Electoral Cycles in Government Policy Making : Strategic Timing of Austerity Reform Measures in Western Europe
(2021) In British Journal of Political Science 51(1). p.331-352- Abstract
This article investigates whether governing parties strategically time austerity policies to help them win re-election. It contributes to existing research by focusing directly on government policy output, analyzing over 1,200 welfare and taxation austerity measures in thirteen Western European countries over twenty years. In line with previous research, the authors find that governments become less likely to introduce austerity measures as elections approach. The study introduces original hypotheses about which governments have the ability and opportunity to strategically time policy decisions. The authors suggest that minimal winning cabinets with leadership change (new prime ministers) face less complex bargaining environments and... (More)
This article investigates whether governing parties strategically time austerity policies to help them win re-election. It contributes to existing research by focusing directly on government policy output, analyzing over 1,200 welfare and taxation austerity measures in thirteen Western European countries over twenty years. In line with previous research, the authors find that governments become less likely to introduce austerity measures as elections approach. The study introduces original hypotheses about which governments have the ability and opportunity to strategically time policy decisions. The authors suggest that minimal winning cabinets with leadership change (new prime ministers) face less complex bargaining environments and can credibly shift responsibility for austerity measures to the preceding government. The empirical analyses show that these governments are most likely to strategically time austerity policies.
(Less)
- author
- Strobl, Daniel ; Bäck, Hanna LU ; Müller, Wolfgang C. and Angelova, Mariyana
- organization
- publishing date
- 2021
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- austerity reforms, electoral cycles, social policy, taxation policy, Western Europe
- in
- British Journal of Political Science
- volume
- 51
- issue
- 1
- pages
- 22 pages
- publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85099957891
- ISSN
- 0007-1234
- DOI
- 10.1017/S0007123419000073
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 5893a135-19e1-44ac-a31a-4c76884cd411
- date added to LUP
- 2021-02-08 12:55:23
- date last changed
- 2024-02-17 14:26:43
@article{5893a135-19e1-44ac-a31a-4c76884cd411, abstract = {{<p>This article investigates whether governing parties strategically time austerity policies to help them win re-election. It contributes to existing research by focusing directly on government policy output, analyzing over 1,200 welfare and taxation austerity measures in thirteen Western European countries over twenty years. In line with previous research, the authors find that governments become less likely to introduce austerity measures as elections approach. The study introduces original hypotheses about which governments have the ability and opportunity to strategically time policy decisions. The authors suggest that minimal winning cabinets with leadership change (new prime ministers) face less complex bargaining environments and can credibly shift responsibility for austerity measures to the preceding government. The empirical analyses show that these governments are most likely to strategically time austerity policies. </p>}}, author = {{Strobl, Daniel and Bäck, Hanna and Müller, Wolfgang C. and Angelova, Mariyana}}, issn = {{0007-1234}}, keywords = {{austerity reforms; electoral cycles; social policy; taxation policy; Western Europe}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{1}}, pages = {{331--352}}, publisher = {{Cambridge University Press}}, series = {{British Journal of Political Science}}, title = {{Electoral Cycles in Government Policy Making : Strategic Timing of Austerity Reform Measures in Western Europe}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007123419000073}}, doi = {{10.1017/S0007123419000073}}, volume = {{51}}, year = {{2021}}, }