Advanced

Att forska om effekter av erfarenhetsbaserat lärande – några villkor för utvärdering av grupprelationskonferenser

Jern, Stefan LU (2002) In Nordisk Psykologi: Teori, Forskning, Praksis 54. p.233-248
Abstract
This paper outlines possible strategies for evaluation of group relations conferences. Based on comparison of group relations and sensitivity training, the evaluations made of the latter are critically reviewed. Restriction to outcomes, means, variability measures, experimental paradigms and effect-without-process studies, instrumental views on learning and less developed conceptions of groups hampered research. Recommendations: evaluators should a. Take into account narratives from participants and staffs, b. Respect developments in group research, c. Combine process and effect approaches, d. Start out from non-modern learning views, e. Accept participatory, interactive and action research. Ideological barriers between staffs and... (More)
This paper outlines possible strategies for evaluation of group relations conferences. Based on comparison of group relations and sensitivity training, the evaluations made of the latter are critically reviewed. Restriction to outcomes, means, variability measures, experimental paradigms and effect-without-process studies, instrumental views on learning and less developed conceptions of groups hampered research. Recommendations: evaluators should a. Take into account narratives from participants and staffs, b. Respect developments in group research, c. Combine process and effect approaches, d. Start out from non-modern learning views, e. Accept participatory, interactive and action research. Ideological barriers between staffs and researchers have to be overcome. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
Tavistock, evaluation, sensitivity training, outcome research, group relations, narratives
in
Nordisk Psykologi: Teori, Forskning, Praksis
volume
54
pages
233 - 248
publisher
Dansk Psykologisk Forlag
external identifiers
  • wos:000179461900005
ISSN
0029-1463
language
Swedish
LU publication?
yes
id
2d96dc49-6ee1-4187-a2c2-dcf5eedb176d (old id 714634)
date added to LUP
2007-12-21 14:03:48
date last changed
2016-04-16 06:20:46
@article{2d96dc49-6ee1-4187-a2c2-dcf5eedb176d,
  abstract     = {This paper outlines possible strategies for evaluation of group relations conferences. Based on comparison of group relations and sensitivity training, the evaluations made of the latter are critically reviewed. Restriction to outcomes, means, variability measures, experimental paradigms and effect-without-process studies, instrumental views on learning and less developed conceptions of groups hampered research. Recommendations: evaluators should a. Take into account narratives from participants and staffs, b. Respect developments in group research, c. Combine process and effect approaches, d. Start out from non-modern learning views, e. Accept participatory, interactive and action research. Ideological barriers between staffs and researchers have to be overcome.},
  author       = {Jern, Stefan},
  issn         = {0029-1463},
  keyword      = {Tavistock,evaluation,sensitivity training,outcome research,group relations,narratives},
  language     = {swe},
  pages        = {233--248},
  publisher    = {Dansk Psykologisk Forlag},
  series       = {Nordisk Psykologi: Teori, Forskning, Praksis},
  title        = {Att forska om effekter av erfarenhetsbaserat lärande – några villkor för utvärdering av grupprelationskonferenser},
  volume       = {54},
  year         = {2002},
}