Prohibition:negative imperatives and the parametric typology of negation
(1999) In Working Papers, Lund University, Dept. of Linguistics 47.- Abstract
- A number of researchers have offered hypotheses about the syntactic relationship between Tense and Negation. Zanuttini 1996, for example, has argued that the head NEG may only occur in the presence of Tense. This paper examines data on negation in 15 languages which has been collected in an ongoing typological research project, PARATYP. The study focuses on the difference between prohibitive and non-prohibitive negations, since the imperative form in some languages may or may not include the feature Tense. Our data confirms Zanuttini’s hypothesis that the relationship between Tense and Negation is mirrored in the patterns of cooccurence of these two categories. We identify two parametric types of
Negation based on Zanuttini’s two... (More) - A number of researchers have offered hypotheses about the syntactic relationship between Tense and Negation. Zanuttini 1996, for example, has argued that the head NEG may only occur in the presence of Tense. This paper examines data on negation in 15 languages which has been collected in an ongoing typological research project, PARATYP. The study focuses on the difference between prohibitive and non-prohibitive negations, since the imperative form in some languages may or may not include the feature Tense. Our data confirms Zanuttini’s hypothesis that the relationship between Tense and Negation is mirrored in the patterns of cooccurence of these two categories. We identify two parametric types of
Negation based on Zanuttini’s two types and investigate whether it is possible to use the distribution of the prohibitive negative as a diagnostic tool for determining the Negation type found in each language. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/528687
- author
- Dooley Collberg, Sheila and Håkansson, Gisela LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 1999
- type
- Working paper/Preprint
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Working Papers, Lund University, Dept. of Linguistics
- volume
- 47
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- additional info
- The information about affiliations in this record was updated in December 2015. The record was previously connected to the following departments: Linguistics and Phonetics (015010003)
- id
- 77b208a8-528c-4b4d-a781-0acb47d87907 (old id 528687)
- alternative location
- http://www.ling.lu.se/disseminations/pdf/47/DooleyCollberg_Hakansson.pdf
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-04 14:11:09
- date last changed
- 2018-11-21 21:18:46
@misc{77b208a8-528c-4b4d-a781-0acb47d87907, abstract = {{A number of researchers have offered hypotheses about the syntactic relationship between Tense and Negation. Zanuttini 1996, for example, has argued that the head NEG may only occur in the presence of Tense. This paper examines data on negation in 15 languages which has been collected in an ongoing typological research project, PARATYP. The study focuses on the difference between prohibitive and non-prohibitive negations, since the imperative form in some languages may or may not include the feature Tense. Our data confirms Zanuttini’s hypothesis that the relationship between Tense and Negation is mirrored in the patterns of cooccurence of these two categories. We identify two parametric types of<br/><br> Negation based on Zanuttini’s two types and investigate whether it is possible to use the distribution of the prohibitive negative as a diagnostic tool for determining the Negation type found in each language.}}, author = {{Dooley Collberg, Sheila and Håkansson, Gisela}}, language = {{eng}}, note = {{Working Paper}}, series = {{Working Papers, Lund University, Dept. of Linguistics}}, title = {{Prohibition:negative imperatives and the parametric typology of negation}}, url = {{https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/6300704/624444.pdf}}, volume = {{47}}, year = {{1999}}, }