Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Analytical performance of aPROMISE : automated anatomic contextualization, detection, and quantification of [18F]DCFPyL (PSMA) imaging for standardized reporting

Johnsson, Kerstin LU ; Brynolfsson, Johan LU ; Sahlstedt, Hannicka LU ; Nickols, Nicholas G. ; Rettig, Matthew ; Probst, Stephan ; Morris, Michael J. ; Bjartell, Anders LU ; Eiber, Mathias and Anand, Aseem LU (2022) In European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 49(3). p.1041-1051
Abstract

Purpose: The application of automated image analyses could improve and facilitate standardization and consistency of quantification in [18F]DCFPyL (PSMA) PET/CT scans. In the current study, we analytically validated aPROMISE, a software as a medical device that segments organs in low-dose CT images with deep learning, and subsequently detects and quantifies potential pathological lesions in PSMA PET/CT. Methods: To evaluate the deep learning algorithm, the automated segmentations of the low-dose CT component of PSMA PET/CT scans from 20 patients were compared to manual segmentations. Dice scores were used to quantify the similarities between the automated and manual segmentations. Next, the automated quantification of tracer... (More)

Purpose: The application of automated image analyses could improve and facilitate standardization and consistency of quantification in [18F]DCFPyL (PSMA) PET/CT scans. In the current study, we analytically validated aPROMISE, a software as a medical device that segments organs in low-dose CT images with deep learning, and subsequently detects and quantifies potential pathological lesions in PSMA PET/CT. Methods: To evaluate the deep learning algorithm, the automated segmentations of the low-dose CT component of PSMA PET/CT scans from 20 patients were compared to manual segmentations. Dice scores were used to quantify the similarities between the automated and manual segmentations. Next, the automated quantification of tracer uptake in the reference organs and detection and pre-segmentation of potential lesions were evaluated in 339 patients with prostate cancer, who were all enrolled in the phase II/III OSPREY study. Three nuclear medicine physicians performed the retrospective independent reads of OSPREY images with aPROMISE. Quantitative consistency was assessed by the pairwise Pearson correlations and standard deviation between the readers and aPROMISE. The sensitivity of detection and pre-segmentation of potential lesions was evaluated by determining the percent of manually selected abnormal lesions that were automatically detected by aPROMISE. Results: The Dice scores for bone segmentations ranged from 0.88 to 0.95. The Dice scores of the PSMA PET/CT reference organs, thoracic aorta and liver, were 0.89 and 0.97, respectively. Dice scores of other visceral organs, including prostate, were observed to be above 0.79. The Pearson correlation for blood pool reference was higher between any manual reader and aPROMISE, than between any pair of manual readers. The standard deviations of reference organ uptake across all patients as determined by aPROMISE (SD = 0.21 blood pool and SD = 1.16 liver) were lower compared to those of the manual readers. Finally, the sensitivity of aPROMISE detection and pre-segmentation was 91.5% for regional lymph nodes, 90.6% for all lymph nodes, and 86.7% for bone in metastatic patients. Conclusion: In this analytical study, we demonstrated the segmentation accuracy of the deep learning algorithm, the consistency in quantitative assessment across multiple readers, and the high sensitivity in detecting potential lesions. The study provides a foundational framework for clinical evaluation of aPROMISE in standardized reporting of PSMA PET/CT.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
aPROMISE, PSMA PET/CT evaluation, Segmentation, Standardized reporting
in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
volume
49
issue
3
pages
1041 - 1051
publisher
Springer
external identifiers
  • scopus:85113933270
  • pmid:34463809
ISSN
1619-7070
DOI
10.1007/s00259-021-05497-8
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
53fadeca-99d7-4ee7-b62a-1589b56a5bf4
date added to LUP
2021-09-23 15:34:52
date last changed
2024-06-15 16:46:46
@article{53fadeca-99d7-4ee7-b62a-1589b56a5bf4,
  abstract     = {{<p>Purpose: The application of automated image analyses could improve and facilitate standardization and consistency of quantification in [<sup>18</sup>F]DCFPyL (PSMA) PET/CT scans. In the current study, we analytically validated aPROMISE, a software as a medical device that segments organs in low-dose CT images with deep learning, and subsequently detects and quantifies potential pathological lesions in PSMA PET/CT. Methods: To evaluate the deep learning algorithm, the automated segmentations of the low-dose CT component of PSMA PET/CT scans from 20 patients were compared to manual segmentations. Dice scores were used to quantify the similarities between the automated and manual segmentations. Next, the automated quantification of tracer uptake in the reference organs and detection and pre-segmentation of potential lesions were evaluated in 339 patients with prostate cancer, who were all enrolled in the phase II/III OSPREY study. Three nuclear medicine physicians performed the retrospective independent reads of OSPREY images with aPROMISE. Quantitative consistency was assessed by the pairwise Pearson correlations and standard deviation between the readers and aPROMISE. The sensitivity of detection and pre-segmentation of potential lesions was evaluated by determining the percent of manually selected abnormal lesions that were automatically detected by aPROMISE. Results: The Dice scores for bone segmentations ranged from 0.88 to 0.95. The Dice scores of the PSMA PET/CT reference organs, thoracic aorta and liver, were 0.89 and 0.97, respectively. Dice scores of other visceral organs, including prostate, were observed to be above 0.79. The Pearson correlation for blood pool reference was higher between any manual reader and aPROMISE, than between any pair of manual readers. The standard deviations of reference organ uptake across all patients as determined by aPROMISE (SD = 0.21 blood pool and SD = 1.16 liver) were lower compared to those of the manual readers. Finally, the sensitivity of aPROMISE detection and pre-segmentation was 91.5% for regional lymph nodes, 90.6% for all lymph nodes, and 86.7% for bone in metastatic patients. Conclusion: In this analytical study, we demonstrated the segmentation accuracy of the deep learning algorithm, the consistency in quantitative assessment across multiple readers, and the high sensitivity in detecting potential lesions. The study provides a foundational framework for clinical evaluation of aPROMISE in standardized reporting of PSMA PET/CT.</p>}},
  author       = {{Johnsson, Kerstin and Brynolfsson, Johan and Sahlstedt, Hannicka and Nickols, Nicholas G. and Rettig, Matthew and Probst, Stephan and Morris, Michael J. and Bjartell, Anders and Eiber, Mathias and Anand, Aseem}},
  issn         = {{1619-7070}},
  keywords     = {{aPROMISE; PSMA PET/CT evaluation; Segmentation; Standardized reporting}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{1041--1051}},
  publisher    = {{Springer}},
  series       = {{European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging}},
  title        = {{Analytical performance of aPROMISE : automated anatomic contextualization, detection, and quantification of [<sup>18</sup>F]DCFPyL (PSMA) imaging for standardized reporting}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05497-8}},
  doi          = {{10.1007/s00259-021-05497-8}},
  volume       = {{49}},
  year         = {{2022}},
}