Skip to main content

Lund University Publications

LUND UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES

Measurement report : Eight years of greenhouse gas fluxes at Saclay, France, estimated with the Radon Tracer Method

Yver-Kwok, Camille ; Ramonet, Michel ; Rivier, Leonard ; Lian, Jinghui ; Grossi, Claudia ; Curcoll, Roger ; Kikaj, Dafina ; Chung, Edward and Karstens, Ute LU orcid (2025) In Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 25(22). p.16085-16106
Abstract

Here, we use carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrous oxide (N2O) and radon (222Rn) data from the Saclay ICOS tall tower in France to estimate CO2, CH4 and CO fluxes within the station footprint from January 2017 to October 2024 and N2O fluxes from February 2019 to October 2024 using the Radon Tracer Method (RTM). We first performed a sensitivity study of this method applied to CH4 and combined with different radon exhalation maps including the improved European process-based radon flux maps developed within 19ENV01 traceRadon and back-trajectories in order to optimize it. Then, radon exhalation maps from the 19ENV01 traceRadon... (More)

Here, we use carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrous oxide (N2O) and radon (222Rn) data from the Saclay ICOS tall tower in France to estimate CO2, CH4 and CO fluxes within the station footprint from January 2017 to October 2024 and N2O fluxes from February 2019 to October 2024 using the Radon Tracer Method (RTM). We first performed a sensitivity study of this method applied to CH4 and combined with different radon exhalation maps including the improved European process-based radon flux maps developed within 19ENV01 traceRadon and back-trajectories in order to optimize it. Then, radon exhalation maps from the 19ENV01 traceRadon project, STILT trajectories from the ICOS Carbon Portal, best estimate of radon activity concentration and greenhouse data have been used to estimate the surface emissions. To our knowledge, this is the first study in Europe using the latest radon exhalation maps and standardized radon measurements to estimate CO2, CH4, CO and N2O surface emissions. We found that the average RTM estimates are 867 ± 565, 1.10 ± 0.89, 1.01 ± 1.05 and 0.094 ± 0.118 mgm-2h-1 for CO2, CH4, CO and N2O, respectively. These fluxes are in good agreement with the literature for the same site or for similar suburban sites in Europe. No significant trends are observed over time, except for CO, which shows a small decreasing trend especially over the last three years. CH4, N2O and CO are also in fair agreement with the inventories, though with higher values. CO2 fluxes are about 5 times higher than modeled anthropogenic and biogenic fluxes combined. The differences mainly occur during summer, and the CO/CO2 ratio points toward a misrepresentation of the biogenic fluxes by the WRF-VPRM version used here.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
; ; ; ; ; ; ; and
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
published
subject
keywords
radon, CO2, CH4, N2O
in
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
volume
25
issue
22
pages
22 pages
publisher
Copernicus GmbH
external identifiers
  • scopus:105022621489
ISSN
1680-7316
DOI
10.5194/acp-25-16085-2025
language
English
LU publication?
yes
additional info
Publisher Copyright: Copyright © 2025 Camille Yver-Kwok et al.
id
790d4dd3-f726-4e97-9028-ebef50ed5d20
date added to LUP
2025-12-02 13:24:31
date last changed
2025-12-02 16:38:28
@article{790d4dd3-f726-4e97-9028-ebef50ed5d20,
  abstract     = {{<p>Here, we use carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), methane (CH<sub>4</sub>), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) and radon (222Rn) data from the Saclay ICOS tall tower in France to estimate CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub> and CO fluxes within the station footprint from January 2017 to October 2024 and N<sub>2</sub>O fluxes from February 2019 to October 2024 using the Radon Tracer Method (RTM). We first performed a sensitivity study of this method applied to CH<sub>4</sub> and combined with different radon exhalation maps including the improved European process-based radon flux maps developed within 19ENV01 traceRadon and back-trajectories in order to optimize it. Then, radon exhalation maps from the 19ENV01 traceRadon project, STILT trajectories from the ICOS Carbon Portal, best estimate of radon activity concentration and greenhouse data have been used to estimate the surface emissions. To our knowledge, this is the first study in Europe using the latest radon exhalation maps and standardized radon measurements to estimate CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, CO and N<sub>2</sub>O surface emissions. We found that the average RTM estimates are 867 ± 565, 1.10 ± 0.89, 1.01 ± 1.05 and 0.094 ± 0.118 mgm-2h-1 for CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, CO and N<sub>2</sub>O, respectively. These fluxes are in good agreement with the literature for the same site or for similar suburban sites in Europe. No significant trends are observed over time, except for CO, which shows a small decreasing trend especially over the last three years. CH<sub>4</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O and CO are also in fair agreement with the inventories, though with higher values. CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes are about 5 times higher than modeled anthropogenic and biogenic fluxes combined. The differences mainly occur during summer, and the CO/CO<sub>2</sub> ratio points toward a misrepresentation of the biogenic fluxes by the WRF-VPRM version used here.</p>}},
  author       = {{Yver-Kwok, Camille and Ramonet, Michel and Rivier, Leonard and Lian, Jinghui and Grossi, Claudia and Curcoll, Roger and Kikaj, Dafina and Chung, Edward and Karstens, Ute}},
  issn         = {{1680-7316}},
  keywords     = {{radon; CO2; CH4; N2O}},
  language     = {{eng}},
  month        = {{11}},
  number       = {{22}},
  pages        = {{16085--16106}},
  publisher    = {{Copernicus GmbH}},
  series       = {{Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics}},
  title        = {{Measurement report : Eight years of greenhouse gas fluxes at Saclay, France, estimated with the Radon Tracer Method}},
  url          = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-16085-2025}},
  doi          = {{10.5194/acp-25-16085-2025}},
  volume       = {{25}},
  year         = {{2025}},
}