Disagreement of feminine gender: historical perspectives
(2012) In Text & Talk: an interdisciplinary journal of language, discourse & communication studies 32(1). p.63-82- Abstract
- In this paper a particular case of grammatical gender agreement system is discussed, concerning the referent of young females or small children. These referents are grammatically treated as neuter nouns, disregarding their biological sex. This is termed gender disagreement. It is argued here that this is due to the older classification of nouns based on active and inactive distinction, stemming from the active alignment. What decides the distinction is the ability to reproduce, which was once a characteristic of active nouns. This criterion has not been given much attention in analyzing modern languages, but it has been very persistent in spite of various sociocultural factors that forced changes in other parts of grammar Thus, it can be... (More)
- In this paper a particular case of grammatical gender agreement system is discussed, concerning the referent of young females or small children. These referents are grammatically treated as neuter nouns, disregarding their biological sex. This is termed gender disagreement. It is argued here that this is due to the older classification of nouns based on active and inactive distinction, stemming from the active alignment. What decides the distinction is the ability to reproduce, which was once a characteristic of active nouns. This criterion has not been given much attention in analyzing modern languages, but it has been very persistent in spite of various sociocultural factors that forced changes in other parts of grammar Thus, it can be claimed that gender disagreement is a result of a shift of gender agreement criteria and persistency of a specific criterion, i.e., the ability to reproduce proves to be still an important criterion in gender agreement system in modern languages. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/538547
- author
- Toyota, Junichi LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2012
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- feminine, neuter, gender, agreement, active alignment, persistency
- in
- Text & Talk: an interdisciplinary journal of language, discourse & communication studies
- volume
- 32
- issue
- 1
- pages
- 63 - 82
- publisher
- De Gruyter
- external identifiers
-
- wos:000300742600004
- scopus:84856944394
- ISSN
- 1860-7349
- DOI
- 10.1515/text-2012-0004
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 6229b86d-6823-49c7-96b9-5d6a7a961229 (old id 538547)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 15:05:27
- date last changed
- 2023-09-03 23:26:10
@article{6229b86d-6823-49c7-96b9-5d6a7a961229,
abstract = {{In this paper a particular case of grammatical gender agreement system is discussed, concerning the referent of young females or small children. These referents are grammatically treated as neuter nouns, disregarding their biological sex. This is termed gender disagreement. It is argued here that this is due to the older classification of nouns based on active and inactive distinction, stemming from the active alignment. What decides the distinction is the ability to reproduce, which was once a characteristic of active nouns. This criterion has not been given much attention in analyzing modern languages, but it has been very persistent in spite of various sociocultural factors that forced changes in other parts of grammar Thus, it can be claimed that gender disagreement is a result of a shift of gender agreement criteria and persistency of a specific criterion, i.e., the ability to reproduce proves to be still an important criterion in gender agreement system in modern languages.}},
author = {{Toyota, Junichi}},
issn = {{1860-7349}},
keywords = {{feminine; neuter; gender; agreement; active alignment; persistency}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{1}},
pages = {{63--82}},
publisher = {{De Gruyter}},
series = {{Text & Talk: an interdisciplinary journal of language, discourse & communication studies}},
title = {{Disagreement of feminine gender: historical perspectives}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/text-2012-0004}},
doi = {{10.1515/text-2012-0004}},
volume = {{32}},
year = {{2012}},
}