Phenology of two interdependent traits in migratory birds in response to climate change.
(2015) In Royal Society of London. Proceedings B. Biological Sciences 282(1807).- Abstract
- In migratory birds, arrival date and hatching date are two key phenological markers that have responded to global warming. A body of knowledge exists relating these traits to evolutionary pressures. In this study, we formalize this knowledge into general mathematical assumptions, and use them in an ecoevolutionary model. In contrast to previous models, this study novelty accounts for both traits-arrival date and hatching date-and the interdependence between them, revealing when one, the other or both will respond to climate. For all models sharing the assumptions, the following phenological responses will occur. First, if the nestling-prey peak is late enough, hatching is synchronous with, and arrival date evolves independently of, prey... (More)
- In migratory birds, arrival date and hatching date are two key phenological markers that have responded to global warming. A body of knowledge exists relating these traits to evolutionary pressures. In this study, we formalize this knowledge into general mathematical assumptions, and use them in an ecoevolutionary model. In contrast to previous models, this study novelty accounts for both traits-arrival date and hatching date-and the interdependence between them, revealing when one, the other or both will respond to climate. For all models sharing the assumptions, the following phenological responses will occur. First, if the nestling-prey peak is late enough, hatching is synchronous with, and arrival date evolves independently of, prey phenology. Second, when resource availability constrains the length of the pre-laying period, hatching is adaptively asynchronous with prey phenology. Predictions for both traits compare well with empirical observations. In response to advancing prey phenology, arrival date may advance, remain unchanged, or even become delayed; the latter occurring when egg-laying resources are only available relatively late in the season. The model shows that asynchronous hatching and unresponsive arrival date are not sufficient evidence that phenological adaptation is constrained. The work provides a framework for exploring microevolution of interdependent phenological traits. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/5340880
- author
- Kristensen, Nadiah LU ; Johansson, Jacob LU ; Ripa, Jörgen LU and Jonzén, Niclas LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2015
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- Royal Society of London. Proceedings B. Biological Sciences
- volume
- 282
- issue
- 1807
- publisher
- Royal Society Publishing
- external identifiers
-
- pmid:25904668
- wos:000353351100010
- scopus:84928914680
- pmid:25904668
- ISSN
- 1471-2954
- DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.2015.0288
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- d4f484a3-dfeb-4334-8675-1890a267915c (old id 5340880)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 10:13:03
- date last changed
- 2022-03-04 17:22:49
@article{d4f484a3-dfeb-4334-8675-1890a267915c, abstract = {{In migratory birds, arrival date and hatching date are two key phenological markers that have responded to global warming. A body of knowledge exists relating these traits to evolutionary pressures. In this study, we formalize this knowledge into general mathematical assumptions, and use them in an ecoevolutionary model. In contrast to previous models, this study novelty accounts for both traits-arrival date and hatching date-and the interdependence between them, revealing when one, the other or both will respond to climate. For all models sharing the assumptions, the following phenological responses will occur. First, if the nestling-prey peak is late enough, hatching is synchronous with, and arrival date evolves independently of, prey phenology. Second, when resource availability constrains the length of the pre-laying period, hatching is adaptively asynchronous with prey phenology. Predictions for both traits compare well with empirical observations. In response to advancing prey phenology, arrival date may advance, remain unchanged, or even become delayed; the latter occurring when egg-laying resources are only available relatively late in the season. The model shows that asynchronous hatching and unresponsive arrival date are not sufficient evidence that phenological adaptation is constrained. The work provides a framework for exploring microevolution of interdependent phenological traits.}}, author = {{Kristensen, Nadiah and Johansson, Jacob and Ripa, Jörgen and Jonzén, Niclas}}, issn = {{1471-2954}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{1807}}, publisher = {{Royal Society Publishing}}, series = {{Royal Society of London. Proceedings B. Biological Sciences}}, title = {{Phenology of two interdependent traits in migratory birds in response to climate change.}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.0288}}, doi = {{10.1098/rspb.2015.0288}}, volume = {{282}}, year = {{2015}}, }