Advanced

Blue flags", development of a short clinical questionnaire on work-related psychosocial risk factors - A validation study in primary care

Post Sennehed, Charlotte LU ; Gard, Gunvor LU ; Holmberg, Sara; Stigmar, Kjerstin LU ; Forsbrand, Malin LU and Grahn, Birgitta LU (2017) In BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 18(1).
Abstract

Background: Working conditions substantially influence health, work ability and sick leave. Useful instruments to help clinicians pay attention to working conditions are lacking in primary care (PC). The aim of this study was to test the validity of a short "Blue flags" questionnaire, which focuses on work-related psychosocial risk factors and any potential need for contacts and/or actions at the workplace. Methods: From the original"The General Nordic Questionnaire" (QPSNordic) the research group identified five content areas with a total of 51 items which were considered to be most relevant focusing on work-related psychosocial risk factors. Fourteen items were selected from the identified QPSNordic content areas... (More)

Background: Working conditions substantially influence health, work ability and sick leave. Useful instruments to help clinicians pay attention to working conditions are lacking in primary care (PC). The aim of this study was to test the validity of a short "Blue flags" questionnaire, which focuses on work-related psychosocial risk factors and any potential need for contacts and/or actions at the workplace. Methods: From the original"The General Nordic Questionnaire" (QPSNordic) the research group identified five content areas with a total of 51 items which were considered to be most relevant focusing on work-related psychosocial risk factors. Fourteen items were selected from the identified QPSNordic content areas and organised in a short questionnaire "Blue flags". These 14 items were validated towards the 51 QPSNordic items. Content validity was reviewed by a professional panel and a patient panel. Structural and concurrent validity were also tested within a randomised clinical trial. Results: The two panels (n = 111) considered the 14 psychosocial items to be relevant. A four-factor model was extracted with an explained variance of 25.2%, 14.9%, 10.9% and 8.3% respectively. All 14 items showed satisfactory loadings on all factors. Concerning concurrent validity the overall correlation was very strong rs = 0.87 (p < 0.001).). Correlations were moderately strong for factor one, rs = 0.62 (p < 0.001) and factor two, rs = 0.74 (p < 0.001). Factor three and factor four were weaker, bur still fair and significant at rs = 0.53 (p < 0.001) and rs = 0.41 (p < 0.001) respectively. The internal consistency of the whole "Blue flags" was good with Cronbach's alpha of 0.76. Conclusions: The content, structural and concurrent validity were satisfactory in this first step of development of the "Blue flags" questionnaire. In summary, the overall validity is considered acceptable. Testing in clinical contexts and in other patient populations is recommended to ensure predictive validity and usefulness.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Psychosocial, Questionnaire, Validity, Work ability, Work-related risk factors
in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
volume
18
issue
1
publisher
BioMed Central
external identifiers
  • scopus:85025662398
  • wos:000406630800002
ISSN
1471-2474
DOI
10.1186/s12891-017-1677-z
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
4d308c23-817d-4c6b-bef0-8e08ccc18be0
date added to LUP
2017-08-24 15:27:29
date last changed
2018-01-07 12:15:59
@article{4d308c23-817d-4c6b-bef0-8e08ccc18be0,
  abstract     = {<p>Background: Working conditions substantially influence health, work ability and sick leave. Useful instruments to help clinicians pay attention to working conditions are lacking in primary care (PC). The aim of this study was to test the validity of a short "Blue flags" questionnaire, which focuses on work-related psychosocial risk factors and any potential need for contacts and/or actions at the workplace. Methods: From the original"The General Nordic Questionnaire" (QPS<sub>Nordic</sub>) the research group identified five content areas with a total of 51 items which were considered to be most relevant focusing on work-related psychosocial risk factors. Fourteen items were selected from the identified QPS<sub>Nordic</sub> content areas and organised in a short questionnaire "Blue flags". These 14 items were validated towards the 51 QPS<sub>Nordic</sub> items. Content validity was reviewed by a professional panel and a patient panel. Structural and concurrent validity were also tested within a randomised clinical trial. Results: The two panels (n = 111) considered the 14 psychosocial items to be relevant. A four-factor model was extracted with an explained variance of 25.2%, 14.9%, 10.9% and 8.3% respectively. All 14 items showed satisfactory loadings on all factors. Concerning concurrent validity the overall correlation was very strong r<sub>s</sub> = 0.87 (p &lt; 0.001).). Correlations were moderately strong for factor one, r<sub>s</sub> = 0.62 (p &lt; 0.001) and factor two, r<sub>s</sub> = 0.74 (p &lt; 0.001). Factor three and factor four were weaker, bur still fair and significant at r<sub>s</sub> = 0.53 (p &lt; 0.001) and r<sub>s</sub> = 0.41 (p &lt; 0.001) respectively. The internal consistency of the whole "Blue flags" was good with Cronbach's alpha of 0.76. Conclusions: The content, structural and concurrent validity were satisfactory in this first step of development of the "Blue flags" questionnaire. In summary, the overall validity is considered acceptable. Testing in clinical contexts and in other patient populations is recommended to ensure predictive validity and usefulness.</p>},
  articleno    = {318},
  author       = {Post Sennehed, Charlotte and Gard, Gunvor and Holmberg, Sara and Stigmar, Kjerstin and Forsbrand, Malin and Grahn, Birgitta},
  issn         = {1471-2474},
  keyword      = {Psychosocial,Questionnaire,Validity,Work ability,Work-related risk factors},
  language     = {eng},
  month        = {07},
  number       = {1},
  publisher    = {BioMed Central},
  series       = {BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders},
  title        = {Blue flags", development of a short clinical questionnaire on work-related psychosocial risk factors - A validation study in primary care},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1677-z},
  volume       = {18},
  year         = {2017},
}