Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Cardiometabolic outcomes with dapagliflozin after myocardial infarction by baseline ejection fraction : DAPA-MI

Erlinge, David LU orcid ; James, Stefan ; Deanfield, John ; Eriksson, Niclas ; de Belder, Mark ; Alchay, Monér ; Austin, David ; Jones, Daniel A. ; Ravn-Fischer, Annica and Sederholm Lawesson, Sofia , et al. (2025) In ESC Heart Failure
Abstract

Aims: In the randomized DAPA-MI clinical trial, 10 mg of dapagliflozin once daily improved cardiometabolic outcomes versus placebo after acute myocardial infarction (MI) in patients without established diabetes or heart failure (HF). We assessed associations between baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and cardiometabolic outcomes in DAPA-MI. Methods: The primary outcome, assessed using the win ratio method, was the hierarchical composite of death, hospitalization for HF, non-fatal MI, atrial fibrillation/flutter, Type 2 diabetes, New York Heart Association classification at last visit and body weight decrease of ≥5% from baseline to last visit. For the present analysis, patients were categorized using LVEF at... (More)

Aims: In the randomized DAPA-MI clinical trial, 10 mg of dapagliflozin once daily improved cardiometabolic outcomes versus placebo after acute myocardial infarction (MI) in patients without established diabetes or heart failure (HF). We assessed associations between baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and cardiometabolic outcomes in DAPA-MI. Methods: The primary outcome, assessed using the win ratio method, was the hierarchical composite of death, hospitalization for HF, non-fatal MI, atrial fibrillation/flutter, Type 2 diabetes, New York Heart Association classification at last visit and body weight decrease of ≥5% from baseline to last visit. For the present analysis, patients were categorized using LVEF at randomization (<50% or ≥50%). Results: Of the DAPA-MI participants with available LVEF data who received ≥1 dose of study drug (n = 3751), 2913 (77.7%) had LVEF <50% and 838 (22.3%) had LVEF ≥50%. The primary hierarchical composite outcome resulted in a win ratio favouring dapagliflozin of 1.38 (95% CI: 1.21, 1.57; P < 0.001) in patients with LVEF <50% and 1.32 (1.00, 1.73; P = 0.048) in patients with LVEF ≥ 50% (P interaction = 0.76). In a sensitivity analysis excluding patients with LVEF <30%, the primary hierarchical composite outcome resulted in a win ratio favouring dapagliflozin of 1.40 (95% CI: 1.22, 1.61; P < 0.001). There were no significant interactions between baseline LVEF and any secondary outcomes. Conclusions: Regardless of baseline LVEF, dapagliflozin resulted in significant cardiometabolic benefits versus placebo, although there was no impact on the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for HF.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
@article{6bbb83aa-7351-4dbb-b203-2b7be9f4a5d2,
  abstract     = {{<p>Aims: In the randomized DAPA-MI clinical trial, 10 mg of dapagliflozin once daily improved cardiometabolic outcomes versus placebo after acute myocardial infarction (MI) in patients without established diabetes or heart failure (HF). We assessed associations between baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and cardiometabolic outcomes in DAPA-MI. Methods: The primary outcome, assessed using the win ratio method, was the hierarchical composite of death, hospitalization for HF, non-fatal MI, atrial fibrillation/flutter, Type 2 diabetes, New York Heart Association classification at last visit and body weight decrease of ≥5% from baseline to last visit. For the present analysis, patients were categorized using LVEF at randomization (&lt;50% or ≥50%). Results: Of the DAPA-MI participants with available LVEF data who received ≥1 dose of study drug (n = 3751), 2913 (77.7%) had LVEF &lt;50% and 838 (22.3%) had LVEF ≥50%. The primary hierarchical composite outcome resulted in a win ratio favouring dapagliflozin of 1.38 (95% CI: 1.21, 1.57; P &lt; 0.001) in patients with LVEF &lt;50% and 1.32 (1.00, 1.73; P = 0.048) in patients with LVEF ≥ 50% (P interaction = 0.76). In a sensitivity analysis excluding patients with LVEF &lt;30%, the primary hierarchical composite outcome resulted in a win ratio favouring dapagliflozin of 1.40 (95% CI: 1.22, 1.61; P &lt; 0.001). There were no significant interactions between baseline LVEF and any secondary outcomes. Conclusions: Regardless of baseline LVEF, dapagliflozin resulted in significant cardiometabolic benefits versus placebo, although there was no impact on the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for HF.</p>}},
  author       = {{Erlinge, David and James, Stefan and Deanfield, John and Eriksson, Niclas and de Belder, Mark and Alchay, Monér and Austin, David and Jones, Daniel A. and Ravn-Fischer, Annica and Sederholm Lawesson, Sofia and Shah, Nikunj and Strange, Julian W. and Szummer, Karolina and Ridderstråle, Wilhelm and Parvaresh Rizi, Ehsan and Langkilde, Anna Maria and Johansson, Peter A. and McGuire, Darren K. and Oldgren, Jonas and Storey, Robert F.}},
  issn         = {{2055-5822}},
  keywords     = {{dapagliflozin; heart failure; left ventricular ejection fraction; myocardial infarction; sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  publisher    = {{John Wiley & Sons Inc.}},
  series       = {{ESC Heart Failure}},
  title        = {{Cardiometabolic outcomes with dapagliflozin after myocardial infarction by baseline ejection fraction : DAPA-MI}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.15420}},
  doi          = {{10.1002/ehf2.15420}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}