Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment dihydro-β-terpinyl acetate, CAS Registry Number 26252-11-9

Api, A. M. ; Belsito, D. ; Botelho, D. ; Browne, D. ; Bruze, M. LU ; Burton, G. A. ; Buschmann, J. ; Dagli, M. L. ; Date, M. and Dekant, W. , et al. (2018) In Food and Chemical Toxicology 115. p.206-213
Abstract

Summary: The use of this material under current conditions is supported by existing information. The material (dihydro-β-terpinyl acetate) was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, as well as environmental safety. Data from the read across analog menthyl acetate (1α,2β,5α) (CAS # 89-48-5) show that dihydro-β- terpinyl acetate is not genotoxic nor does it have skin sensitization potential. The repeated dose, reproductive and local respiratory toxicity endpoints were completed using the TTC (Threshold of Toxicological Concern) for a Cramer Class I material (0.03, 0.03 mg/kg/day and 1.4 mg/day, respectively). The... (More)

Summary: The use of this material under current conditions is supported by existing information. The material (dihydro-β-terpinyl acetate) was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, as well as environmental safety. Data from the read across analog menthyl acetate (1α,2β,5α) (CAS # 89-48-5) show that dihydro-β- terpinyl acetate is not genotoxic nor does it have skin sensitization potential. The repeated dose, reproductive and local respiratory toxicity endpoints were completed using the TTC (Threshold of Toxicological Concern) for a Cramer Class I material (0.03, 0.03 mg/kg/day and 1.4 mg/day, respectively). The phototoxicity/photoallergenicity endpoint was completed based on UV spectra. The environmental endpoints were evaluated, dihydro-β-terpinyl acetate was found not to be PBT as per the IFRA Environmental Standards and its risk quotients, based on its current volume of use in Europe and North America (i.e., PEC/PNEC) are <1.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; and , et al. (More)
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; and (Less)
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Environmental safety, Local respiratory toxicity, Phototoxicity/photoallergencity, Repeated dose, developmental and reproductive toxicity, Skin sensitization
in
Food and Chemical Toxicology
volume
115
pages
206 - 213
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • scopus:85042139485
  • pmid:29408617
ISSN
0278-6915
DOI
10.1016/j.fct.2018.01.037
language
English
LU publication?
no
id
69d2093f-403c-435d-b107-42bf9e751b93
date added to LUP
2018-03-07 12:17:45
date last changed
2024-06-24 11:03:28
@article{69d2093f-403c-435d-b107-42bf9e751b93,
  abstract     = {{<p>Summary: The use of this material under current conditions is supported by existing information. The material (dihydro-β-terpinyl acetate) was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, as well as environmental safety. Data from the read across analog menthyl acetate (1α,2β,5α) (CAS # 89-48-5) show that dihydro-β- terpinyl acetate is not genotoxic nor does it have skin sensitization potential. The repeated dose, reproductive and local respiratory toxicity endpoints were completed using the TTC (Threshold of Toxicological Concern) for a Cramer Class I material (0.03, 0.03 mg/kg/day and 1.4 mg/day, respectively). The phototoxicity/photoallergenicity endpoint was completed based on UV spectra. The environmental endpoints were evaluated, dihydro-β-terpinyl acetate was found not to be PBT as per the IFRA Environmental Standards and its risk quotients, based on its current volume of use in Europe and North America (i.e., PEC/PNEC) are &lt;1.</p>}},
  author       = {{Api, A. M. and Belsito, D. and Botelho, D. and Browne, D. and Bruze, M. and Burton, G. A. and Buschmann, J. and Dagli, M. L. and Date, M. and Dekant, W. and Deodhar, C. and Francis, M. and Fryer, A. D. and Joshi, K. and La Cava, S. and Lapczynski, A. and Liebler, D. C. and O'Brien, D. and Parakhia, R. and Patel, A. and Penning, T. M. and Ritacco, G. and Romine, J. and Salvito, D. and Schultz, T. W. and Sipes, I. G. and Thakkar, Y. and Theophilus, E. H. and Tiethof, A. K. and Tokura, Y. and Tsang, S. and Wahler, J.}},
  issn         = {{0278-6915}},
  keywords     = {{Environmental safety; Local respiratory toxicity; Phototoxicity/photoallergencity; Repeated dose, developmental and reproductive toxicity; Skin sensitization}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{02}},
  pages        = {{206--213}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  series       = {{Food and Chemical Toxicology}},
  title        = {{RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment dihydro-β-terpinyl acetate, CAS Registry Number 26252-11-9}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2018.01.037}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.fct.2018.01.037}},
  volume       = {{115}},
  year         = {{2018}},
}