Subjective Judgment and Gender Bias in Advice: Evidence from the Laboratory
(2020) In Working Papers- Abstract
- Better understanding and reducing gender gaps in the labor market remains an important policy goal. We study the role of advice in sustaining these gender gaps using a laboratory experiment. In the experiment, “advisers” advise “workers” to choose between a more ambitious and a less ambitious task based on the worker’s subjective self-assessment. We expected female workers to be less confident and advisers to hold gender stereotypes, leading to a gender bias in advice. However, we find no evidence that women are less confident or that advice is gender-biased. Our results contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms driving gender differences in the labor market. They also call for caution when making general interpretations of... (More)
- Better understanding and reducing gender gaps in the labor market remains an important policy goal. We study the role of advice in sustaining these gender gaps using a laboratory experiment. In the experiment, “advisers” advise “workers” to choose between a more ambitious and a less ambitious task based on the worker’s subjective self-assessment. We expected female workers to be less confident and advisers to hold gender stereotypes, leading to a gender bias in advice. However, we find no evidence that women are less confident or that advice is gender-biased. Our results contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms driving gender differences in the labor market. They also call for caution when making general interpretations of research findings pointing to a gender bias in specific settings. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/58d70a71-edb4-43aa-9078-62fe1720f470
- author
- Silva Goncalves, Juliana
and van Veldhuizen, Roel
LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2020-12-14
- type
- Working paper/Preprint
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- advice, subjective judgment, gender bias, C91, D91, J16
- in
- Working Papers
- issue
- 2020:27
- pages
- 57 pages
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 58d70a71-edb4-43aa-9078-62fe1720f470
- date added to LUP
- 2020-12-16 09:52:17
- date last changed
- 2025-04-04 14:15:17
@misc{58d70a71-edb4-43aa-9078-62fe1720f470, abstract = {{Better understanding and reducing gender gaps in the labor market remains an important policy goal. We study the role of advice in sustaining these gender gaps using a laboratory experiment. In the experiment, “advisers” advise “workers” to choose between a more ambitious and a less ambitious task based on the worker’s subjective self-assessment. We expected female workers to be less confident and advisers to hold gender stereotypes, leading to a gender bias in advice. However, we find no evidence that women are less confident or that advice is gender-biased. Our results contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms driving gender differences in the labor market. They also call for caution when making general interpretations of research findings pointing to a gender bias in specific settings.}}, author = {{Silva Goncalves, Juliana and van Veldhuizen, Roel}}, keywords = {{advice; subjective judgment; gender bias; C91; D91; J16}}, language = {{eng}}, month = {{12}}, note = {{Working Paper}}, number = {{2020:27}}, series = {{Working Papers}}, title = {{Subjective Judgment and Gender Bias in Advice: Evidence from the Laboratory}}, url = {{https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/files/194592700/WP20_27.pdf}}, year = {{2020}}, }