Advanced

Similar views on rehabilitation following hip arthroscopy among physiotherapists and surgeons in Scandinavia : a specialized care survey

Wörner, Tobias LU ; Thorborg, K; Moksnes, Heidi and Eek, Frida LU (2017) In Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Abstract

PURPOSE: The rising number of hip arthroscopies (HA) is leading to increasing numbers of patients requiring post-surgical rehabilitation; however, evidence regarding post-operative rehabilitation is currently limited. The purpose of the study was to describe and compare current rehabilitation strategies and views among surgeons and physiotherapists in Scandinavia.

METHODS: Scandinavian surgeons and physiotherapists experienced with HA and post-surgical rehabilitation were asked to complete an online survey. Ninety clinicians (28 surgeons, 62 physiotherapists) responded.

RESULTS: Both professions mostly rated physiotherapy as very or extremely important in the rehabilitation process. The majority advocated criteria-based or... (More)

PURPOSE: The rising number of hip arthroscopies (HA) is leading to increasing numbers of patients requiring post-surgical rehabilitation; however, evidence regarding post-operative rehabilitation is currently limited. The purpose of the study was to describe and compare current rehabilitation strategies and views among surgeons and physiotherapists in Scandinavia.

METHODS: Scandinavian surgeons and physiotherapists experienced with HA and post-surgical rehabilitation were asked to complete an online survey. Ninety clinicians (28 surgeons, 62 physiotherapists) responded.

RESULTS: Both professions mostly rated physiotherapy as very or extremely important in the rehabilitation process. The majority advocated criteria-based or combined criteria- and time-based progression. Expected rehabilitation timelines were reported with large intra-professional variation but general inter-professional agreement. However, compared with physiotherapists surgeons expected fewer weeks on crutches and faster return to competitive sport. Surgeons more often reported use of evidence-based self-reported outcomes while physiotherapists more often evaluated readiness for return to play.

CONCLUSIONS: Among surgeons and physiotherapists, physiotherapy is considered very important following HA. Generally, very similar views were held between professions. Surgeons expected reduced time on crutches and to return to competitive sports than physiotherapists. Surgeons also used evidence-based self-reported outcomes to a higher degree than physiotherapists. Being the first study to provide an overview on currently applied rehabilitation strategies following HA, results of this study may guide much needed, future research on the rehabilitation process following HA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

(Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
author
organization
publishing date
type
Contribution to journal
publication status
epub
subject
keywords
Journal Article
in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
pages
8 pages
publisher
Springer
ISSN
1433-7347
DOI
10.1007/s00167-017-4676-6
language
English
LU publication?
yes
id
7bc04238-4a6a-4231-9835-8a37ac73e455
date added to LUP
2017-08-17 13:45:49
date last changed
2017-08-17 13:45:49
@article{7bc04238-4a6a-4231-9835-8a37ac73e455,
  abstract     = {<p>PURPOSE: The rising number of hip arthroscopies (HA) is leading to increasing numbers of patients requiring post-surgical rehabilitation; however, evidence regarding post-operative rehabilitation is currently limited. The purpose of the study was to describe and compare current rehabilitation strategies and views among surgeons and physiotherapists in Scandinavia.</p><p>METHODS: Scandinavian surgeons and physiotherapists experienced with HA and post-surgical rehabilitation were asked to complete an online survey. Ninety clinicians (28 surgeons, 62 physiotherapists) responded.</p><p>RESULTS: Both professions mostly rated physiotherapy as very or extremely important in the rehabilitation process. The majority advocated criteria-based or combined criteria- and time-based progression. Expected rehabilitation timelines were reported with large intra-professional variation but general inter-professional agreement. However, compared with physiotherapists surgeons expected fewer weeks on crutches and faster return to competitive sport. Surgeons more often reported use of evidence-based self-reported outcomes while physiotherapists more often evaluated readiness for return to play.</p><p>CONCLUSIONS: Among surgeons and physiotherapists, physiotherapy is considered very important following HA. Generally, very similar views were held between professions. Surgeons expected reduced time on crutches and to return to competitive sports than physiotherapists. Surgeons also used evidence-based self-reported outcomes to a higher degree than physiotherapists. Being the first study to provide an overview on currently applied rehabilitation strategies following HA, results of this study may guide much needed, future research on the rehabilitation process following HA.</p><p>LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.</p>},
  author       = {Wörner, Tobias and Thorborg, K and Moksnes, Heidi and Eek, Frida},
  issn         = {1433-7347},
  keyword      = {Journal Article},
  language     = {eng},
  month        = {08},
  pages        = {8},
  publisher    = {Springer},
  series       = {Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy},
  title        = {Similar views on rehabilitation following hip arthroscopy among physiotherapists and surgeons in Scandinavia : a specialized care survey},
  url          = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4676-6},
  year         = {2017},
}