Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Disinformation, Deterrence and the Politics of Attribution

Hedling, Elsa LU and Ördén, Hedvig LU orcid (2025) In International Affairs
Abstract
This article unpacks the politics of disinformation attribution as deterrence. Research and policy on disinformation deterrence commonly draw on frameworks inspired by cyber deterrence to address the ‘attribution problem’, thereby overlooking the political aspects underpinning attribution strategies in liberal democracies. Addressing this gap and bringing together disinformation studies and the fourth wave of deterrence theory, the article examines how acts of attribution serve liberal states’ attempts at deterring foreign influence operations. In liberal states, disinformation as an external threat intersects with essential processes of public deliberation and acts of attribution are charged with political risk. Introducing the... (More)
This article unpacks the politics of disinformation attribution as deterrence. Research and policy on disinformation deterrence commonly draw on frameworks inspired by cyber deterrence to address the ‘attribution problem’, thereby overlooking the political aspects underpinning attribution strategies in liberal democracies. Addressing this gap and bringing together disinformation studies and the fourth wave of deterrence theory, the article examines how acts of attribution serve liberal states’ attempts at deterring foreign influence operations. In liberal states, disinformation as an external threat intersects with essential processes of public deliberation and acts of attribution are charged with political risk. Introducing the ‘uncertainty loop’, the article demonstrates how the flow of uncertainty charges the decision-making situation in disinformation attribution. Drawing on three contemporary empirical cases - the US election interference in 2016, the German election interference in 2021 and the EU response to Covid-19 ‘infodemic’ - the article then illustrates how diverse strategies of attribution, non-attribution and diffused attribution have been employed by governments. By laying bare the politics of disinformation attribution and advancing a conceptual apparatus for understanding its variations, the article expands current knowledge on disinformation deterrence and speaks to a broader IR literature on how deterrence strategies are mediated through political contexts. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
epub
subject
in
International Affairs
publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
ISSN
0020-5850
DOI
10.1093/ia/iiaf012
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
6681ef5c-3eab-4066-8eea-ab21206662b8
date added to LUP
2024-10-11 11:55:18
date last changed
2025-04-04 15:16:26
@article{6681ef5c-3eab-4066-8eea-ab21206662b8,
  abstract     = {{This article unpacks the politics of disinformation attribution as deterrence. Research and policy on disinformation deterrence commonly draw on frameworks inspired by cyber deterrence to address the ‘attribution problem’, thereby overlooking the political aspects underpinning attribution strategies in liberal democracies. Addressing this gap and bringing together disinformation studies and the fourth wave of deterrence theory, the article examines how acts of attribution serve liberal states’ attempts at deterring foreign influence operations. In liberal states, disinformation as an external threat intersects with essential processes of public deliberation and acts of attribution are charged with political risk. Introducing the ‘uncertainty loop’, the article demonstrates how the flow of uncertainty charges the decision-making situation in disinformation attribution. Drawing on three contemporary empirical cases - the US election interference in 2016, the German election interference in 2021 and the EU response to Covid-19 ‘infodemic’ - the article then illustrates how diverse strategies of attribution, non-attribution and diffused attribution have been employed by governments. By laying bare the politics of disinformation attribution and advancing a conceptual apparatus for understanding its variations, the article expands current knowledge on disinformation deterrence and speaks to a broader IR literature on how deterrence strategies are mediated through political contexts.}},
  author       = {{Hedling, Elsa and Ördén, Hedvig}},
  issn         = {{0020-5850}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{03}},
  publisher    = {{Wiley-Blackwell}},
  series       = {{International Affairs}},
  title        = {{Disinformation, Deterrence and the Politics of Attribution}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiaf012}},
  doi          = {{10.1093/ia/iiaf012}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}