The ethics of withdrawal : The case of follow-up from first-in-human clinical trials
Hug, Kristina LU
and Johansson, Mats
LU
(2017)
In Regenerative Medicine
12(1).
p.25-36
- Abstract
- This paper aims to analyze whether patients should be allowed to veto research-related use of medical data collected during routine follow-ups after their withdrawal from first-in-human clinical trials. Forms of withdrawal are identified and it is argued that the right to withdraw might be limited to some of these. The paper concludes that if veto right is denied, then: the research participant should be informed about the potential use of his/her follow-up data in case of his/her withdrawal and consent to it; follow-up should not be initiated for research purposes; compulsory use of follow-up data should imply the use of data anyway collected, requiring no additional effort from the patient; and before deciding about the veto right,... (More)
- This paper aims to analyze whether patients should be allowed to veto research-related use of medical data collected during routine follow-ups after their withdrawal from first-in-human clinical trials. Forms of withdrawal are identified and it is argued that the right to withdraw might be limited to some of these. The paper concludes that if veto right is denied, then: the research participant should be informed about the potential use of his/her follow-up data in case of his/her withdrawal and consent to it; follow-up should not be initiated for research purposes; compulsory use of follow-up data should imply the use of data anyway collected, requiring no additional effort from the patient; and before deciding about the veto right, investigation of concerned patients’ value preferences is needed. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/62afd007-b4ce-46c8-b71d-b088c2b6012a
- author
- Hug, Kristina
LU
and Johansson, Mats
LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2017
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- ethics of withdrawal
- in
- Regenerative Medicine
- volume
- 12
- issue
- 1
- pages
- 25 - 36
- publisher
- Future Medicine Ltd.
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85007344914
- pmid:27976967
- wos:000391864700005
- ISSN
- 1746-0751
- DOI
- 10.2217/rme-2016-0116
- project
- Research on decisionally incapacitated individuals. A legal study of the Act concerning the Ethical Review of Research Involving Humans, and its application
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 62afd007-b4ce-46c8-b71d-b088c2b6012a
- date added to LUP
- 2016-10-24 16:38:57
- date last changed
- 2024-01-25 13:36:35
@article{62afd007-b4ce-46c8-b71d-b088c2b6012a,
abstract = {{This paper aims to analyze whether patients should be allowed to veto research-related use of medical data collected during routine follow-ups after their withdrawal from first-in-human clinical trials. Forms of withdrawal are identified and it is argued that the right to withdraw might be limited to some of these. The paper concludes that if veto right is denied, then: the research participant should be informed about the potential use of his/her follow-up data in case of his/her withdrawal and consent to it; follow-up should not be initiated for research purposes; compulsory use of follow-up data should imply the use of data anyway collected, requiring no additional effort from the patient; and before deciding about the veto right, investigation of concerned patients’ value preferences is needed.}},
author = {{Hug, Kristina and Johansson, Mats}},
issn = {{1746-0751}},
keywords = {{ethics of withdrawal}},
language = {{eng}},
number = {{1}},
pages = {{25--36}},
publisher = {{Future Medicine Ltd.}},
series = {{Regenerative Medicine}},
title = {{The ethics of withdrawal : The case of follow-up from first-in-human clinical trials}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/rme-2016-0116}},
doi = {{10.2217/rme-2016-0116}},
volume = {{12}},
year = {{2017}},
}