The Memory and Affective Flexibility Task : a new behavioral tool to assess neurocognitive processes implicated in emotion-related impulsivity and internalizing symptoms
(2025) In Frontiers in Psychiatry 16.- Abstract
Background: Cognitive rigidity and working memory impairment are established features of internalizing syndromes. Growing evidence suggests that deficits in affective control –cognitive control in the context of emotion – may underpin elevated emotion-related impulsivity in various psychiatric disorders. Objective: This study examines two components of affective control (affective flexibility and emotional working memory) as potential neurocognitive processes linking emotion-related impulsivity to internalizing psychopathology. Method: Undergraduate participants (analysis n = 120) completed the Memory and Affective Flexibility Task (MAFT), a novel behavioral assessment designed to assess hot cognition in affective flexibility and... (More)
Background: Cognitive rigidity and working memory impairment are established features of internalizing syndromes. Growing evidence suggests that deficits in affective control –cognitive control in the context of emotion – may underpin elevated emotion-related impulsivity in various psychiatric disorders. Objective: This study examines two components of affective control (affective flexibility and emotional working memory) as potential neurocognitive processes linking emotion-related impulsivity to internalizing psychopathology. Method: Undergraduate participants (analysis n = 120) completed the Memory and Affective Flexibility Task (MAFT), a novel behavioral assessment designed to assess hot cognition in affective flexibility and emotional working memory performance, alongside self-report measures of impulsivity and symptoms of internalizing disorders. Results: Structural equation modeling suggested that less accurate working memory during neutral trials (cool cognition) was associated with more symptoms of internalizing psychopathology. However, effects of hot working memory and affective flexibility were not significantly related to emotion-related impulsivity or psychopathology scores. Conclusions: Although findings provide no support for the validity of MAFT indices of hot cognition, these results replicate and extend work on the importance of cool working memory and emotion-related impulsivity as correlates of psychopathology.
(Less)
- author
- Allen, Kenneth J.D. ; Elliott, Matthew V. ; Ronold, Eivind H. ; Rajgopal, Nandini A. ; Hammar, Åsa LU and Johnson, Sheri L.
- organization
- publishing date
- 2025
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- affective flexibility, anxiety, cognitive control, depression, emotion regulation, emotion-related impulsivity, internalizing, switching
- in
- Frontiers in Psychiatry
- volume
- 16
- article number
- 1456691
- publisher
- Frontiers Media S. A.
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85218211853
- ISSN
- 1664-0640
- DOI
- 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1456691
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 52930611-35be-42c4-a34c-f8d6d840b79b
- date added to LUP
- 2025-07-03 10:41:29
- date last changed
- 2025-07-03 10:42:44
@article{52930611-35be-42c4-a34c-f8d6d840b79b,
abstract = {{<p>Background: Cognitive rigidity and working memory impairment are established features of internalizing syndromes. Growing evidence suggests that deficits in affective control –cognitive control in the context of emotion – may underpin elevated emotion-related impulsivity in various psychiatric disorders. Objective: This study examines two components of affective control (affective flexibility and emotional working memory) as potential neurocognitive processes linking emotion-related impulsivity to internalizing psychopathology. Method: Undergraduate participants (analysis n = 120) completed the Memory and Affective Flexibility Task (MAFT), a novel behavioral assessment designed to assess hot cognition in affective flexibility and emotional working memory performance, alongside self-report measures of impulsivity and symptoms of internalizing disorders. Results: Structural equation modeling suggested that less accurate working memory during neutral trials (cool cognition) was associated with more symptoms of internalizing psychopathology. However, effects of hot working memory and affective flexibility were not significantly related to emotion-related impulsivity or psychopathology scores. Conclusions: Although findings provide no support for the validity of MAFT indices of hot cognition, these results replicate and extend work on the importance of cool working memory and emotion-related impulsivity as correlates of psychopathology.</p>}},
author = {{Allen, Kenneth J.D. and Elliott, Matthew V. and Ronold, Eivind H. and Rajgopal, Nandini A. and Hammar, Åsa and Johnson, Sheri L.}},
issn = {{1664-0640}},
keywords = {{affective flexibility; anxiety; cognitive control; depression; emotion regulation; emotion-related impulsivity; internalizing; switching}},
language = {{eng}},
publisher = {{Frontiers Media S. A.}},
series = {{Frontiers in Psychiatry}},
title = {{The Memory and Affective Flexibility Task : a new behavioral tool to assess neurocognitive processes implicated in emotion-related impulsivity and internalizing symptoms}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1456691}},
doi = {{10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1456691}},
volume = {{16}},
year = {{2025}},
}