Test-retest reliability of the life satisfaction questionnaire (LISAT-11) and association between items in individuals with chronic stroke
(2018) In Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 50(8). p.713-718- Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the test–retest reliability of the Life Satisfaction Questionnaire (LiSat-11) and the association between items in individuals with chronic stroke. Design: Test–retest design. Subjects: Forty-five individuals (mean age 65 years) with mild to moderate disability at least 6 months post-stroke. Methods: LiSat-11, which includes 1 global item”Life as a whole” and 10 domain-specific items, was rated on 2 occasions, one week apart. Test–retest reliability was evaluated by kappa statistics, the percent agreement (PA) and the Svensson rank-invariant method. The association between items was evaluated with the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (rho). Results: The kappa coefficients showed good to excellent agreement... (More)
Objective: To evaluate the test–retest reliability of the Life Satisfaction Questionnaire (LiSat-11) and the association between items in individuals with chronic stroke. Design: Test–retest design. Subjects: Forty-five individuals (mean age 65 years) with mild to moderate disability at least 6 months post-stroke. Methods: LiSat-11, which includes 1 global item”Life as a whole” and 10 domain-specific items, was rated on 2 occasions, one week apart. Test–retest reliability was evaluated by kappa statistics, the percent agreement (PA) and the Svensson rank-invariant method. The association between items was evaluated with the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (rho). Results: The kappa coefficients showed good to excellent agreement (0.59–0.97) and the PA ≤ 1 point was high (> 89%) for all items. According to the Svensson method, a small systematic disagreement was found for “Partner relationship”. The other items showed no systematic or random disagreements. All domain-specific items, except one (“Sexual life”) were significantly correlated with “Life as a whole” (rhos 0.29–0.80). Conclusion: LiSat-11 is considered reliable and can be recommended for assessing life satisfaction after stroke. The association between items indicates that LiSat-11 measures various aspects that can impact on an individual’s life satisfaction.
(Less)
- author
- Ekstrand, Elisabeth LU ; Lexell, Jan LU and Brogårdh, Christina LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2018
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Outcome assessment, Psychometrics, Quality of life, Rehabilitation, Reproducibility of results, Self-report, Stroke
- in
- Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
- volume
- 50
- issue
- 8
- pages
- 6 pages
- publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85051859503
- pmid:30080236
- ISSN
- 1650-1977
- DOI
- 10.2340/16501977-2362
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 7370d63d-1af9-4416-bd86-baa9215e0a31
- date added to LUP
- 2018-09-12 13:09:00
- date last changed
- 2024-11-13 10:01:00
@article{7370d63d-1af9-4416-bd86-baa9215e0a31, abstract = {{<p>Objective: To evaluate the test–retest reliability of the Life Satisfaction Questionnaire (LiSat-11) and the association between items in individuals with chronic stroke. Design: Test–retest design. Subjects: Forty-five individuals (mean age 65 years) with mild to moderate disability at least 6 months post-stroke. Methods: LiSat-11, which includes 1 global item”Life as a whole” and 10 domain-specific items, was rated on 2 occasions, one week apart. Test–retest reliability was evaluated by kappa statistics, the percent agreement (PA) and the Svensson rank-invariant method. The association between items was evaluated with the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (rho). Results: The kappa coefficients showed good to excellent agreement (0.59–0.97) and the PA ≤ 1 point was high (> 89%) for all items. According to the Svensson method, a small systematic disagreement was found for “Partner relationship”. The other items showed no systematic or random disagreements. All domain-specific items, except one (“Sexual life”) were significantly correlated with “Life as a whole” (rhos 0.29–0.80). Conclusion: LiSat-11 is considered reliable and can be recommended for assessing life satisfaction after stroke. The association between items indicates that LiSat-11 measures various aspects that can impact on an individual’s life satisfaction.</p>}}, author = {{Ekstrand, Elisabeth and Lexell, Jan and Brogårdh, Christina}}, issn = {{1650-1977}}, keywords = {{Outcome assessment; Psychometrics; Quality of life; Rehabilitation; Reproducibility of results; Self-report; Stroke}}, language = {{eng}}, number = {{8}}, pages = {{713--718}}, publisher = {{Taylor & Francis}}, series = {{Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine}}, title = {{Test-retest reliability of the life satisfaction questionnaire (LISAT-11) and association between items in individuals with chronic stroke}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2362}}, doi = {{10.2340/16501977-2362}}, volume = {{50}}, year = {{2018}}, }