Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

DFA as a window into postural dynamics supporting task performance : Does choice of step size matter?

Nordbeck, Patric C LU ; Andrade, Valéria ; Silva, Paula L and Kuznetsov, Nikita A (2023) In Frontiers in Network Physiology 3.
Abstract
Introduction: Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA) has been used to investigate self-similarity in center of pressure (CoP) time series. For fractional gaussian noise (fGn) signals, the analysis returns a scaling exponent, DFA-α, whose value characterizes the temporal correlations as persistent, random, or anti- persistent. In the study of postural control, DFA has revealed two time scaling regions, one at the short-term and one at the long-term scaling regions in the diffusion plots, suggesting different types of postural dynamics. Much attention has been given to the selection of minimum and maximum scales, but the choice of spacing (step size) between the window sizes at which the fluctuation function is evaluated may also affect the... (More)
Introduction: Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA) has been used to investigate self-similarity in center of pressure (CoP) time series. For fractional gaussian noise (fGn) signals, the analysis returns a scaling exponent, DFA-α, whose value characterizes the temporal correlations as persistent, random, or anti- persistent. In the study of postural control, DFA has revealed two time scaling regions, one at the short-term and one at the long-term scaling regions in the diffusion plots, suggesting different types of postural dynamics. Much attention has been given to the selection of minimum and maximum scales, but the choice of spacing (step size) between the window sizes at which the fluctuation function is evaluated may also affect the estimates of scaling exponents. The aim of this study is twofold. First, to determine whether DFA can reveal postural adjustments supporting performance of an upper limb task under variable demands. Second, to compare evenly-spaced DFA with two different step sizes, 0.5 and 1.0 in log2 units, applied to CoP time series. Methods: We analyzed time series of anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) CoP displacement from healthy participants performing a sequential upper limb task under variable demand. Results: DFA diffusion plots revealed two scaling regions in the AP and ML CoP time series. The short-term scaling region generally showed hyper-diffusive dynamics and long-term scaling revealed mildly persistent dynamics in the ML direction and random-like dynamics in the AP direction. There was a systematic tendency for higher estimates of DFA-α and lower estimates for crossover points for the 0.5-unit step size vs. 1.0-unit size. Discussion: Results provide evidence that DFA-αcaptures task-related differences between postural adjustments in the AP and ML directions. Results also showed that DFA-αestimates and crossover points are sensitive to step size. A step size of 0.5 led to less variable DFA-α for the long-term scaling region, higher estimation for the short-term scaling region, lower estimate for crossover points, and revealed anomalous estimates at the very short range that had implications for choice of minimum window size. We, therefore, recommend the use of 0.5 step size in evenly spaced DFAs for CoP time series similar to ours. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
fractal analysis, detrended fluctuation analysis, non-linear analysis, dynamic systems, physiology, postural control
in
Frontiers in Network Physiology
volume
3
article number
1233894
publisher
Frontiers Media S. A.
external identifiers
  • scopus:85177821768
  • pmid:37609060
ISSN
2674-0109
DOI
10.3389/fnetp.2023.1233894
project
Resilience of selected and emergent task solutions
language
English
LU publication?
yes
additional info
Copyright © 2023 Nordbeck, Andrade, Silva and Kuznetsov.
id
68b14ae8-0eee-4a23-bf59-69b3a7b92bf2
date added to LUP
2023-08-30 11:12:55
date last changed
2024-04-23 08:28:02
@article{68b14ae8-0eee-4a23-bf59-69b3a7b92bf2,
  abstract     = {{Introduction: Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA) has been used to investigate self-similarity in center of pressure (CoP) time series. For fractional gaussian noise (fGn) signals, the analysis returns a scaling exponent, DFA-α, whose value characterizes the temporal correlations as persistent, random, or anti- persistent. In the study of postural control, DFA has revealed two time scaling regions, one at the short-term and one at the long-term scaling regions in the diffusion plots, suggesting different types of postural dynamics. Much attention has been given to the selection of minimum and maximum scales, but the choice of spacing (step size) between the window sizes at which the fluctuation function is evaluated may also affect the estimates of scaling exponents. The aim of this study is twofold. First, to determine whether DFA can reveal postural adjustments supporting performance of an upper limb task under variable demands. Second, to compare evenly-spaced DFA with two different step sizes, 0.5 and 1.0 in log2 units, applied to CoP time series. Methods: We analyzed time series of anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) CoP displacement from healthy participants performing a sequential upper limb task under variable demand. Results: DFA diffusion plots revealed two scaling regions in the AP and ML CoP time series. The short-term scaling region generally showed hyper-diffusive dynamics and long-term scaling revealed mildly persistent dynamics in the ML direction and random-like dynamics in the AP direction. There was a systematic tendency for higher estimates of DFA-α and lower estimates for crossover points for the 0.5-unit step size vs. 1.0-unit size. Discussion: Results provide evidence that DFA-αcaptures task-related differences between postural adjustments in the AP and ML directions. Results also showed that DFA-αestimates and crossover points are sensitive to step size. A step size of 0.5 led to less variable DFA-α for the long-term scaling region, higher estimation for the short-term scaling region, lower estimate for crossover points, and revealed anomalous estimates at the very short range that had implications for choice of minimum window size. We, therefore, recommend the use of 0.5 step size in evenly spaced DFAs for CoP time series similar to ours.}},
  author       = {{Nordbeck, Patric C and Andrade, Valéria and Silva, Paula L and Kuznetsov, Nikita A}},
  issn         = {{2674-0109}},
  keywords     = {{fractal analysis; detrended fluctuation analysis; non-linear analysis; dynamic systems; physiology; postural control}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{08}},
  publisher    = {{Frontiers Media S. A.}},
  series       = {{Frontiers in Network Physiology}},
  title        = {{DFA as a window into postural dynamics supporting task performance : Does choice of step size matter?}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnetp.2023.1233894}},
  doi          = {{10.3389/fnetp.2023.1233894}},
  volume       = {{3}},
  year         = {{2023}},
}