Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Simulating Quantum Instruments with Projective Measurements and Quantum Postprocessing

Khandelwal, Shishir LU and Tavakoli, Armin LU (2025) In Physical Review Letters 135(4). p.40202-40202
Abstract

Quantum instruments describe both the classical outcome and the updated state associated with a quantum measurement. We ask whether these processes can be simulated using only a natural subset of resources, namely projective measurements on the system and quantum processing of the postmeasurement states. We show that the simulability of instruments can be connected to an entanglement classification problem. This leads to a computationally efficient necessary condition for simulation of generic instruments and to a complete characterisation for qubits. We use this to address relevant quantum information tasks, namely (i) the noise tolerance of standard qubit unsharp measurements, (ii) nonprojective advantages in information-disturbance... (More)

Quantum instruments describe both the classical outcome and the updated state associated with a quantum measurement. We ask whether these processes can be simulated using only a natural subset of resources, namely projective measurements on the system and quantum processing of the postmeasurement states. We show that the simulability of instruments can be connected to an entanglement classification problem. This leads to a computationally efficient necessary condition for simulation of generic instruments and to a complete characterisation for qubits. We use this to address relevant quantum information tasks, namely (i) the noise tolerance of standard qubit unsharp measurements, (ii) nonprojective advantages in information-disturbance trade-offs, and (iii) increased sequential Bell inequality violations under projective measurements. Moreover, we consider also d-dimensional Lüders instruments that correspond to weak versions of standard basis measurements and show that for large d these can permit scalable noise advantages over projective implementations.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
in
Physical Review Letters
volume
135
issue
4
pages
1 pages
publisher
American Physical Society
external identifiers
  • scopus:105013416679
  • pmid:40794063
ISSN
1079-7114
DOI
10.1103/bhr5-g71p
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
69ed28ed-fcd5-4cc1-ab47-108cb524cee2
date added to LUP
2025-11-10 14:27:51
date last changed
2025-11-10 14:28:59
@article{69ed28ed-fcd5-4cc1-ab47-108cb524cee2,
  abstract     = {{<p>Quantum instruments describe both the classical outcome and the updated state associated with a quantum measurement. We ask whether these processes can be simulated using only a natural subset of resources, namely projective measurements on the system and quantum processing of the postmeasurement states. We show that the simulability of instruments can be connected to an entanglement classification problem. This leads to a computationally efficient necessary condition for simulation of generic instruments and to a complete characterisation for qubits. We use this to address relevant quantum information tasks, namely (i) the noise tolerance of standard qubit unsharp measurements, (ii) nonprojective advantages in information-disturbance trade-offs, and (iii) increased sequential Bell inequality violations under projective measurements. Moreover, we consider also d-dimensional Lüders instruments that correspond to weak versions of standard basis measurements and show that for large d these can permit scalable noise advantages over projective implementations.</p>}},
  author       = {{Khandelwal, Shishir and Tavakoli, Armin}},
  issn         = {{1079-7114}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  number       = {{4}},
  pages        = {{40202--40202}},
  publisher    = {{American Physical Society}},
  series       = {{Physical Review Letters}},
  title        = {{Simulating Quantum Instruments with Projective Measurements and Quantum Postprocessing}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/bhr5-g71p}},
  doi          = {{10.1103/bhr5-g71p}},
  volume       = {{135}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}