Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

The impact of common PCR inhibitors on forensic MPS analysis

Sidstedt, Maja LU ; Steffen, Carolyn R. ; Kiesler, Kevin M. ; Vallone, Peter M. ; Rådström, Peter LU and Hedman, Johannes LU (2019) In Forensic Science International: Genetics 40. p.182-191
Abstract

Massively parallel sequencing holds great promise for new possibilities in the field of forensic genetics, enabling simultaneous analysis of multiple markers as well as offering enhanced short tandem repeat allele resolution. A challenge in forensic DNA analysis is that the samples often contain low amounts of DNA in a background that may interfere with downstream analysis. PCR inhibition mechanisms of some relevant molecules have been studied applying e.g. real-time PCR and digital PCR. However, a detailed understanding of the effects of inhibitory molecules on forensic MPS, including mechanisms and ways to relieve inhibition, is missing. In this study, the effects of two well-characterized PCR inhibitors, humic acid and hematin, have... (More)

Massively parallel sequencing holds great promise for new possibilities in the field of forensic genetics, enabling simultaneous analysis of multiple markers as well as offering enhanced short tandem repeat allele resolution. A challenge in forensic DNA analysis is that the samples often contain low amounts of DNA in a background that may interfere with downstream analysis. PCR inhibition mechanisms of some relevant molecules have been studied applying e.g. real-time PCR and digital PCR. However, a detailed understanding of the effects of inhibitory molecules on forensic MPS, including mechanisms and ways to relieve inhibition, is missing. In this study, the effects of two well-characterized PCR inhibitors, humic acid and hematin, have been studied using the ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep kit. Humic acid and hematin resulted in lowered read numbers as well as specific negative effects on certain markers. Quality control of libraries with Fragment analyzer showed that increasing amounts of inhibitors caused a lowered amplicon quantity and that the larger amplicons were more likely to drop out. Further, the inhibitor tolerance could be improved 5–10 times by addition of bovine serum albumin in the initial PCR. On the contrary to the samples with inhibitors, low-template samples resulted in lowered read numbers for all markers. This difference strengthened the conclusion that the inhibitors have a negative effect on the DNA polymerase activity in the initial PCR. Additionally, a common capillary gel electrophoresis-based STR kit was shown to handle at least 200 times more inhibitors than the ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep kit. This suggests that there is room for improvement of the PCR components to ensure analytical success for challenging samples, which is needed for a broad application of MPS for forensic STR analysis.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
ForenSeq DNA signature prep kit, Hematin, Humic acid, Massively parallel sequencing, MiSeq FGx, PCR inhibitors, Short tandem repeats
in
Forensic Science International: Genetics
volume
40
pages
10 pages
publisher
Elsevier
external identifiers
  • pmid:30878722
  • scopus:85062803268
ISSN
1872-4973
DOI
10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.03.001
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
734606e6-fcbb-4e17-9d0a-e3e0bc7529de
date added to LUP
2019-03-19 09:45:14
date last changed
2024-06-25 08:44:37
@article{734606e6-fcbb-4e17-9d0a-e3e0bc7529de,
  abstract     = {{<p>Massively parallel sequencing holds great promise for new possibilities in the field of forensic genetics, enabling simultaneous analysis of multiple markers as well as offering enhanced short tandem repeat allele resolution. A challenge in forensic DNA analysis is that the samples often contain low amounts of DNA in a background that may interfere with downstream analysis. PCR inhibition mechanisms of some relevant molecules have been studied applying e.g. real-time PCR and digital PCR. However, a detailed understanding of the effects of inhibitory molecules on forensic MPS, including mechanisms and ways to relieve inhibition, is missing. In this study, the effects of two well-characterized PCR inhibitors, humic acid and hematin, have been studied using the ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep kit. Humic acid and hematin resulted in lowered read numbers as well as specific negative effects on certain markers. Quality control of libraries with Fragment analyzer showed that increasing amounts of inhibitors caused a lowered amplicon quantity and that the larger amplicons were more likely to drop out. Further, the inhibitor tolerance could be improved 5–10 times by addition of bovine serum albumin in the initial PCR. On the contrary to the samples with inhibitors, low-template samples resulted in lowered read numbers for all markers. This difference strengthened the conclusion that the inhibitors have a negative effect on the DNA polymerase activity in the initial PCR. Additionally, a common capillary gel electrophoresis-based STR kit was shown to handle at least 200 times more inhibitors than the ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep kit. This suggests that there is room for improvement of the PCR components to ensure analytical success for challenging samples, which is needed for a broad application of MPS for forensic STR analysis.</p>}},
  author       = {{Sidstedt, Maja and Steffen, Carolyn R. and Kiesler, Kevin M. and Vallone, Peter M. and Rådström, Peter and Hedman, Johannes}},
  issn         = {{1872-4973}},
  keywords     = {{ForenSeq DNA signature prep kit; Hematin; Humic acid; Massively parallel sequencing; MiSeq FGx; PCR inhibitors; Short tandem repeats}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  pages        = {{182--191}},
  publisher    = {{Elsevier}},
  series       = {{Forensic Science International: Genetics}},
  title        = {{The impact of common PCR inhibitors on forensic MPS analysis}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.03.001}},
  doi          = {{10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.03.001}},
  volume       = {{40}},
  year         = {{2019}},
}