The effects of quantifier size on the construction of discourse models
Klingvall, Eva LU
and Heinat, Fredrik
LU
(2022)
In Journal of Neurolinguistics
63.
- Abstract
- Sentences with quantified expressions involve mental representations of sets of individuals for which some property holds (the reference set), as well as of sets for which the property does not hold (the complement set). Both sets can receive discourse focus with negative quantifiers, while the reference set is strongly preferred with positive quantifiers, complement set focus however being possible if contextually motivated. In an offline semantic plausibility study and two online EEG studies, we investigated whether the complement set is an available discourse entity inherently for positive quantifiers, as it is for negative quantifiers. The results show that while the default focus patterns induced by positive and negative quantifiers... (More)
- Sentences with quantified expressions involve mental representations of sets of individuals for which some property holds (the reference set), as well as of sets for which the property does not hold (the complement set). Both sets can receive discourse focus with negative quantifiers, while the reference set is strongly preferred with positive quantifiers, complement set focus however being possible if contextually motivated. In an offline semantic plausibility study and two online EEG studies, we investigated whether the complement set is an available discourse entity inherently for positive quantifiers, as it is for negative quantifiers. The results show that while the default focus patterns induced by positive and negative quantifiers are robust, both complement and reference set are represented as discourse entities and this is to our knowledge the first study to show that even positive quantifiers make both reference and complement set mentally represented during discourse processing without contextual influence. We also discuss the impact the results from the two ERP studies have on the functional interpretation of two well known ERP effects: the N400 and the P600. (Less)
Please use this url to cite or link to this publication:
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/7e92fa33-61e1-4ee5-96ff-8d715eb7cd57
- author
- Klingvall, Eva
LU
and Heinat, Fredrik
LU
- organization
- publishing date
- 2022-02
- type
- Contribution to journal
- publication status
- published
- subject
- keywords
- Sentence processing, ERP, P600, Semantics, Swedish, Acceptability study
- in
- Journal of Neurolinguistics
- volume
- 63
- article number
- 101066
- publisher
- Elsevier
- external identifiers
-
- scopus:85125144932
- ISSN
- 0911-6044
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2022.101066
- project
- Set size and reference
- Quantification in Swedish
- Variation i referens till kvantitativa nominalfraser
- language
- English
- LU publication?
- yes
- id
- 7e92fa33-61e1-4ee5-96ff-8d715eb7cd57
- date added to LUP
- 2022-02-25 08:14:14
- date last changed
- 2023-09-11 10:48:26
@article{7e92fa33-61e1-4ee5-96ff-8d715eb7cd57,
abstract = {{Sentences with quantified expressions involve mental representations of sets of individuals for which some property holds (the reference set), as well as of sets for which the property does not hold (the complement set). Both sets can receive discourse focus with negative quantifiers, while the reference set is strongly preferred with positive quantifiers, complement set focus however being possible if contextually motivated. In an offline semantic plausibility study and two online EEG studies, we investigated whether the complement set is an available discourse entity inherently for positive quantifiers, as it is for negative quantifiers. The results show that while the default focus patterns induced by positive and negative quantifiers are robust, both complement and reference set are represented as discourse entities and this is to our knowledge the first study to show that even positive quantifiers make both reference and complement set mentally represented during discourse processing without contextual influence. We also discuss the impact the results from the two ERP studies have on the functional interpretation of two well known ERP effects: the N400 and the P600.}},
author = {{Klingvall, Eva and Heinat, Fredrik}},
issn = {{0911-6044}},
keywords = {{Sentence processing; ERP; P600; Semantics; Swedish; Acceptability study}},
language = {{eng}},
publisher = {{Elsevier}},
series = {{Journal of Neurolinguistics}},
title = {{The effects of quantifier size on the construction of discourse models}},
url = {{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2022.101066}},
doi = {{10.1016/j.jneuroling.2022.101066}},
volume = {{63}},
year = {{2022}},
}