Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Bystander behavior in bullying situations: Empathy, moral disengagement and defender self-efficacy

Thornberg, Robert and Jungert, Tomas LU (2013) In Journal of Adolescence 36(3). p.475-483
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to investigate how basic moral sensitivity in bullying, moral disengagement in bullying and defender self-efficacy were related to different bystander behaviors in bullying. Therefore, we examined pathways that linked students’ basic moral sensitivity, moral disengagement, and defender self-efficacy to different bystander behaviors in bullying situations. Three hundred and forty-seven teenagers completed a bullying survey. Findings indicated that compared with boys, girls expressed higher basic moral sensitivity in bullying, lower defender self-efficacy and moral disengagement in bullying. Results from the SEM showed that basic moral sensitivity in bullying was negatively related to pro-bully behavior and... (More)
The aim of the present study was to investigate how basic moral sensitivity in bullying, moral disengagement in bullying and defender self-efficacy were related to different bystander behaviors in bullying. Therefore, we examined pathways that linked students’ basic moral sensitivity, moral disengagement, and defender self-efficacy to different bystander behaviors in bullying situations. Three hundred and forty-seven teenagers completed a bullying survey. Findings indicated that compared with boys, girls expressed higher basic moral sensitivity in bullying, lower defender self-efficacy and moral disengagement in bullying. Results from the SEM showed that basic moral sensitivity in bullying was negatively related to pro-bully behavior and positively related to outsider and defender behavior, mediated by moral disengagement in bullying, which in turn was positively related to pro-bully behavior and negatively related to outsider and defender behavior. What differed in the relations between outsider and defender behaviors was the

degree of defender self-efficacy. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
and
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Journal of Adolescence
volume
36
issue
3
pages
475 - 483
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • scopus:84877078709
  • pmid:23522703
ISSN
1095-9254
DOI
10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.02.003
language
English
LU publication?
no
id
68fdbad5-2a91-4762-934f-6c76442aad2e (old id 5368442)
date added to LUP
2016-04-01 11:11:16
date last changed
2022-04-12 21:06:15
@article{68fdbad5-2a91-4762-934f-6c76442aad2e,
  abstract     = {{The aim of the present study was to investigate how basic moral sensitivity in bullying, moral disengagement in bullying and defender self-efficacy were related to different bystander behaviors in bullying. Therefore, we examined pathways that linked students’ basic moral sensitivity, moral disengagement, and defender self-efficacy to different bystander behaviors in bullying situations. Three hundred and forty-seven teenagers completed a bullying survey. Findings indicated that compared with boys, girls expressed higher basic moral sensitivity in bullying, lower defender self-efficacy and moral disengagement in bullying. Results from the SEM showed that basic moral sensitivity in bullying was negatively related to pro-bully behavior and positively related to outsider and defender behavior, mediated by moral disengagement in bullying, which in turn was positively related to pro-bully behavior and negatively related to outsider and defender behavior. What differed in the relations between outsider and defender behaviors was the<br/><br>
degree of defender self-efficacy.}},
  author       = {{Thornberg, Robert and Jungert, Tomas}},
  issn         = {{1095-9254}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{3}},
  pages        = {{475--483}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  series       = {{Journal of Adolescence}},
  title        = {{Bystander behavior in bullying situations: Empathy, moral disengagement and defender self-efficacy}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.02.003}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.02.003}},
  volume       = {{36}},
  year         = {{2013}},
}