Duration of P-wave is associated with atrial fibrillation hospitalizations in patients with atrial fibrillation and paced for bradycardia
(2007) In PACE 30(8). p.961-969- Abstract
- Background: A trial fibrillation (AF) is a common problem in pacemaker patients. We conducted a prospective observational study in patients paced for bradycardia with associated paroxysmal or persistent AF, to determine whether P-wave duration may stratify patients at higher risk for AF recurrences and AF-related hospitalizations. The patients were evaluated for the prevalence, cause, and predictors of hospitalization. Methods: We studied 660 consecutive patients (50% male, 72 +/- 9 years) who received a dual-chamber pacemaker. Median value of baseline P-wave duration was equal to 100 ms (25%-75% quartile range equal to 80-120 ms). We used this cut-off to divide the patients into group A (P <= 100 ms), composed of 385 (58.3%) patients,... (More)
- Background: A trial fibrillation (AF) is a common problem in pacemaker patients. We conducted a prospective observational study in patients paced for bradycardia with associated paroxysmal or persistent AF, to determine whether P-wave duration may stratify patients at higher risk for AF recurrences and AF-related hospitalizations. The patients were evaluated for the prevalence, cause, and predictors of hospitalization. Methods: We studied 660 consecutive patients (50% male, 72 +/- 9 years) who received a dual-chamber pacemaker. Median value of baseline P-wave duration was equal to 100 ms (25%-75% quartile range equal to 80-120 ms). We used this cut-off to divide the patients into group A (P <= 100 ms), composed of 385 (58.3%) patients, and group B (P > 100 ms), composed of 275 (41.7%) patients. Results: In a median follow-up of 19 months, 173 patients were hospitalized for all causes, 130 for cardiovascular causes, and 85 for AF-related hospitalizations. Multivariate logistic analysis showed that P-wave duration > 100 ms identified patients at higher risk (OR = 1.6, 95% confidence interval (1.1-2.8), P = 0.044) for AF-related hospitalizations. Patients in group B (P > 100 ms) more frequently suffered AF-related hospitalizations (16.4% vs 10.4%, P = 0.02) and underwent more frequent cardioversions (14.5% vs 9.1%, P = 0.029) compared with group A (P < 100 ms). Conclusions: P-wave duration may define the risk of persistent AFrequiring cardioversion or AF-related hospitalization in patients with a pacemaker for bradycardia with associated paroxysmal or persistent AF. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/691395
- author
- organization
- publishing date
- 2007
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- cardioversion, P-wave, atrial tachyarrhythmia, pacing, atrial fibrillation, electrocardiogram
- in
- PACE
- volume
- 30
- issue
- 8
- pages
- 961 - 969
- publisher
- Wiley-Blackwell
- external identifiers
-
- wos:000248803700006
- scopus:34547604104
- ISSN
- 1540-8159
- DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00793.x
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 97f597d5-e7aa-425b-9208-270fe8fcb3d0 (old id 691395)
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-01 15:18:53
- date last changed
- 2022-01-28 04:43:15
@article{97f597d5-e7aa-425b-9208-270fe8fcb3d0, abstract = {{Background: A trial fibrillation (AF) is a common problem in pacemaker patients. We conducted a prospective observational study in patients paced for bradycardia with associated paroxysmal or persistent AF, to determine whether P-wave duration may stratify patients at higher risk for AF recurrences and AF-related hospitalizations. The patients were evaluated for the prevalence, cause, and predictors of hospitalization. Methods: We studied 660 consecutive patients (50% male, 72 +/- 9 years) who received a dual-chamber pacemaker. Median value of baseline P-wave duration was equal to 100 ms (25%-75% quartile range equal to 80-120 ms). We used this cut-off to divide the patients into group A (P <= 100 ms), composed of 385 (58.3%) patients, and group B (P > 100 ms), composed of 275 (41.7%) patients. Results: In a median follow-up of 19 months, 173 patients were hospitalized for all causes, 130 for cardiovascular causes, and 85 for AF-related hospitalizations. Multivariate logistic analysis showed that P-wave duration > 100 ms identified patients at higher risk (OR = 1.6, 95% confidence interval (1.1-2.8), P = 0.044) for AF-related hospitalizations. Patients in group B (P > 100 ms) more frequently suffered AF-related hospitalizations (16.4% vs 10.4%, P = 0.02) and underwent more frequent cardioversions (14.5% vs 9.1%, P = 0.029) compared with group A (P < 100 ms). Conclusions: P-wave duration may define the risk of persistent AFrequiring cardioversion or AF-related hospitalization in patients with a pacemaker for bradycardia with associated paroxysmal or persistent AF.}}, author = {{Padeletti, Luigi and Santini, Massimo and Boriani, Giuseppe and Botto, Gianluca and Ricci, Renato and Spampinato, Andrea and Vergara, Giuseppe and Rahue, Werner G. and Capucci, Alessandro and Gulizia, Michele and Pieragnoll, Paolo and Grammatco, M. S. Andrea and Platonov, Pyotr and Barold, S. Serge}}, issn = {{1540-8159}}, keywords = {{cardioversion; P-wave; atrial tachyarrhythmia; pacing; atrial fibrillation; electrocardiogram}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{8}}, pages = {{961--969}}, publisher = {{Wiley-Blackwell}}, series = {{PACE}}, title = {{Duration of P-wave is associated with atrial fibrillation hospitalizations in patients with atrial fibrillation and paced for bradycardia}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00793.x}}, doi = {{10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00793.x}}, volume = {{30}}, year = {{2007}}, }