Advanced

The ergativity parameter

Holmer, Arthur LU (2001) In Working Papers, Lund University, Dept. of Linguistics 48.
Abstract
Within the field of syntactic typology, which seeks to describe and classify the range of grammatical phenomena extant in the world’s languages, one of the most important problems is whether or not a given language is ergative. Within a generative approach, a further problem is accounting for the existence of ergative languages by the definition of what may be termed an ‘ergativity parameter’. This question is further complicated by the fact that ergative languages in

themselves do not represent a uniform pattern. Rather, the term ‘ergative languages’ might more aptly be replaced by a wording such as ‘languages which display certain ergative characteristics’. In fact, as has been noted by Dixon 1994, most languages which have... (More)
Within the field of syntactic typology, which seeks to describe and classify the range of grammatical phenomena extant in the world’s languages, one of the most important problems is whether or not a given language is ergative. Within a generative approach, a further problem is accounting for the existence of ergative languages by the definition of what may be termed an ‘ergativity parameter’. This question is further complicated by the fact that ergative languages in

themselves do not represent a uniform pattern. Rather, the term ‘ergative languages’ might more aptly be replaced by a wording such as ‘languages which display certain ergative characteristics’. In fact, as has been noted by Dixon 1994, most languages which have received the label ‘ergative’ in the literature display both ergative and accusative characteristics. Thus, the casemarking system may be ergative, while the agreement system is accusative, or both may be ergative, while interclausal coreference properties pattern accusatively, or, each of these phenomena may vary depending on other factors (the phenomenon known as split ergativity, cf section 2.3). For this reason it makes little sense to define a parameter which simultaneously causes an ergative and excludes an accusative alignment. Rather, a parameter for ergativity should be concerned with accounting for the fact that a given language may display a certain amount of ergative behaviour, regardless of whether this behaviour pervades the entire grammar of the language or is restricted to a single subdomain (be it a single grammatical phenomenon, or a single construction). (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Working Paper
publication status
published
subject
in
Working Papers, Lund University, Dept. of Linguistics
volume
48
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
a287f549-86d3-4fe6-9605-f290a45df14a (old id 528661)
alternative location
http://www.ling.lu.se/disseminations/pdf/48/Holmer.pdf
date added to LUP
2007-09-27 16:35:08
date last changed
2016-04-16 12:33:59
@misc{a287f549-86d3-4fe6-9605-f290a45df14a,
  abstract     = {Within the field of syntactic typology, which seeks to describe and classify the range of grammatical phenomena extant in the world’s languages, one of the most important problems is whether or not a given language is ergative. Within a generative approach, a further problem is accounting for the existence of ergative languages by the definition of what may be termed an ‘ergativity parameter’. This question is further complicated by the fact that ergative languages in<br/><br>
themselves do not represent a uniform pattern. Rather, the term ‘ergative languages’ might more aptly be replaced by a wording such as ‘languages which display certain ergative characteristics’. In fact, as has been noted by Dixon 1994, most languages which have received the label ‘ergative’ in the literature display both ergative and accusative characteristics. Thus, the casemarking system may be ergative, while the agreement system is accusative, or both may be ergative, while interclausal coreference properties pattern accusatively, or, each of these phenomena may vary depending on other factors (the phenomenon known as split ergativity, cf section 2.3). For this reason it makes little sense to define a parameter which simultaneously causes an ergative and excludes an accusative alignment. Rather, a parameter for ergativity should be concerned with accounting for the fact that a given language may display a certain amount of ergative behaviour, regardless of whether this behaviour pervades the entire grammar of the language or is restricted to a single subdomain (be it a single grammatical phenomenon, or a single construction).},
  author       = {Holmer, Arthur},
  language     = {eng},
  note         = {Working Paper},
  series       = {Working Papers, Lund University, Dept. of Linguistics},
  title        = {The ergativity parameter},
  volume       = {48},
  year         = {2001},
}