Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Exposing the distinctive modular behavior of β-strands and α-helices in folded proteins

Wang, Huabing ; Logan, Derek T. LU orcid ; Danielsson, Jens and Oliveberg, Mikael LU (2020) In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117(46). p.28775-28783
Abstract

Although folded proteins are commonly depicted as simplistic combinations of β-strands and α-helices, the actual properties and functions of these secondary-structure elements in their native contexts are just partly understood. The principal reason is that the behavior of individual β- and α-elements is obscured by the global folding cooperativity. In this study, we have circumvented this problem by designing frustrated variants of the mixed α/β-protein S6, which allow the structural behavior of individual β-strands and α-helices to be targeted selectively by stopped-flow kinetics, X-ray crystallography, and solution-state NMR. Essentially, our approach is based on provoking intramolecular "domain swap." The results show that the α-... (More)

Although folded proteins are commonly depicted as simplistic combinations of β-strands and α-helices, the actual properties and functions of these secondary-structure elements in their native contexts are just partly understood. The principal reason is that the behavior of individual β- and α-elements is obscured by the global folding cooperativity. In this study, we have circumvented this problem by designing frustrated variants of the mixed α/β-protein S6, which allow the structural behavior of individual β-strands and α-helices to be targeted selectively by stopped-flow kinetics, X-ray crystallography, and solution-state NMR. Essentially, our approach is based on provoking intramolecular "domain swap." The results show that the α- and β-elements have quite different characteristics: The swaps of β-strands proceed via global unfolding, whereas the α-helices are free to swap locally in the native basin. Moreover, the α-helices tend to hybridize and to promote protein association by gliding over to neighboring molecules. This difference in structural behavior follows directly from hydrogen-bonding restrictions and suggests that the protein secondary structure defines not only tertiary geometry, but also maintains control in function and structural evolution. Finally, our alternative approach to protein folding and native-state dynamics presents a generally applicable strategy for in silico design of protein models that are computationally testable in the microsecond-millisecond regime.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
protein design, protein dynamics, secondary structure, structural cooperativity
in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
volume
117
issue
46
pages
9 pages
publisher
National Academy of Sciences
external identifiers
  • scopus:85096351159
  • pmid:33148805
ISSN
1091-6490
DOI
10.1073/pnas.1920455117
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
594dcc51-012c-482b-9b9a-78cbfc917d98
date added to LUP
2020-11-30 14:00:09
date last changed
2024-06-14 04:50:43
@article{594dcc51-012c-482b-9b9a-78cbfc917d98,
  abstract     = {{<p>Although folded proteins are commonly depicted as simplistic combinations of β-strands and α-helices, the actual properties and functions of these secondary-structure elements in their native contexts are just partly understood. The principal reason is that the behavior of individual β- and α-elements is obscured by the global folding cooperativity. In this study, we have circumvented this problem by designing frustrated variants of the mixed α/β-protein S6, which allow the structural behavior of individual β-strands and α-helices to be targeted selectively by stopped-flow kinetics, X-ray crystallography, and solution-state NMR. Essentially, our approach is based on provoking intramolecular "domain swap." The results show that the α- and β-elements have quite different characteristics: The swaps of β-strands proceed via global unfolding, whereas the α-helices are free to swap locally in the native basin. Moreover, the α-helices tend to hybridize and to promote protein association by gliding over to neighboring molecules. This difference in structural behavior follows directly from hydrogen-bonding restrictions and suggests that the protein secondary structure defines not only tertiary geometry, but also maintains control in function and structural evolution. Finally, our alternative approach to protein folding and native-state dynamics presents a generally applicable strategy for in silico design of protein models that are computationally testable in the microsecond-millisecond regime.</p>}},
  author       = {{Wang, Huabing and Logan, Derek T. and Danielsson, Jens and Oliveberg, Mikael}},
  issn         = {{1091-6490}},
  keywords     = {{protein design; protein dynamics; secondary structure; structural cooperativity}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{46}},
  pages        = {{28775--28783}},
  publisher    = {{National Academy of Sciences}},
  series       = {{Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America}},
  title        = {{Exposing the distinctive modular behavior of β-strands and α-helices in folded proteins}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920455117}},
  doi          = {{10.1073/pnas.1920455117}},
  volume       = {{117}},
  year         = {{2020}},
}