Advanced

Enabling environments? Examining social co-benefits of ecosystem-based adaptation to climate change in Sri Lanka

Woroniecki, Stephen LU (2019) In Sustainability (Switzerland) 11(3).
Abstract

Climate change vulnerability and social marginalisation are often interrelated in and through environments. Variations in climate change adaptation practice and research account for such social-ecological relations to varying degrees. Advocates of ecosystem-based approaches to climate change adaptation (EbA) claim that it delivers social co-benefits to marginalised groups, although scant empirical evidence supports such claims. I investigate these claims in two EbA interventions in Sri Lanka, interpreting social benefits through an empowerment lens. I use qualitative methods such as focus groups and narrative interviews to study the conduct and context of the interventions. In both cases, marginalised people's own empowered adaptive... (More)

Climate change vulnerability and social marginalisation are often interrelated in and through environments. Variations in climate change adaptation practice and research account for such social-ecological relations to varying degrees. Advocates of ecosystem-based approaches to climate change adaptation (EbA) claim that it delivers social co-benefits to marginalised groups, although scant empirical evidence supports such claims. I investigate these claims in two EbA interventions in Sri Lanka, interpreting social benefits through an empowerment lens. I use qualitative methods such as focus groups and narrative interviews to study the conduct and context of the interventions. In both cases, marginalised people's own empowered adaptive strategies reflect how power relations and vulnerabilities relate to dynamic ecologies. The findings show that EbA enabled social benefits for marginalised groups, especially through support to common-pool resource management institutions and the gendered practices of home gardens. Such conduct was embedded within, but mostly peripheral to, broader and deeper contestations of power. Nevertheless, projects acted as platforms for renegotiating these power relations, including through acts of resistance. The results call for greater recognition of the ways that marginalised groups relate to ecology within empowered adaptive strategies, whilst also highlighting the need to recognise the diverse interests and power relations that cut across the conduct and contexts of these nominally ecosystem-based interventions.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Co-benefits, Ecosystem-based adaptation, Nature-based solutions, Power, Social-ecological systems, Sustainability transformations
in
Sustainability (Switzerland)
volume
11
issue
3
publisher
MDPI AG
external identifiers
  • scopus:85060987633
ISSN
2071-1050
DOI
10.3390/su11030772
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
66d07e69-ffce-4102-9d90-0c8e0188002a
date added to LUP
2019-02-11 12:23:19
date last changed
2019-03-12 04:21:00
@article{66d07e69-ffce-4102-9d90-0c8e0188002a,
  abstract     = {<p>Climate change vulnerability and social marginalisation are often interrelated in and through environments. Variations in climate change adaptation practice and research account for such social-ecological relations to varying degrees. Advocates of ecosystem-based approaches to climate change adaptation (EbA) claim that it delivers social co-benefits to marginalised groups, although scant empirical evidence supports such claims. I investigate these claims in two EbA interventions in Sri Lanka, interpreting social benefits through an empowerment lens. I use qualitative methods such as focus groups and narrative interviews to study the conduct and context of the interventions. In both cases, marginalised people's own empowered adaptive strategies reflect how power relations and vulnerabilities relate to dynamic ecologies. The findings show that EbA enabled social benefits for marginalised groups, especially through support to common-pool resource management institutions and the gendered practices of home gardens. Such conduct was embedded within, but mostly peripheral to, broader and deeper contestations of power. Nevertheless, projects acted as platforms for renegotiating these power relations, including through acts of resistance. The results call for greater recognition of the ways that marginalised groups relate to ecology within empowered adaptive strategies, whilst also highlighting the need to recognise the diverse interests and power relations that cut across the conduct and contexts of these nominally ecosystem-based interventions.</p>},
  articleno    = {772},
  author       = {Woroniecki, Stephen},
  issn         = {2071-1050},
  keyword      = {Co-benefits,Ecosystem-based adaptation,Nature-based solutions,Power,Social-ecological systems,Sustainability transformations},
  language     = {eng},
  month        = {02},
  number       = {3},
  publisher    = {MDPI AG},
  series       = {Sustainability (Switzerland)},
  title        = {Enabling environments? Examining social co-benefits of ecosystem-based adaptation to climate change in Sri Lanka},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11030772},
  volume       = {11},
  year         = {2019},
}