Variations of the Virome in Raw and Treated Water : A One-Year Follow-Up at Six Different Drinking Water Treatment Plants
(2025) In Environmental microbiology reports 17(6).- Abstract
Little is known about virome changes in raw and drinking water over time, and differences between raw water sources and treatment technologies. This study used metagenomics to assess viruses prevalent in raw and drinking water samples over 1 year from six Swedish drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs) with varying treatment barriers and with different raw water sources. Sequences homologous to known viruses in the raw water samples were detected by amplification and next-generation sequencing and classified into 152 different virus species belonging to 76 virus families/orders. The majority were small bacteriophages. Other viral genomes were homologous to viruses infecting plants, invertebrates, vertebrates, mammals and giant viruses... (More)
Little is known about virome changes in raw and drinking water over time, and differences between raw water sources and treatment technologies. This study used metagenomics to assess viruses prevalent in raw and drinking water samples over 1 year from six Swedish drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs) with varying treatment barriers and with different raw water sources. Sequences homologous to known viruses in the raw water samples were detected by amplification and next-generation sequencing and classified into 152 different virus species belonging to 76 virus families/orders. The majority were small bacteriophages. Other viral genomes were homologous to viruses infecting plants, invertebrates, vertebrates, mammals and giant viruses infecting amoeba or algae. Several virus species were simultaneously found in both raw and drinking water, indicating passage through the purification barriers, although reduced by 1–3 log10 after treatment. Most viruses detected in water samples after ultrafiltration were small viruses, and other barriers appeared more effective at removing smaller viruses. To avoid detecting viruses possibly replicating within DWTPs, viruses were separated according to the possibility that the host could be found in the water sources or not. These results underscore the importance of monitoring both raw and drinking water for small viruses, especially when viral contamination of the source water is at risk, to ensure drinking water quality.
(Less)
- author
- organization
- publishing date
- 2025-12
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- drinking water treatment plant, metagenomics, virome
- in
- Environmental microbiology reports
- volume
- 17
- issue
- 6
- article number
- e70222
- publisher
- John Wiley & Sons Inc.
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:105020321338
- pmid:41152000
- ISSN
- 1758-2229
- DOI
- 10.1111/1758-2229.70222
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 5be295da-1b80-4965-b7dc-9de0add0c1d7
- date added to LUP
- 2025-12-10 09:38:38
- date last changed
- 2025-12-10 09:40:08
@article{5be295da-1b80-4965-b7dc-9de0add0c1d7,
abstract = {{<p>Little is known about virome changes in raw and drinking water over time, and differences between raw water sources and treatment technologies. This study used metagenomics to assess viruses prevalent in raw and drinking water samples over 1 year from six Swedish drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs) with varying treatment barriers and with different raw water sources. Sequences homologous to known viruses in the raw water samples were detected by amplification and next-generation sequencing and classified into 152 different virus species belonging to 76 virus families/orders. The majority were small bacteriophages. Other viral genomes were homologous to viruses infecting plants, invertebrates, vertebrates, mammals and giant viruses infecting amoeba or algae. Several virus species were simultaneously found in both raw and drinking water, indicating passage through the purification barriers, although reduced by 1–3 log<sub>10</sub> after treatment. Most viruses detected in water samples after ultrafiltration were small viruses, and other barriers appeared more effective at removing smaller viruses. To avoid detecting viruses possibly replicating within DWTPs, viruses were separated according to the possibility that the host could be found in the water sources or not. These results underscore the importance of monitoring both raw and drinking water for small viruses, especially when viral contamination of the source water is at risk, to ensure drinking water quality.</p>}},
author = {{Saguti, Fredy and Wang, Hao and Churqui, Marianela Patzi and Tunovic, Timur and Holmer, Linda and Pettersson, Ämma and Schleich, Caroline and Pott, Britt Marie and Bergstedt, Olof and Nyström, Kristina and Norder, Heléne}},
issn = {{1758-2229}},
keywords = {{drinking water treatment plant; metagenomics; virome}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{6}},
publisher = {{John Wiley & Sons Inc.}},
series = {{Environmental microbiology reports}},
title = {{Variations of the Virome in Raw and Treated Water : A One-Year Follow-Up at Six Different Drinking Water Treatment Plants}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1758-2229.70222}},
doi = {{10.1111/1758-2229.70222}},
volume = {{17}},
year = {{2025}},
}
