Incentives to vaccinate
(2024) In NBER Working Papers- Abstract
- Whether monetary incentives to change behavior work and how they should be structured are fundamental economic questions. We overcome typical data limitations in a large-scale field experiment on vaccination (N = 5,324) with a unique combination of administrative and survey data. We find that guaranteed incentives of $20 increase uptake by 13 percentage points in the short run and 9 in the long run. Guaranteed incentives are more effective than lottery-based, prosocial, or individually-targeted incentives, though all boost vaccinations. There are no unintended consequences on future vaccination or heterogeneities based on vaccination attitudes and incentivized economic preferences. Further, administrative data on relatives shows... (More)
- Whether monetary incentives to change behavior work and how they should be structured are fundamental economic questions. We overcome typical data limitations in a large-scale field experiment on vaccination (N = 5,324) with a unique combination of administrative and survey data. We find that guaranteed incentives of $20 increase uptake by 13 percentage points in the short run and 9 in the long run. Guaranteed incentives are more effective than lottery-based, prosocial, or individually-targeted incentives, though all boost vaccinations. There are no unintended consequences on future vaccination or heterogeneities based on vaccination attitudes and incentivized economic preferences. Further, administrative data on relatives shows substantial positive spillovers. Our findings demonstrate the great potential of incentives for improving public health and provide guidance on their design. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/7ccd3c2b-7322-4cf2-818b-a40a9abacf48
- author
- Campos-Mercade, Pol LU ; Meier, Armando ; Meier, Stephan ; Pope, Devin ; Schneider, Florian H and Wengström, Erik LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2024-09
- type
- Working paper/Preprint
- publication status
- published
- subject
- in
- NBER Working Papers
- issue
- 32899
- publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research
- DOI
- 10.3386/w32899
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 7ccd3c2b-7322-4cf2-818b-a40a9abacf48
- date added to LUP
- 2025-03-24 10:13:35
- date last changed
- 2025-04-04 14:44:09
@misc{7ccd3c2b-7322-4cf2-818b-a40a9abacf48, abstract = {{Whether monetary incentives to change behavior work and how they should be structured are fundamental economic questions. We overcome typical data limitations in a large-scale field experiment on vaccination (N = 5,324) with a unique combination of administrative and survey data. We find that guaranteed incentives of $20 increase uptake by 13 percentage points in the short run and 9 in the long run. Guaranteed incentives are more effective than lottery-based, prosocial, or individually-targeted incentives, though all boost vaccinations. There are no unintended consequences on future vaccination or heterogeneities based on vaccination attitudes and incentivized economic preferences. Further, administrative data on relatives shows substantial positive spillovers. Our findings demonstrate the great potential of incentives for improving public health and provide guidance on their design.}}, author = {{Campos-Mercade, Pol and Meier, Armando and Meier, Stephan and Pope, Devin and Schneider, Florian H and Wengström, Erik}}, language = {{eng}}, note = {{Working Paper}}, number = {{32899}}, publisher = {{National Bureau of Economic Research}}, series = {{NBER Working Papers}}, title = {{Incentives to vaccinate}}, url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w32899}}, doi = {{10.3386/w32899}}, year = {{2024}}, }