Explaining own and others' behavior in a controversial issue: Animal experimentation.
(2001) In Journal of Social Psychology 141(6). p.693-713- Abstract
- The authors investigated how 2 groups with different attitudes toward animal experimentation-- researchers who conducted animal experiments and members of animal welfare organizations who protested against animal experiments-- made attributions for the behavior of the opposing group. The 2 groups showed an actor-observer effect, mentioning more internal causes for the opponents' behavior and more external causes for their own behavior. Both groups were able to take the other's perspective, resulting in a reversed actor-observer effect. The less involved participants followed the pattern of ratings of the group whose attitudes corresponded to their own. In particular, the participants with a negative attitude toward animal experimentation... (More)
- The authors investigated how 2 groups with different attitudes toward animal experimentation-- researchers who conducted animal experiments and members of animal welfare organizations who protested against animal experiments-- made attributions for the behavior of the opposing group. The 2 groups showed an actor-observer effect, mentioning more internal causes for the opponents' behavior and more external causes for their own behavior. Both groups were able to take the other's perspective, resulting in a reversed actor-observer effect. The less involved participants followed the pattern of ratings of the group whose attitudes corresponded to their own. In particular, the participants with a negative attitude toward animal experimentation rated researchers' behavior as more internally caused than did those with a positive attitude. The results illustrated how the participants formed and defended attitudes in a social context. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
http://lup.lub.lu.se/record/4f730f7c-d87c-42e9-8d3e-88687ae1bff7
- author
- Blom Kemdal, Anna LU and Montgomery, Henry
- publishing date
- 2001-12
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- animal experimentation, actor-observer effect, attitude, attribution
- in
- Journal of Social Psychology
- volume
- 141
- issue
- 6
- pages
- 21 pages
- publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:0035528381
- ISSN
- 0022-4545
- DOI
- 10.1080/00224540109600582
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- no
- id
- 4f730f7c-d87c-42e9-8d3e-88687ae1bff7
- date added to LUP
- 2017-02-10 10:59:35
- date last changed
- 2018-01-07 11:49:15
@article{4f730f7c-d87c-42e9-8d3e-88687ae1bff7,
abstract = {The authors investigated how 2 groups with different attitudes toward animal experimentation-- researchers who conducted animal experiments and members of animal welfare organizations who protested against animal experiments-- made attributions for the behavior of the opposing group. The 2 groups showed an actor-observer effect, mentioning more internal causes for the opponents' behavior and more external causes for their own behavior. Both groups were able to take the other's perspective, resulting in a reversed actor-observer effect. The less involved participants followed the pattern of ratings of the group whose attitudes corresponded to their own. In particular, the participants with a negative attitude toward animal experimentation rated researchers' behavior as more internally caused than did those with a positive attitude. The results illustrated how the participants formed and defended attitudes in a social context. },
articleno = {2002-00656-001},
author = {Blom Kemdal, Anna and Montgomery, Henry},
issn = {0022-4545},
keyword = {animal experimentation,actor-observer effect,attitude,attribution},
language = {eng},
number = {6},
pages = {693--713},
publisher = {Taylor & Francis},
series = {Journal of Social Psychology},
title = {Explaining own and others' behavior in a controversial issue: Animal experimentation.},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224540109600582},
volume = {141},
year = {2001},
}