Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Interviewees with an agenda – Learning from a 'failed' interview

Jacobsson, Katarina LU and Åkerström, Malin LU (2013) In Qualitative Research 13(6). p.717-734
Abstract
Social constructionists consider interviews as mutually co-constructing meaning. But what if the interlocutors do not seem to agree on what they construct? What if the interviewee has a particularly strong agenda, far from the intended research topic? Are these ‘failed’ interviews? We address this issue using a ‘deviant’ interview in a study of ‘being a neighbour’. First, we add to the discussion of interviewees’ category representativeness by acknowledging a situation when the interviewee insists on representing a category not intended by the researcher. Second, we address the notion of asymmetries of power, where it is often assumed that the interviewer has the upper hand. Through this case, we argue that the opposite may well be true.... (More)
Social constructionists consider interviews as mutually co-constructing meaning. But what if the interlocutors do not seem to agree on what they construct? What if the interviewee has a particularly strong agenda, far from the intended research topic? Are these ‘failed’ interviews? We address this issue using a ‘deviant’ interview in a study of ‘being a neighbour’. First, we add to the discussion of interviewees’ category representativeness by acknowledging a situation when the interviewee insists on representing a category not intended by the researcher. Second, we address the notion of asymmetries of power, where it is often assumed that the interviewer has the upper hand. Through this case, we argue that the opposite may well be true. Finally, we argue that cases where the interviewee pursues a strong agenda may suggest new research areas. After all, strong efforts of resistance may indicate deeper cultural concerns. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
asymmetries of power, category representativeness, interviewing, interviewees, failed interview, multi-ethnic neighbourhood, sociology, sociologi
in
Qualitative Research
volume
13
issue
6
pages
717 - 734
publisher
SAGE Publications
external identifiers
  • wos:000328677900006
  • scopus:84889053191
ISSN
1741-3109
DOI
10.1177/1468794112465631
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
67cb3178-7708-45c6-b992-a235dfb4d084 (old id 2426483)
date added to LUP
2016-04-01 14:36:52
date last changed
2022-03-06 20:13:36
@article{67cb3178-7708-45c6-b992-a235dfb4d084,
  abstract     = {{Social constructionists consider interviews as mutually co-constructing meaning. But what if the interlocutors do not seem to agree on what they construct? What if the interviewee has a particularly strong agenda, far from the intended research topic? Are these ‘failed’ interviews? We address this issue using a ‘deviant’ interview in a study of ‘being a neighbour’. First, we add to the discussion of interviewees’ category representativeness by acknowledging a situation when the interviewee insists on representing a category not intended by the researcher. Second, we address the notion of asymmetries of power, where it is often assumed that the interviewer has the upper hand. Through this case, we argue that the opposite may well be true. Finally, we argue that cases where the interviewee pursues a strong agenda may suggest new research areas. After all, strong efforts of resistance may indicate deeper cultural concerns.}},
  author       = {{Jacobsson, Katarina and Åkerström, Malin}},
  issn         = {{1741-3109}},
  keywords     = {{asymmetries of power; category representativeness; interviewing; interviewees; failed interview; multi-ethnic neighbourhood; sociology; sociologi}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{6}},
  pages        = {{717--734}},
  publisher    = {{SAGE Publications}},
  series       = {{Qualitative Research}},
  title        = {{Interviewees with an agenda – Learning from a 'failed' interview}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1468794112465631}},
  doi          = {{10.1177/1468794112465631}},
  volume       = {{13}},
  year         = {{2013}},
}