A critical review of disproportionality in loss and damage from climate change
Dorkenoo, Kelly LU
; Scown, Murray
LU
and Boyd, Emily
LU
(2022)
In Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change
13(4).
- Abstract
- The notion of disproportionate impacts of climate change on certain groups and regions has long been a part of policy debates and scientific inquiry, and was instrumental to the emergence of the “Loss and Damage” (L&D) policy agenda in international negotiations on climate change. Yet, ‘disproportionality’ remains relatively undefined and implicit in science on loss and damage from climate change. A coherent theoretical basis of disproportionality is needed for advancing science and policy on loss and damage. It is necessary to ask: What is disproportionate, to whom, and in relation to what? We critically examine the uses of disproportionality in loss and damage scholarship by analyzing how disproportionality is treated in the... (More)
- The notion of disproportionate impacts of climate change on certain groups and regions has long been a part of policy debates and scientific inquiry, and was instrumental to the emergence of the “Loss and Damage” (L&D) policy agenda in international negotiations on climate change. Yet, ‘disproportionality’ remains relatively undefined and implicit in science on loss and damage from climate change. A coherent theoretical basis of disproportionality is needed for advancing science and policy on loss and damage. It is necessary to ask: What is disproportionate, to whom, and in relation to what? We critically examine the uses of disproportionality in loss and damage scholarship by analyzing how disproportionality is treated in the literature conceptually, methodologically, and empirically. We review publications against a set of criteria derived from seminal work on disproportionality in other fields, mainly environmental justice and disaster studies that have analyzed environment–society interactions. We find disproportionality to be dynamic and multidimensional, spanning the themes of risks, impacts, and burdens. Our results show that while the concept is often used in loss and damage scholarship, its use relies on unarticulated notions of justice and often lacks conceptual, methodological and empirical grounding. Disproportionality also appears as a boundary concept, enabling critical and multiscalar explorations of historical processes that shape the uneven impacts of climate change, alongside social justice and normative claims for desired futures. This emerging area of science offers an opportunity to critically re-evaluate the conceptualization of the relationship between climate-change-related impacts, development, and inequality. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/60bfff67-211c-4e1f-b95f-086224485f40
- author
- Dorkenoo, Kelly
LU
; Scown, Murray
LU
and Boyd, Emily
LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2022-02-23
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- climate change, climate justice, development, inequality, loss and damage
- in
- Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change
- volume
- 13
- issue
- 4
- publisher
- John Wiley & Sons Inc.
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85125045512
- ISSN
- 1757-7799
- DOI
- 10.1002/wcc.770
- project
- Recasting the disproportionate impacts of climate change extremes
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 60bfff67-211c-4e1f-b95f-086224485f40
- date added to LUP
- 2022-04-15 09:55:19
- date last changed
- 2025-04-04 14:28:30
@article{60bfff67-211c-4e1f-b95f-086224485f40,
abstract = {{The notion of disproportionate impacts of climate change on certain groups and regions has long been a part of policy debates and scientific inquiry, and was instrumental to the emergence of the “Loss and Damage” (L&D) policy agenda in international negotiations on climate change. Yet, ‘disproportionality’ remains relatively undefined and implicit in science on loss and damage from climate change. A coherent theoretical basis of disproportionality is needed for advancing science and policy on loss and damage. It is necessary to ask: What is disproportionate, to whom, and in relation to what? We critically examine the uses of disproportionality in loss and damage scholarship by analyzing how disproportionality is treated in the literature conceptually, methodologically, and empirically. We review publications against a set of criteria derived from seminal work on disproportionality in other fields, mainly environmental justice and disaster studies that have analyzed environment–society interactions. We find disproportionality to be dynamic and multidimensional, spanning the themes of risks, impacts, and burdens. Our results show that while the concept is often used in loss and damage scholarship, its use relies on unarticulated notions of justice and often lacks conceptual, methodological and empirical grounding. Disproportionality also appears as a boundary concept, enabling critical and multiscalar explorations of historical processes that shape the uneven impacts of climate change, alongside social justice and normative claims for desired futures. This emerging area of science offers an opportunity to critically re-evaluate the conceptualization of the relationship between climate-change-related impacts, development, and inequality.}},
author = {{Dorkenoo, Kelly and Scown, Murray and Boyd, Emily}},
issn = {{1757-7799}},
keywords = {{climate change; climate justice; development; inequality; loss and damage}},
language = {{eng}},
month = {{02}},
number = {{4}},
publisher = {{John Wiley & Sons Inc.}},
series = {{Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change}},
title = {{A critical review of disproportionality in loss and damage from climate change}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcc.770}},
doi = {{10.1002/wcc.770}},
volume = {{13}},
year = {{2022}},
}