Heckscher on the Slow Monetization of Sweden and His Incidental Refutation of Jevons and Menger
(2015) In Working Paper / Department of Economics, School of Economics and Management, Lund University- Abstract
- Eli F. Heckscher found that in 16'th century Sweden: 1) indirect barter was the most common exchange method and 2) monetary exchange was carried out with different coins, none a generally accepted medium of exchange. These findings refute models of the emergence of money, which builds on Jevons and Menger. Heckscher and later Wesley C. Mitchell thought the historical evolution of the exchange system would be a central theme and organizing principle for economic history, which has not happened. I discuss how the ideas of Heckscher may be combined with modern monetary theory to explain gradual monetization.
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/7761076
- author
- Fregert, Klas LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2015
- type
- Working paper/Preprint
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- double coincidence of wants, monetary exchange, indirect barter, microfoundations of money, Sweden, monetization
- in
- Working Paper / Department of Economics, School of Economics and Management, Lund University
- issue
- 23
- pages
- 17 pages
- publisher
- Department of Economics, Lund University
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 721b4397-1f94-4960-bc72-eedc41a4adab (old id 7761076)
- alternative location
- http://swopec.hhs.se/lunewp/abs/lunewp2015_023.htm
- date added to LUP
- 2016-04-04 10:44:46
- date last changed
- 2018-11-21 21:00:33
@misc{721b4397-1f94-4960-bc72-eedc41a4adab, abstract = {{Eli F. Heckscher found that in 16'th century Sweden: 1) indirect barter was the most common exchange method and 2) monetary exchange was carried out with different coins, none a generally accepted medium of exchange. These findings refute models of the emergence of money, which builds on Jevons and Menger. Heckscher and later Wesley C. Mitchell thought the historical evolution of the exchange system would be a central theme and organizing principle for economic history, which has not happened. I discuss how the ideas of Heckscher may be combined with modern monetary theory to explain gradual monetization.}}, author = {{Fregert, Klas}}, keywords = {{double coincidence of wants; monetary exchange; indirect barter; microfoundations of money; Sweden; monetization}}, language = {{eng}}, note = {{Working Paper}}, number = {{23}}, publisher = {{Department of Economics, Lund University}}, series = {{Working Paper / Department of Economics, School of Economics and Management, Lund University}}, title = {{Heckscher on the Slow Monetization of Sweden and His Incidental Refutation of Jevons and Menger}}, url = {{http://swopec.hhs.se/lunewp/abs/lunewp2015_023.htm}}, year = {{2015}}, }