Advanced

Microsieving in municipal wastewater treatment : Chemically enhanced primary and tertiary treatment

Väänänen, Janne LU (2017)
Abstract (Swedish)
Municipal wastewater treatment plants are constantly forced to make improvements. The main objectives are to reduce energy
consumption, to increase the treatment capacity and to improve the effluent water quality. Microsieves in combination with chemical
pretreatment can potentially fulfil these objectives. In this work, experiments were mainly conducted at the large pilot scale, and
supplementary experiments were conducted at the laboratory scale to establish criteria for chemically enhanced primary and tertiary
treatment and microsieving. Full-scale follow-up experiments were also conducted at the first treatment plant in Scandinavia, utilizing
coagulation/flocculation and disc filtration in advanced tertiary... (More)
Municipal wastewater treatment plants are constantly forced to make improvements. The main objectives are to reduce energy
consumption, to increase the treatment capacity and to improve the effluent water quality. Microsieves in combination with chemical
pretreatment can potentially fulfil these objectives. In this work, experiments were mainly conducted at the large pilot scale, and
supplementary experiments were conducted at the laboratory scale to establish criteria for chemically enhanced primary and tertiary
treatment and microsieving. Full-scale follow-up experiments were also conducted at the first treatment plant in Scandinavia, utilizing
coagulation/flocculation and disc filtration in advanced tertiary treatment. Microsieves constructed as disc or drum filters showed
removal efficiencies for primary treatment in the range of 30-60% with sieve pore sizes of 30-100 μm without chemical pretreatment.
By dosing with cationic polymers, a suspended solids removal > 80% was possible, and the effluent water quality generally contained
approximately 20-50 mg SS/L; in addition, most of the particulate phosphorus and COD was also reduced. To further improve the
removal to > 95%, dosing of the coagulant is necessary; then, effluent containing < 10 mg SS/L and 0.1-0.2 mg TP/L with mostly
dissolved COD remaining was produced. Sieve pore sizes in the range of 30-100 μm had a minor influence on the removal with
chemical pretreatment; however, the solids loading capacity differed. For chemically enhanced primary treatment and microsieving,
common feedback PI automation with occasional support from the feed forward control can be used together with online turbidity
measurements to control the removal of COD. A consistent effluent COD concentration could be maintained independent of the
influent COD or flow variations. Phosphorus removal could be controlled by adjusting the coagulant dose in relation to the polymer
dose. Pretreatment with chemically enhanced primary treatment and microsieving was also beneficial for the microfiltration of
primary wastewater treatment. The effluent water quality from microfiltration was improved if pretreatment with polymer and
coagulant prior to microsieving was conducted. Anionic polymers were the most applicable because they generated a high flux.
During tertiary treatment, for the highest possible removal, a sieve with a pore size of 10 μm was needed. It is possible to consistently
achieve < 0.1 mg/L for the effluent phosphorus concentration, but careful design of the dispersion/coagulation and flocculation stages
is important, and control of the operation is necessary. Polymer addition is crucial for chemically enhanced treatment and
microsieving. Polyacrylamide based synthetic anionic or cationic polymers with a high molecular weight and low-medium charge
were shown to be suitable for both primary and tertiary treatment. A general polymer dose of 1-5 and 0.5-1.5 mg polymer/L can be
expected for primary and tertiary treatment, respectively. Alternative starch based biopolymers were also applicable, but the required
dose was higher. Both iron and aluminium coagulants were applicable, but aluminium based coagulants were shown to be an overall a
better choice. During primary treatment, the coagulant dose was variable, depending on the demand. During tertiary treatment, a
molar ratio of 5-7 mol Me3+/mol influent TP was sufficient to fulfil the effluent criteria. This corresponded to a dosing of
approximately 1-4 mg Al3+/L for the ordinary secondary effluents. Screening of chemicals and doses was performed in the laboratory
with modified jar tests. Comparable treatment results were achieved in the laboratory, at the pilot scale and at the full scale; however,
the laboratory experiments overestimated the solids loading capacity. (Less)
Abstract
Municipal wastewater treatment plants are constantly forced to make improvements. The main objectives are to reduce energy consumption, to increase the treatment capacity and to improve the effluent water quality. Microsieves in combination with chemical pretreatment can potentially fulfil these objectives. In this work, experiments were mainly conducted at the large pilot scale, and supplementary experiments were conducted at the laboratory scale to establish criteria for chemically enhanced primary and tertiary treatment and microsieving. Full-scale follow-up experiments were also conducted at the first treatment plant in Scandinavia, utilizing coagulation/flocculation and disc filtration in advanced tertiary treatment. Microsieves... (More)
Municipal wastewater treatment plants are constantly forced to make improvements. The main objectives are to reduce energy consumption, to increase the treatment capacity and to improve the effluent water quality. Microsieves in combination with chemical pretreatment can potentially fulfil these objectives. In this work, experiments were mainly conducted at the large pilot scale, and supplementary experiments were conducted at the laboratory scale to establish criteria for chemically enhanced primary and tertiary treatment and microsieving. Full-scale follow-up experiments were also conducted at the first treatment plant in Scandinavia, utilizing coagulation/flocculation and disc filtration in advanced tertiary treatment. Microsieves constructed as disc or drum filters showed removal efficiencies for primary treatment in the range of 30-60% with sieve pore sizes of 30-100 µm without chemical pretreatment. By dosing with cationic polymers, a suspended solids removal > 80% was possible, and the effluent water quality generally contained approximately 20-50 mg SS/L; in addition, most of the particulate phosphorus and COD was also reduced. To further improve the removal to > 95%, dosing of the coagulant is necessary; then, effluent containing < 10 mg SS/L and 0.1-0.2 mg TP/L with mostly dissolved COD remaining was produced. Sieve pore sizes in the range of 30-100 µm had a minor influence on the removal with chemical pretreatment; however, the solids loading capacity differed. For chemically enhanced primary treatment and microsieving, common feedback PI automation with occasional support from the feed forward control can be used together with online turbidity measurements to control the removal of COD. A consistent effluent COD concentration could be maintained independent of the influent COD or flow variations. Phosphorus removal could be controlled by adjusting the coagulant dose in relation to the polymer dose. Pretreatment with chemically enhanced primary treatment and microsieving was also beneficial for the microfiltration of primary wastewater treatment. The effluent water quality from microfiltration was improved if pretreatment with polymer and coagulant prior to microsieving was conducted. Anionic polymers were the most applicable because they generated a high flux. During tertiary treatment, for the highest possible removal, a sieve with a pore size of 10 µm was needed. It is possible to consistently achieve < 0.1 mg/L for the effluent phosphorus concentration, but careful design of the dispersion/coagulation and flocculation stages is important, and control of the operation is necessary. Polymer addition is crucial for chemically enhanced treatment and microsieving. Polyacrylamide based synthetic anionic or cationic polymers with a high molecular weight and low-medium charge were shown to be suitable for both primary and tertiary treatment. A general polymer dose of 1-5 and 0.5-1.5 mg polymer/L can be expected for primary and tertiary treatment, respectively. Alternative starch based biopolymers were also applicable, but the required dose was higher. Both iron and aluminium coagulants were applicable, but aluminium based coagulants were shown to be an overall a better choice. During primary treatment, the coagulant dose was variable, depending on the demand. During tertiary treatment, a molar ratio of 5-7 mol Me3+/mol influent TP was sufficient to fulfil the effluent criteria. This corresponded to a dosing of approximately 1-4 mg Al3+/L for the ordinary secondary effluents. Screening of chemicals and doses was performed in the laboratory with modified jar tests. Comparable treatment results were achieved in the laboratory, at the pilot scale and at the full scale; however, the laboratory experiments overestimated the solids loading capacity. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
supervisor
opponent
  • Dr van Nieuwenhuijzen, Arjen, Witteveen+Bos Consulting Engineers, Deventer, the Netherlands
organization
publishing date
type
Thesis
publication status
published
subject
keywords
coagulation, wastewater treatment, flocculation, microsieving, control, primary treatment, tertiary treatment, coagulation , control , flocculation , microsieving , municipal wastewater treatment, primary treatment , tertiary treatment
pages
78 pages
publisher
Department of Chemical Engineering, Lund University
defense location
Lecture hall K:C at Kemicentrum, Getingevägen 60, Lund University, Faculty of Engineering, Lund
defense date
2017-03-10 09:15
ISBN
978-91-7422-501-3
978-91-7422-500-6
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
71177bdd-ad89-45a8-99eb-e1bf6518ec4a
date added to LUP
2017-02-02 14:09:26
date last changed
2017-02-16 10:05:35
@phdthesis{71177bdd-ad89-45a8-99eb-e1bf6518ec4a,
  abstract     = {Municipal wastewater treatment plants are constantly forced to make improvements. The main objectives are to reduce energy consumption, to increase the treatment capacity and to improve the effluent water quality. Microsieves in combination with chemical pretreatment can potentially fulfil these objectives. In this work, experiments were mainly conducted at the large pilot scale, and supplementary experiments were conducted at the laboratory scale to establish criteria for chemically enhanced primary and tertiary treatment and microsieving. Full-scale follow-up experiments were also conducted at the first treatment plant in Scandinavia, utilizing coagulation/flocculation and disc filtration in advanced tertiary treatment. Microsieves constructed as disc or drum filters showed removal efficiencies for primary treatment in the range of 30-60% with sieve pore sizes of 30-100 µm without chemical pretreatment. By dosing with cationic polymers, a suspended solids removal &gt; 80% was possible, and the effluent water quality generally contained approximately 20-50 mg SS/L; in addition, most of the particulate phosphorus and COD was also reduced. To further improve the removal to &gt; 95%, dosing of the coagulant is necessary; then, effluent containing &lt; 10 mg SS/L and 0.1-0.2 mg TP/L with mostly dissolved COD remaining was produced. Sieve pore sizes in the range of 30-100 µm had a minor influence on the removal with chemical pretreatment; however, the solids loading capacity differed. For chemically enhanced primary treatment and microsieving, common feedback PI automation with occasional support from the feed forward control can be used together with online turbidity measurements to control the removal of COD. A consistent effluent COD concentration could be maintained independent of the influent COD or flow variations. Phosphorus removal could be controlled by adjusting the coagulant dose in relation to the polymer dose. Pretreatment with chemically enhanced primary treatment and microsieving was also beneficial for the microfiltration of primary wastewater treatment. The effluent water quality from microfiltration was improved if pretreatment with polymer and coagulant prior to microsieving was conducted. Anionic polymers were the most applicable because they generated a high flux. During tertiary treatment, for the highest possible removal, a sieve with a pore size of 10 µm was needed. It is possible to consistently achieve &lt; 0.1 mg/L for the effluent phosphorus concentration, but careful design of the dispersion/coagulation and flocculation stages is important, and control of the operation is necessary. Polymer addition is crucial for chemically enhanced treatment and microsieving. Polyacrylamide based synthetic anionic or cationic polymers with a high molecular weight and low-medium charge were shown to be suitable for both primary and tertiary treatment. A general polymer dose of 1-5 and 0.5-1.5 mg polymer/L can be expected for primary and tertiary treatment, respectively. Alternative starch based biopolymers were also applicable, but the required dose was higher. Both iron and aluminium coagulants were applicable, but aluminium based coagulants were shown to be an overall a better choice. During primary treatment, the coagulant dose was variable, depending on the demand. During tertiary treatment, a molar ratio of 5-7 mol Me3+/mol influent TP was sufficient to fulfil the effluent criteria. This corresponded to a dosing of approximately 1-4 mg Al3+/L for the ordinary secondary effluents. Screening of chemicals and doses was performed in the laboratory with modified jar tests. Comparable treatment results were achieved in the laboratory, at the pilot scale and at the full scale; however, the laboratory experiments overestimated the solids loading capacity.},
  author       = {Väänänen, Janne},
  isbn         = {978-91-7422-501-3},
  keyword      = {coagulation,wastewater treatment,flocculation,microsieving,control,primary treatment,tertiary treatment,coagulation ,control ,flocculation ,microsieving ,municipal wastewater treatment, primary treatment ,tertiary treatment},
  language     = {eng},
  month        = {02},
  pages        = {78},
  publisher    = {Department of Chemical Engineering, Lund University},
  school       = {Lund University},
  title        = {Microsieving in municipal wastewater treatment : Chemically enhanced primary and tertiary treatment},
  year         = {2017},
}