryngeal echolocating bat from the family Vespertilionidae, Rousettus aegyptiacus, a tongue clicking echolocating bat from the family Pteropodidae, and Pteropus alecto and P. poliocephalus, 2 non-echolocating bats (also from the Pteropodidae). We find that all 3 pteropodids have a similar number (≈200,000 cells) and distribution of RGCs and a similar maximum SRP (≈4 cycles/degree). M. daubentonii has fewer (∼6,000 cells) and sparser RGCs than the pteropodids and thus a significantly lower SRP (0.6 cycles/degree). M. daubentonii also differs in terms of the distribution of RGCs by having a unique dorsal area of specialization in the retina. Our findings are consistent with the existing literature and suggest that M. daubentonii likely only uses vision for orientation, while for pteropodids vision is also important for foraging.</p>}},
  author       = {{Cechetto, Clément and De Busserolles, Fanny and Jakobsen, Lasse and Warrant, Eric J.}},
  issn         = {{0006-8977}},
  keywords     = {{Bats; Retinal ganglion cells; Retinal topography; Spatial resolving power; Stereology}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{09}},
  number       = {{2}},
  pages        = {{58--68}},
  publisher    = {{Karger}},
  series       = {{Brain, Behavior and Evolution}},
  title        = {{Retinal Ganglion Cell Topography and Spatial Resolving Power in Echolocating and Non-Echolocating Bats}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000508863}},
  doi          = {{10.1159/000508863}},
  volume       = {{95}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}